building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.
| name | building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware |
| description | 'Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - ransomware - incident-response - playbook - nist - mitre-attack - containment |
| mitre_attack | - T1486 - T1490 - T1489 - T1570 |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - Platform Hardening - Restore Object - Restore Configuration - Restore Software - Software Update |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Building SOC Playbook for Ransomware
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC teams need a standardized ransomware response playbook for Tier 1-3 analysts
- An organization lacks documented procedures for ransomware containment and recovery
- Tabletop exercises reveal gaps in ransomware response coordination
- Compliance requirements (NIST CSF, ISO 27001) mandate documented incident playbooks
Do not use during an active ransomware incident as the sole guide — have pre-built playbooks tested and rehearsed before incidents occur.
Prerequisites
- SIEM platform (Splunk ES, Elastic Security, or Sentinel) with endpoint and network data
- EDR solution (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint) with network isolation capability
- Backup infrastructure with tested recovery procedures and offline/immutable backups
- Communication plan with legal, executive leadership, and external IR retainer contacts
- MITRE ATT&CK knowledge for ransomware technique chains
Workflow
Step 1: Define Detection Triggers
Create SIEM detection rules for early ransomware indicators:
Mass File Encryption Detection (Splunk):
index=sysmon EventCode=11
| bin _time span=1m
| stats dc(TargetFilename) AS unique_files, values(TargetFilename) AS sample_files by Computer, Image, _time
| where unique_files > 100
| eval suspicious_extensions = if(match(mvjoin(sample_files, ","), "\.(encrypted|locked|crypt|enc|ransom)"), "YES", "NO")
| where suspicious_extensions="YES" OR unique_files > 500
| sort - unique_files
Shadow Copy Deletion (T1490):
index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" OR index=sysmon EventCode=1
(CommandLine="*vssadmin*delete*shadows*" OR CommandLine="*wmic*shadowcopy*delete*"
OR CommandLine="*bcdedit*/set*recoveryenabled*no*" OR CommandLine="*wbadmin*delete*catalog*")
| table _time, Computer, User, ParentImage, Image, CommandLine
Ransomware Note File Creation:
index=sysmon EventCode=11
TargetFilename IN ("*README*.txt", "*DECRYPT*.txt", "*RANSOM*.txt", "*RECOVER*.html", "*HOW_TO*.txt")
| stats count by Computer, Image, TargetFilename
| where count > 5
Elastic Security EQL variant:
sequence by host.name with maxspan=2m
[process where event.type == "start" and
process.args : ("*vssadmin*", "*delete*", "*shadows*")]
[file where event.type == "creation" and
file.name : ("*README*DECRYPT*", "*RANSOM*", "*HOW_TO_RECOVER*")]
Step 2: Build Triage Decision Tree
RANSOMWARE ALERT TRIAGE
│
├── Is encryption actively occurring?
│ ├── YES → IMMEDIATE: Isolate host from network (Step 3)
│ │ Do NOT power off (preserve memory for forensics)
│ └── NO → Is this a pre-encryption indicator?
│ ├── Shadow copy deletion → HIGH PRIORITY: Isolate and investigate
│ ├── Known ransomware hash → HIGH PRIORITY: Block hash, scan enterprise
│ └── Suspicious process behavior → MEDIUM: Investigate, prepare isolation
│
├── How many hosts affected?
│ ├── Single host → Contained incident, follow host isolation procedure
│ ├── Multiple hosts (2-10) → Escalate to Tier 2, begin enterprise-wide scan
│ └── Enterprise-wide (>10) → Activate full IR team, engage external retainer
│
└── Is data exfiltration confirmed?
├── YES → Double extortion scenario, engage legal for breach notification
└── NO/UNKNOWN → Check for Cobalt Strike/C2 beacons, review outbound transfers
Step 3: Containment Procedures
Network Isolation via EDR (CrowdStrike Falcon):
# Isolate host using CrowdStrike Falcon API
curl -X POST "https://api.crowdstrike.com/devices/entities/devices-actions/v2?action_name=contain" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"ids": ["device_id_here"]}'
Network Isolation via Microsoft Defender for Endpoint:
# Isolate machine via MDE API
$headers = @{Authorization = "Bearer $token"}
$body = @{Comment = "Ransomware containment - IR-2024-0500"; IsolationType = "Full"} | ConvertTo-Json
Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://api.securitycenter.microsoft.com/api/machines/$machineId/isolate" `
-Method Post -Headers $headers -Body $body -ContentType "application/json"
Firewall Emergency Rules:
# Palo Alto — Block SMB lateral spread
set rulebase security rules RansomwareContainment from Trust to Trust
set rulebase security rules RansomwareContainment application ms-ds-smb
set rulebase security rules RansomwareContainment action deny
set rulebase security rules RansomwareContainment disabled no
commit
Active Directory Emergency Actions:
# Disable compromised account
Disable-ADAccount -Identity "compromised_user"
# Reset Kerberos TGT (if domain admin compromised)
# WARNING: This resets krbtgt and requires two resets 12+ hours apart
Reset-KrbtgtKeys -Server "DC-PRIMARY" -Force
# Block lateral movement by disabling remote services
Set-Service -Name "RemoteRegistry" -StartupType Disabled -Status Stopped
Step 4: Evidence Collection and Preservation
Collect forensic artifacts before remediation:
# Capture running processes and network connections
Get-Process | Export-Csv "C:\IR\processes_$(hostname).csv"
Get-NetTCPConnection | Export-Csv "C:\IR\netstat_$(hostname).csv"
# Capture memory dump (if host still running)
winpmem_mini_x64.exe C:\IR\memory_$(hostname).raw
# Collect ransomware artifacts
Copy-Item "C:\Users\*\Desktop\*README*" "C:\IR\ransom_notes\" -Recurse
Copy-Item "C:\Users\*\Desktop\*.encrypted" "C:\IR\encrypted_samples\" -Force
# Capture event logs
wevtutil epl Security "C:\IR\Security_$(hostname).evtx"
wevtutil epl System "C:\IR\System_$(hostname).evtx"
wevtutil epl "Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational" "C:\IR\Sysmon_$(hostname).evtx"
Step 5: Eradication and Recovery
Identify ransomware variant:
- Upload encrypted sample and ransom note to ID Ransomware (https://id-ransomware.malwarehunterteam.com/)
- Check No More Ransom Project (https://www.nomoreransom.org/) for available decryptors
- Search for ransomware family IOCs in MalwareBazaar
Enterprise-wide IOC scan in Splunk:
index=sysmon (EventCode=1 OR EventCode=11 OR EventCode=3)
(TargetFilename="*ransomware_binary_name*" OR sha256="KNOWN_HASH"
OR DestinationIp="C2_IP_ADDRESS" OR CommandLine="*malicious_command*")
| stats count by Computer, EventCode, Image, CommandLine
| sort - count
Recovery from backups:
- Verify backup integrity (offline/immutable backups not affected)
- Rebuild affected systems from known-good images
- Restore data from last clean backup
- Validate restored systems before reconnecting to network
- Monitor restored systems for 72 hours for reinfection
Step 6: Post-Incident Documentation
Structure the playbook conclusion with lessons learned:
POST-INCIDENT REVIEW TEMPLATE
1. Timeline of events (detection to full recovery)
2. Initial access vector identification
3. Dwell time analysis (time from initial compromise to encryption)
4. Detection gaps identified
5. Response effectiveness metrics (MTTD, MTTC, MTTR)
6. Playbook improvements recommended
7. New detection rules deployed
8. Backup and recovery procedure updates
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Double Extortion | Ransomware tactic combining data encryption with data theft, threatening public release if ransom unpaid |
| Dwell Time | Duration between initial compromise and detection — ransomware operators average 5-9 days before encryption |
| MTTC | Mean Time to Contain — time from detection to successful isolation of affected systems |
| Kill Chain | Ransomware progression: Initial Access -> Execution -> Persistence -> Privilege Escalation -> Lateral Movement -> Collection -> Exfiltration -> Impact |
| Immutable Backup | Backup storage that cannot be modified or deleted for a defined retention period (WORM storage) |
| RTO/RPO | Recovery Time Objective / Recovery Point Objective — maximum acceptable downtime and data loss thresholds |
Tools & Systems
- CrowdStrike Falcon / SentinelOne: EDR platforms with network isolation, process kill, and threat hunting capabilities
- Splunk ES / Elastic Security: SIEM platforms for detection rule deployment and enterprise-wide IOC scanning
- ID Ransomware: Online service identifying ransomware variants from encrypted file samples and ransom notes
- No More Ransom Project: Europol-backed initiative providing free decryption tools for known ransomware families
- Veeam / Rubrik: Enterprise backup solutions with immutable backup support and instant recovery capabilities
Common Scenarios
- LockBit Attack: Detected via SMB lateral movement and mass file encryption — isolate, scan for Cobalt Strike beacons
- BlackCat/ALPHV: Detected via ransomware note creation — check for data exfiltration via Rclone or Mega upload
- Conti/Royal: Detected via shadow copy deletion — check for prior BazarLoader/Emotet initial access
- RansomHub: Detected via anomalous process execution — investigate for compromised VPN or RDP credentials
- Play Ransomware: Detected via service account abuse — audit AD for newly created accounts and group membership changes
Output Format
RANSOMWARE PLAYBOOK EXECUTION — IR-2024-0500
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase 1 - Detection:
Alert: Mass file encryption detected on FILESERVER-03
Variant: LockBit 3.0 (confirmed via ID Ransomware)
MTTD: 12 minutes from first encryption to SOC alert
Phase 2 - Containment:
[DONE] FILESERVER-03 isolated via CrowdStrike at 14:35 UTC
[DONE] SMB blocked enterprise-wide via firewall emergency rule
[DONE] Compromised service account disabled in AD
MTTC: 23 minutes
Phase 3 - Eradication:
[DONE] 3 additional hosts with C2 beacon identified and isolated
[DONE] Cobalt Strike C2 domain (c2[.]evil[.]com) sinkholed
[DONE] Enterprise-wide IOC scan completed — no additional infections
Phase 4 - Recovery:
[DONE] FILESERVER-03 rebuilt from gold image
[DONE] Data restored from immutable Veeam backup (RPO: 4 hours)
[DONE] Systems monitored 72 hours — no reinfection
MTTR: 18 hours
Total Affected: 1 server, 3 workstations
Data Loss: 4 hours of file modifications (backup RPO)
Exfiltration: No evidence of data exfiltration confirmed
How to use building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★63 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
We added building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Luis Park· Dec 28, 2024
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Camila Abebe· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Luis Choi· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Luis Sharma· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Luis Shah· Nov 19, 2024
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Luis Farah· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Luis Chawla· Nov 7, 2024
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 63