Plan and execute authorized vishing (voice phishing) pretext calls to assess employee susceptibility to social engineering and evaluate security awareness controls.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionconducting-social-engineering-pretext-callExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call. Access via /conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call |
| description | Plan and execute authorized vishing (voice phishing) pretext calls to assess employee susceptibility to social engineering and evaluate security awareness controls. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | red-teaming |
| tags | - social-engineering - vishing - pretext-call - security-awareness - red-team - phishing - human-risk |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| atlas_techniques | - AML.T0088 - AML.T0052 |
| nist_ai_rmf | - GOVERN-6.2 - MAP-5.2 |
| d3fend_techniques | - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Application Protocol Command Analysis - Identifier Analysis - Content Format Conversion - Message Analysis |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - GV.OV-02 - DE.AE-07 |
A pretext call (vishing) is a social engineering technique where an attacker impersonates a trusted authority figure over the phone to manipulate targets into divulging sensitive information, performing actions, or granting access. In red team engagements, pretext calls test the human element of security controls, measuring employee adherence to verification procedures and security awareness training effectiveness. MITRE ATT&CK maps this to T1566.004 (Phishing for Information: Voice) and T1598 (Phishing for Information).
| Technique ID | Name | Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| T1566.004 | Phishing: Voice | Initial Access |
| T1598 | Phishing for Information | Reconnaissance |
| T1598.003 | Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Voice | Reconnaissance |
| T1589 | Gather Victim Identity Information | Reconnaissance |
| T1591 | Gather Victim Org Information | Reconnaissance |
# LinkedIn employee enumeration
theHarvester -d targetcorp.com -b linkedin -l 200
# Company org chart and employee roles
# Review LinkedIn, corporate website "About Us" / "Team" pages
# Technology stack identification
# Check job postings for technology references (VPN vendor, email, helpdesk tool)
# Phone system identification
# Call main line, note IVR options, department names, extension patterns
Key intelligence to gather:
IT Helpdesk Impersonation (Most Effective):
"Hi, this is [name] from the IT Service Desk. We're migrating everyone to the new VPN client this week, and I see your account hasn't been updated yet. I need to verify your current credentials to ensure the migration goes smoothly. Can you confirm your username and current password?"
Vendor/Contractor:
"Hi, I'm [name] from [known vendor]. We're doing an emergency patch deployment for [product] and I need remote access to your system. Could you help me connect via TeamViewer?"
Executive Assistant (Authority):
"This is [name] calling on behalf of [CFO name]. [He/She] needs an urgent wire transfer processed for a deal that's closing today. I'll email you the details, but we need this done in the next hour."
Building/Facilities:
"Hi, this is [name] from facilities management. We're updating the badge access system this weekend. I need to confirm your employee ID and current badge number so your access isn't interrupted."
| Objection | Response |
|---|---|
| "Can I call you back?" | "Of course, call the main helpdesk line and ask for [name]. But this needs to be done by EOD." |
| "I need to verify this" | "Absolutely, I appreciate your diligence. You can check with [manager name]." |
| "I was told never to give passwords" | "You're right, and normally we wouldn't ask. This is a special case because [reason]. I can have my manager call you." |
| "What's your employee ID?" | Pivot: "It's [made-up ID]. Listen, I have 50 more people to call today. Can we just get this done?" |
| "I'll email IT instead" | "Sure, but the system migration happens tonight. If it's not done by then..." |
Track the following for each call:
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Target Name | Employee called |
| Department | Target's department |
| Date/Time | When call was made |
| Duration | Length of call |
| Pretext Used | Which scenario |
| Information Obtained | What was disclosed |
| Credential Disclosed | Yes/No (and type) |
| Verification Attempted | Did target try to verify caller? |
| Reported to Security | Did target report the call? |
| Social Engineering Score | 1-5 susceptibility rating |
| Metric | Target | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Credential Disclosure Rate | <10% | XX% |
| Sensitive Info Disclosure Rate | <20% | XX% |
| Verification Rate | >80% | XX% |
| Security Reporting Rate | >50% | XX% |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Keeps context tight: conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Registry listing for conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
We added conducting-social-engineering-pretext-call from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 47