detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
Installation Guide
How to use detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd. Access via /detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
| name | detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd |
| description | 'Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | security-operations |
| tags | - detecting - supply - chain - attacks |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| atlas_techniques | - AML.T0010 - AML.T0104 |
| nist_ai_rmf | - GOVERN-5.2 - MAP-1.6 - MANAGE-2.2 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - RS.MA-01 - GV.OV-01 - DE.AE-02 |
Detecting Supply Chain Attacks in CI/CD
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting supply chain attacks in ci cd
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Instructions
Scan CI/CD workflow files for supply chain risks by parsing GitHub Actions YAML, checking for unpinned dependencies, script injection vectors, and secrets exposure.
import yaml
from pathlib import Path
for wf in Path(".github/workflows").glob("*.yml"):
with open(wf) as f:
workflow = yaml.safe_load(f)
for job_name, job in workflow.get("jobs", {}).items():
for step in job.get("steps", []):
uses = step.get("uses", "")
if uses and "@" in uses and not uses.split("@")[1].startswith("sha"):
print(f"Unpinned action: {uses} in {wf.name}")
Key supply chain risks:
- Unpinned GitHub Actions (using @main instead of SHA)
- Script injection via ${{ github.event }} expressions
- Overly permissive GITHUB_TOKEN permissions
- Third-party actions with write access to repo
- Dependency confusion via public/private package name collision
Examples
# Check for script injection in run steps
for step in job.get("steps", []):
run_cmd = step.get("run", "")
if "${{" in run_cmd and "github.event" in run_cmd:
print(f"Script injection risk: {run_cmd[:80]}")
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
performing-cryptographic-audit-of-application
5mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
exploiting-deeplink-vulnerabilities
3mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
implementing-soar-playbook-with-palo-alto-xsoar
3mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
analyzing-network-traffic-with-wireshark
2mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
scanning-docker-images-with-trivy
2mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
generating-threat-intelligence-reports
2mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Reviews
- SSakura Robinson★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- KKofi Robinson★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- HHarper Srinivasan★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- KKofi Choi★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- BBenjamin Thompson★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- NNia Sharma★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- NNikhil Harris★★★★★Sep 21, 2024
I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- IIsabella Flores★★★★★Sep 17, 2024
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Sep 9, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Sep 5, 2024
Keeps context tight: detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 33
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.