hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Detect NTFS timestamp manipulation (MITRE T1070.006) by comparing $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME timestamps in the MFT. Uses analyzeMFT and Python to identify files with anomalous temporal patterns indicating anti-forensic timestomping activity.

skill.md
name
hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping
description
'Detect NTFS timestamp manipulation (MITRE T1070.006) by comparing $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME timestamps in the MFT. Uses analyzeMFT and Python to identify files with anomalous temporal patterns indicating anti-forensic timestomping activity. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
threat-hunting
tags
- timestomping - ntfs-forensics - mft-analysis - defense-evasion
version
'1.0'
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques
- File Metadata Consistency Validation - Content Format Conversion - File Content Analysis - Platform Hardening - File Format Verification
nist_csf
- DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - DE.AE-07 - ID.RA-05

Hunting for Defense Evasion via Timestomping

Detect timestamp manipulation by analyzing NTFS MFT entries for discrepancies between $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME attributes.

When to Use

  • Investigating suspected anti-forensic activity where an adversary may have altered file timestamps to blend malware into legitimate directories
  • Threat hunting for defense evasion (MITRE ATT&CK T1070.006) across compromised Windows systems
  • Validating timeline integrity during forensic examinations of disk images or live acquisitions
  • Triaging suspicious files that appear to have creation dates older than the OS installation or inconsistent with known deployment timelines
  • Detecting tools like Timestomp (Metasploit), NTimeStomp, SetMACE, or PowerShell Set-ItemProperty used to alter timestamps
  • Building automated detection pipelines that flag temporal anomalies in MFT data for SOC analysts

Do not use as the sole detection method; advanced adversaries can manipulate both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps (though the latter requires raw disk access and is much harder). Combine with USN Journal, $LogFile, and ShimCache/Amcache analysis for corroboration.

Prerequisites

  • Raw $MFT file extracted from a Windows system (via FTK Imager, KAPE, or live extraction)
  • MFTECmd (Eric Zimmerman tool) or analyzeMFT for MFT parsing
  • Python 3.8+ with pandas for analysis
  • Optional: mft Python library (pip install mft) for programmatic MFT parsing
  • Optional: KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) for automated artifact collection
  • Timeline Explorer or Excel for visual analysis of parsed MFT output

Workflow

Step 1: Extract the $MFT from a Live System or Disk Image

# Method 1: Using KAPE to collect MFT and related artifacts
.\kape.exe --tsource C: --tdest D:\Evidence\MFT_Collection --target !SANS_Triage

# Method 2: Using FTK Imager CLI to extract $MFT
ftkimager.exe \\.\C: D:\Evidence\mft_raw.bin --e01 --include $MFT

# Method 3: Raw copy using RawCopy (handles locked NTFS system files)
RawCopy.exe /FileNamePath:C:0 /OutputPath:D:\Evidence\ /OutputName:$MFT
# Method 4: On a mounted forensic image in Linux
sudo mount -o ro,norecovery /dev/sdb1 /mnt/evidence
sudo icat -o 2048 /dev/sdb 0 > /mnt/output/$MFT

# Method 5: Using sleuthkit to extract MFT from disk image
icat -o 2048 evidence.E01 0 > extracted_MFT

Step 2: Parse the MFT with MFTECmd

Use Eric Zimmerman's MFTECmd to produce a CSV with both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps:

# Parse MFT to CSV with all timestamp columns
MFTECmd.exe -f "D:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf mft_parsed.csv

# The output CSV contains these critical columns:
# Created0x10         - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Created timestamp
# LastModified0x10    - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Modified timestamp
# LastAccess0x10      - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Accessed timestamp
# LastRecordChange0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Entry Modified timestamp
# Created0x30         - $FILE_NAME Created timestamp
# LastModified0x30    - $FILE_NAME Modified timestamp
# LastAccess0x30      - $FILE_NAME Accessed timestamp
# LastRecordChange0x30 - $FILE_NAME Entry Modified timestamp

Step 3: Detect Timestomping via SI vs FN Comparison

The core detection: $STANDARD_INFORMATION timestamps are easily modified by user-mode tools, but $FILE_NAME timestamps are updated only by the NTFS driver (kernel-mode). When SI timestamps are OLDER than FN timestamps, timestomping is likely:

import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

def load_mft_data(csv_path):
    """Load MFTECmd parsed CSV output."""
    df = pd.read_csv(csv_path, low_memory=False)

    # Parse timestamp columns
    timestamp_cols = [
        "Created0x10", "LastModified0x10", "LastAccess0x10", "LastRecordChange0x10",
        "Created0x30", "LastModified0x30", "LastAccess0x30", "LastRecordChange0x30"
    ]

    for col in timestamp_cols:
        if col in df.columns:
            df[col] = pd.to_datetime(df[col], errors="coerce")

    return df

def detect_timestomping(df):
    """Detect timestamp manipulation by comparing SI and FN attributes.

    Key indicators:
    1. SI Created < FN Created (SI timestamp pushed back in time)
    2. SI timestamps have nanoseconds = 0000000 (tool artifact)
    3. SI Created < FN Entry Modified (impossible under normal NTFS behavior)
    4. Large gap between SI and FN timestamps
    """
    results = []

    for idx, row in df.iterrows():
        si_created = row.get("Created0x10")
        fn_created = row.get("Created0x30")
        si_modified = row.get("LastModified0x10")
        fn_modified = row.get("LastModified0x30")
        si_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x10")
        fn_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x30")

        if pd.isna(si_created) or pd.isna(fn_created):
            continue

        filepath = row.get("FileName", "unknown")
        parent_path = row.get("ParentPath", "")
        full_path = f"{parent_path}\\{filepath}" if parent_path else filepath
        indicators = []

        # Detection 1: SI Created is BEFORE FN Created
        # Under normal NTFS operations, SI Created >= FN Created
        if si_created < fn_created:
            delta = fn_created - si_created
            indicators.append({
                "check": "SI_Created < FN_Created",
                "si_value": str(si_created),
                "fn_value": str(fn_created),
                "delta": str(delta),
                "confidence": "high"
            })

        # Detection 2: SI Modified is BEFORE FN Created
        # A file cannot be modified before it was created
        if pd.notna(si_modified) and si_modified < fn_created:
            indicators.append({
                "check": "SI_Modified < FN_Created",
                "si_value": str(si_modified),
                "fn_value": str(fn_created),
                "confidence": "high"
            })

        # Detection 3: Nanosecond precision check
        # Many timestomping tools set timestamps with zero nanoseconds
        if pd.notna(si_created):
            si_created_str = str(si_created)
            if ".000000" in si_created_str or si_created_str.endswith("00:00:00"):
                # Check if FN has normal nanosecond precision
                fn_str = str(fn_created)
                if ".000000" not in fn_str:
                    indicators.append({
                        "check": "SI_nanoseconds_zeroed",
                        "si_value": si_created_str,
                        "fn_value": fn_str,
                        "confidence": "medium"
                    })

        # Detection 4: Large time gap between SI and FN
        # Normal gap is seconds to minutes, not years
        if abs((si_created - fn_created).days) > 365:
            indicators.append({
                "check": "SI_FN_gap_exceeds_1_year",
                "si_value": str(si_created),
                "fn_value": str(fn_created),
                "delta_days": abs((si_created - fn_created).days),
                "confidence": "high"
            })

        # Detection 5: SI Entry Modified much later than SI Created
        # Indicates the SI attribute was rewritten
        if pd.notna(si_entry) and pd.notna(si_created):
            entry_delta = si_entry - si_created
            if entry_delta.days > 365 * 5:  # Entry modified years after creation
                indicators.append({
                    "check": "SI_entry_modified_years_after_creation",
                    "si_created": str(si_created),
                    "si_entry_modified": str(si_entry),
                    "confidence": "medium"
                })

        if indicators:
            results.append({
                "file_path": full_path,
                "entry_number": row.get("EntryNumber", ""),
                "in_use": row.get("InUse", True),
                "si_created": str(si_created),
                "fn_created": str(fn_created),
                "indicators": indicators,
                "highest_confidence": max(i["confidence"] for i in indicators),
            })

    return results

# Run detection
df = load_mft_data("D:\\Evidence\\Parsed\\mft_parsed.csv")
stomped_files = detect_timestomping(df)

print(f"\nTimestomping Detection Results")
print(f"{'='*60}")
print(f"Total MFT entries analyzed: {len(df)}")
print(f"Suspicious entries found: {len(stomped_files)}")
print()

for entry in sorted(stomped_files, key=lambda x: x["highest_confidence"], reverse=True):
    print(f"[{entry['highest_confidence'].upper()}] {entry['file_path']}")
    print(f"  SI Created: {entry['si_created']}")
    print(f"  FN Created: {entry['fn_created']}")
    for ind in entry["indicators"]:
        print(f"  Check: {ind['check']} (confidence: {ind['confidence']})")
    print()

Step 4: Corroborate with USN Journal Analysis

The USN Journal records metadata change events that persist even after timestomping:

def correlate_with_usn_journal(stomped_files, usn_csv_path):
    """Cross-reference timestomped files with USN Journal entries.

    The USN Journal records a BASIC_INFO_CHANGE reason when timestamps
    are modified, providing corroborating evidence of timestomping.
    """
    usn_df = pd.read_csv(usn_csv_path, low_memory=False)
    usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"] = pd.to_datetime(usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"], errors="coerce")

    corroborated = []
    for entry in stomped_files:
        filename = entry["file_path"].split("\\")[-1]

        # Find USN entries for this file with BASIC_INFO_CHANGE
        usn_matches = usn_df[
            (usn_df["Name"] == filename) &
            (usn_df["UpdateReasons"].str.contains("BASIC_INFO_CHANGE", na=False))
        ]

        if not usn_matches.empty:
            entry["usn_corroboration"] = True
            entry["usn_change_times"] = usn_matches["UpdateTimestamp"].tolist()
            entry["highest_confidence"] = "critical"
            corroborated.append(entry)
            print(f"[CORROBORATED] {filename} - USN Journal confirms "
                  f"BASIC_INFO_CHANGE at {usn_matches['UpdateTimestamp'].iloc[0]}")

    return corroborated

# Parse USN Journal (use MFTECmd or ANJP)
# MFTECmd.exe -f "$J" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf usn_parsed.csv

Step 5: Check ShimCache and Amcache for Timeline Validation

def check_shimcache_timeline(stomped_files, shimcache_csv):
    """Validate timestamps against ShimCache (AppCompatCache) entries.

    ShimCache records the last modification time of executables
    independently of NTFS timestamps, providing another corroboration point.
    """
    shim_df = pd.read_csv(shimcache_csv, low_memory=False)
    shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"] = pd.to_datetime(
        shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"], errors="coerce"
    )

    for entry in stomped_files:
        filepath = entry["file_path"]
        shim_match = shim_df[
            shim_df["Path"].str.lower() == filepath.lower()
        ]

        if not shim_match.empty:
            shim_time = shim_match["LastModifiedTimeUTC"].iloc[0]
            si_modified = pd.to_datetime(entry.get("si_created"))

            if pd.notna(shim_time) and pd.notna(si_modified):
                delta = abs((shim_time - si_modified).days)
                if delta > 30:
                    entry["shimcache_mismatch"] = True
                    entry["shimcache_time"] = str(shim_time)
                    print(f"[SHIMCACHE MISMATCH] {filepath}")
                    print(f"  SI timestamp: {si_modified}")
                    print(f"  ShimCache timestamp: {shim_time}")
                    print(f"  Delta: {delta} days")

    return stomped_files

Step 6: Generate a Timestomping Detection Report

import json

def generate_report(stomped_files, output_path):
    """Generate a structured JSON report of all timestomping detections."""
    report = {
        "report_title": "Timestomping Detection Analysis",
        "generated_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z",
        "mitre_technique": "T1070.006 - Indicator Removal: Timestomp",
        "total_suspicious_files": len(stomped_files),
        "critical_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "critical"]),
        "high_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "high"]),
        "medium_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "medium"]),
        "findings": stomped_files,
    }

    with open(output_path, "w") as f:
        json.dump(report, f, indent=2, default=str)
    print(f"Report written to {output_path}")
    print(f"  Critical: {report['critical_findings']}")
    print(f"  High: {report['high_findings']}")
    print(f"  Medium: {report['medium_findings']}")

generate_report(stomped_files, "D:\\Evidence\\timestomping_report.json")

Verification

  • Confirm MFTECmd parses the $MFT without errors and produces both 0x10 (SI) and 0x30 (FN) timestamp columns
  • Create a test file and use a timestomping tool (e.g., NTimeStomp) in a lab to verify the detection logic catches the manipulation
  • Validate that the nanosecond-zeroed check does not produce excessive false positives on files created by installers that legitimately set timestamps
  • Cross-reference flagged files with the USN Journal to confirm BASIC_INFO_CHANGE events exist at the expected times
  • Verify ShimCache and Amcache timestamps provide independent corroboration of timeline inconsistencies
  • Test against known-clean system images to establish a false-positive baseline (some backup/imaging software legitimately resets timestamps)
  • Confirm the detection pipeline correctly handles deleted MFT entries (InUse=false) which may contain evidence of timestomped files that were later removed
how to use hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping

How to use hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping

The skills CLI fetches hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping

Reload or restart Cursor to activate hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.550 reviews
  • Soo Smith· Dec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Soo Garcia· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Diego Chen· Dec 4, 2024

    hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Liam Farah· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Diya Martinez· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Diya Mehta· Oct 26, 2024

    Useful defaults in hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 18, 2024

    hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Diego Patel· Oct 14, 2024

    I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Diya Yang· Sep 25, 2024

    I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 50

1 / 5