detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd

Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems.

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

8.6K

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd

0

installs

0

this week

8.6K

stars

Installation Guide

How to use detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd

Fetches detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd

Restart Cursor to activate detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd. Access via /detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

name
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
description
'Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
security-operations
tags
- detecting - supply - chain - attacks
version
'1.0'
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
atlas_techniques
- AML.T0010 - AML.T0104
nist_ai_rmf
- GOVERN-5.2 - MAP-1.6 - MANAGE-2.2
nist_csf
- DE.CM-01 - RS.MA-01 - GV.OV-01 - DE.AE-02

Detecting Supply Chain Attacks in CI/CD

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require detecting supply chain attacks in ci cd
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools
  • Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
  • Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
  • Appropriate authorization for any testing activities

Instructions

Scan CI/CD workflow files for supply chain risks by parsing GitHub Actions YAML, checking for unpinned dependencies, script injection vectors, and secrets exposure.

import yaml
from pathlib import Path

for wf in Path(".github/workflows").glob("*.yml"):
    with open(wf) as f:
        workflow = yaml.safe_load(f)
    for job_name, job in workflow.get("jobs", {}).items():
        for step in job.get("steps", []):
            uses = step.get("uses", "")
            if uses and "@" in uses and not uses.split("@")[1].startswith("sha"):
                print(f"Unpinned action: {uses} in {wf.name}")

Key supply chain risks:

  1. Unpinned GitHub Actions (using @main instead of SHA)
  2. Script injection via ${{ github.event }} expressions
  3. Overly permissive GITHUB_TOKEN permissions
  4. Third-party actions with write access to repo
  5. Dependency confusion via public/private package name collision

Examples

# Check for script injection in run steps
for step in job.get("steps", []):
    run_cmd = step.get("run", "")
    if "${{" in run_cmd and "github.event" in run_cmd:
        print(f"Script injection risk: {run_cmd[:80]}")

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Steps

  1. 1Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.733 reviews
  • S
    Sakura RobinsonDec 28, 2024

    detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • K
    Kofi RobinsonDec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • H
    Harper SrinivasanNov 19, 2024

    detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • K
    Kofi ChoiNov 15, 2024

    I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • B
    Benjamin ThompsonOct 10, 2024

    I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • N
    Nia SharmaOct 6, 2024

    detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • N
    Nikhil HarrisSep 21, 2024

    I recommend detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • I
    Isabella FloresSep 17, 2024

    detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Y
    Yash ThakkerSep 9, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • R
    Rahul SantraSep 5, 2024

    Keeps context tight: detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

showing 1-10 of 33

1 / 4

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.