detecting-api-enumeration-attacks▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Detect and prevent API enumeration attacks including BOLA and IDOR exploitation by monitoring sequential identifier access patterns and authorization failures.
| name | detecting-api-enumeration-attacks |
| description | Detect and prevent API enumeration attacks including BOLA and IDOR exploitation by monitoring sequential identifier access patterns and authorization failures. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | api-security |
| tags | - api-security - enumeration - bola - idor - broken-object-level-authorization - owasp-api-top-10 - access-control - rate-limiting |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Detecting API Enumeration Attacks
Overview
API enumeration attacks occur when attackers systematically probe API endpoints with sequential or predictable identifiers to discover and access unauthorized resources. Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), ranked as API1:2023 in the OWASP API Security Top 10, is the most critical API vulnerability. Attackers manipulate object identifiers (user IDs, order numbers, account references) in API requests to bypass authorization and access other users' data. Detection requires monitoring for patterns of rapid sequential access attempts, authorization failures, and abnormal API usage behavior.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting api enumeration attacks
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- API gateway or reverse proxy with logging enabled (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Apigee)
- SIEM platform (Splunk, Elastic SIEM, or Microsoft Sentinel)
- Access to API server logs with request details
- Web Application Firewall (WAF) with API protection capabilities
- Understanding of the API's authorization model and object identifier schemes
Attack Patterns to Detect
1. Sequential ID Enumeration
Attackers iterate through numeric or predictable identifiers:
GET /api/v1/users/1001 -> 200 OK
GET /api/v1/users/1002 -> 200 OK
GET /api/v1/users/1003 -> 403 Forbidden
GET /api/v1/users/1004 -> 200 OK
GET /api/v1/users/1005 -> 200 OK
...
Detection Indicators:
- Rapid sequential requests to the same endpoint with incrementing IDs
- Mix of 200/403/401 responses from same source
- Request rate exceeding normal user behavior
- Access to resources outside authenticated user's scope
2. UUID/GUID Enumeration
Even non-sequential identifiers can be enumerated if leaked through other endpoints:
# Attacker first harvests UUIDs from a list endpoint
GET /api/v1/posts?page=1 -> Returns post objects with author UUIDs
# Then uses those UUIDs to access restricted user data
GET /api/v1/users/a3f2c1e4-... -> Private user profile
GET /api/v1/users/b7d9e8f1-... -> Private user profile
3. Parameter Tampering Enumeration
# Authenticated as user_id=100, attempting to access other users' orders
GET /api/v1/orders?user_id=101
GET /api/v1/orders?user_id=102
GET /api/v1/orders?user_id=103
Detection Rules
Splunk Detection Queries
# Detect sequential ID enumeration on API endpoints
index=api_logs sourcetype=api_access
| rex field=uri_path "(?<endpoint>/api/v\d+/\w+/)(?<object_id>\d+)"
| stats count as request_count,
dc(object_id) as unique_ids,
values(status_code) as status_codes,
min(_time) as first_seen,
max(_time) as last_seen
by src_ip, endpoint, user_session
| eval time_span = last_seen - first_seen
| eval requests_per_second = request_count / max(time_span, 1)
| where unique_ids > 20 AND requests_per_second > 2
| eval severity = case(
unique_ids > 100, "critical",
unique_ids > 50, "high",
unique_ids > 20, "medium",
1==1, "low"
)
| sort - unique_ids
| table src_ip, endpoint, unique_ids, request_count, requests_per_second,
status_codes, severity
# Detect BOLA via authorization failure patterns
index=api_logs sourcetype=api_access status_code IN (401, 403)
| bin _time span=5m
| stats count as failure_count,
dc(uri_path) as unique_paths,
values(uri_path) as attempted_paths
by _time, src_ip, user_id
| where failure_count > 10
| eval attack_type = if(unique_paths > 5, "enumeration", "brute_force")
Elastic SIEM Detection Rules
{
"rule": {
"name": "API Object Enumeration Detection",
"description": "Detects rapid sequential access to API objects with mixed authorization results",
"type": "threshold",
"index": ["api-access-*"],
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{ "regexp": { "url.path": "/api/v[0-9]+/[a-z]+/[0-9]+" } }
],
"should": [
{ "term": { "http.response.status_code": 200 } },
{ "term": { "http.response.status_code": 403 } },
{ "term": { "http.response.status_code": 401 } }
]
}
},
"threshold": {
"field": ["source.ip"],
"value": 50,
"cardinality": [
{ "field": "url.path", "value": 20 }
]
},
"schedule": { "interval": "5m" },
"severity": "high",
"risk_score": 73,
"tags": ["OWASP-API1", "BOLA", "Enumeration"]
}
}
Custom Detection Script
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""API Enumeration Attack Detector
Analyzes API access logs to detect enumeration patterns
including BOLA, IDOR, and sequential ID probing.
"""
import re
import sys
import json
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
@dataclass
class AccessRecord:
timestamp: datetime
source_ip: str
user_id: Optional[str]
method: str
path: str
status_code: int
object_id: Optional[str] = None
@dataclass
class EnumerationAlert:
source_ip: str
user_id: Optional[str]
endpoint_pattern: str
unique_object_ids: int
total_requests: int
time_window_seconds: float
requests_per_second: float
auth_failure_ratio: float
severity: str
attack_type: str
sample_ids: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
class EnumerationDetector:
# Regex patterns for extracting object IDs from API paths
ID_PATTERNS = [
re.compile(r'/api/v\d+/(\w+)/(\d+)'), # Numeric IDs
re.compile(r'/api/v\d+/(\w+)/([a-f0-9\-]{36})'), # UUIDs
re.compile(r'/api/v\d+/(\w+)/([a-zA-Z0-9]{20,})'), # Long alphanumeric IDs
]
def __init__(self, time_window_minutes: int = 5,
min_unique_ids: int = 15,
max_requests_per_second: float = 5.0):
self.time_window = timedelta(minutes=time_window_minutes)
self.min_unique_ids = min_unique_ids
self.max_rps = max_requests_per_second
self.access_log: List[AccessRecord] = []
def parse_log_line(self, line: str) -> Optional[AccessRecord]:
"""Parse a common log format line into an AccessRecord."""
log_pattern = re.compile(
r'(?P<ip>[\d.]+)\s+\S+\s+(?P<user>\S+)\s+'
r'\[(?P<time>[^\]]+)\]\s+'
r'"(?P<method>\w+)\s+(?P<path>\S+)\s+\S+"\s+'
r'(?P<status>\d+)'
)
match = log_pattern.match(line)
if not match:
return None
path = match.group('path')
object_id = None
for pattern in self.ID_PATTERNS:
id_match = pattern.search(path)
if id_match:
object_id = id_match.group(2)
break
return AccessRecord(
timestamp=datetime.strptime(match.group('time'), '%d/%b/%Y:%H:%M:%S %z'),
source_ip=match.group('ip'),
user_id=match.group('user') if match.group('user') != '-' else None,
method=match.group('method'),
path=path,
status_code=int(match.group('status')),
object_id=object_id
)
def analyze(self, records: List[AccessRecord]) -> List[EnumerationAlert]:
"""Analyze access records for enumeration patterns."""
alerts = []
# Group by source IP and endpoint pattern
grouped = defaultdict(list)
for record in records:
if record.object_id:
# Normalize endpoint by removing the specific object ID
endpoint = re.sub(r'/[a-f0-9\-]{36}', '/{id}',
re.sub(r'/\d+', '/{id}', record.path))
key = (record.source_ip, record.user_id, endpoint)
grouped[key].append(record)
for (src_ip, user_id, endpoint), records_group in grouped.items():
if len(records_group) < self.min_unique_ids:
continue
# Sort by timestamp
records_group.sort(key=lambda r: r.timestamp)
# Analyze time windows
window_start = 0
for window_start in range(len(records_group)):
window_records = []
for r in records_group[window_start:]:
if r.timestamp - records_group[window_start].timestamp <= self.time_window:
window_records.append(r)
unique_ids = set(r.object_id for r in window_records)
if len(unique_ids) < self.min_unique_ids:
continue
time_span = (window_records[-1].timestamp -
window_records[0].timestamp).total_seconds()
rps = len(window_records) / max(time_span, 1)
auth_failures = sum(1 for r in window_records
if r.status_code in (401, 403))
failure_ratio = auth_failures / len(window_records)
# Determine severity
if len(unique_ids) > 100:
severity = "critical"
elif len(unique_ids) > 50 or failure_ratio > 0.5:
severity = "high"
elif len(unique_ids) > 20:
severity = "medium"
else:
severity = "low"
# Determine attack type
ids_list = sorted([r.object_id for r in window_records
if r.object_id and r.object_id.isdigit()])
is_sequential = self._check_sequential(ids_list)
attack_type = "sequential_enumeration" if is_sequential else "random_enumeration"
alert = EnumerationAlert(
source_ip=src_ip,
user_id=user_id,
endpoint_pattern=endpoint,
unique_object_ids=len(unique_ids),
total_requests=len(window_records),
time_window_seconds=time_span,
requests_per_second=round(rps, 2),
auth_failure_ratio=round(failure_ratio, 2),
severity=severity,
attack_type=attack_type,
sample_ids=list(unique_ids)[:10]
)
alerts.append(alert)
break # One alert per group
return alerts
def _check_sequential(self, ids: List[str]) -> bool:
"""Check if numeric IDs follow a sequential pattern."""
if len(ids) < 5:
return False
try:
numeric_ids = sorted(int(i) for i in ids)
sequential_count = sum(
1 for i in range(1, len(numeric_ids))
if numeric_ids[i] - numeric_ids[i-1] <= 2
)
return sequential_count / len(numeric_ids) > 0.7
except ValueError:
return False
def main():
detector = EnumerationDetector(
time_window_minutes=5,
min_unique_ids=15
)
log_file = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/var/log/api/access.log"
records = []
with open(log_file, 'r') as f:
for line in f:
record = detector.parse_log_line(line.strip())
if record:
records.append(record)
alerts = detector.analyze(records)
if alerts:
print(f"\n[!] {len(alerts)} enumeration attack(s) detected:\n")
for alert in alerts:
print(f" Source IP: {alert.source_ip}")
print(f" User ID: {alert.user_id}")
print(f" Endpoint: {alert.endpoint_pattern}")
print(f" Unique IDs Accessed: {alert.unique_object_ids}")
print(f" Requests/sec: {alert.requests_per_second}")
print(f" Auth Failure Ratio: {alert.auth_failure_ratio}")
print(f" Attack Type: {alert.attack_type}")
print(f" Severity: {alert.severity.upper()}")
print(f" Sample IDs: {alert.sample_ids}")
print()
else:
print("[+] No enumeration attacks detected.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Prevention Controls
Server-Side Authorization Enforcement
# Always validate object ownership at the data layer
def get_user_order(request, order_id):
order = Order.objects.get(id=order_id)
if order.user_id != request.user.id:
raise PermissionDenied("Not authorized to access this order")
return order
Use Unpredictable Identifiers
import uuid
# Use UUIDs instead of sequential integers
class Order(Model):
id = UUIDField(default=uuid.uuid4, primary_key=True)
Implement Rate Limiting Per Endpoint
# Kong rate limiting per API route
plugins:
- name: rate-limiting
config:
minute: 30
policy: redis
limit_by: credential
References
- OWASP API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization: https://owasp.org/API-Security/editions/2023/en/0xa1-broken-object-level-authorization/
- Traceable.ai BOLA Deep Dive: https://www.traceable.ai/blog-post/a-deep-dive-on-the-most-critical-api-vulnerability----bola-broken-object-level-authorization
- Cequence BOLA Prevention: https://www.cequence.ai/solutions/bola-and-enumeration-attack-prevention/
- Cloudflare API Shield BOLA Detection: https://community.cloudflare.com/t/api-shield-new-bola-vulnerability-detection-for-api-shield/883021
- Sycope IDOR Detection via HTTP Traffic Analysis: https://www.sycope.com/post/idor-vulnerability-how-to-detect-an-attack-on-web-applications-through-http-traffic-analysis
How to use detecting-api-enumeration-attacks on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add detecting-api-enumeration-attacks
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches detecting-api-enumeration-attacks from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate detecting-api-enumeration-attacks. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /detecting-api-enumeration-attacks) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★28 reviews- ★★★★★Anaya Khan· Dec 24, 2024
detecting-api-enumeration-attacks is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
detecting-api-enumeration-attacks fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Anika Rahman· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: detecting-api-enumeration-attacks is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024
detecting-api-enumeration-attacks has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sophia Abebe· Oct 6, 2024
We added detecting-api-enumeration-attacks from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 21, 2024
Useful defaults in detecting-api-enumeration-attacks — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Lopez· Sep 21, 2024
I recommend detecting-api-enumeration-attacks for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Aug 12, 2024
Registry listing for detecting-api-enumeration-attacks matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Amelia Khan· Aug 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-api-enumeration-attacks is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Jul 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-api-enumeration-attacks is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 28