static-analysis

mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills --skill static-analysis
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Guide agents through selecting, running, and triaging static analysis tools for C/C++ — clang-tidy, cppcheck, and scan-build — including suppression strategies and CI integration.

skill.md

Static Analysis

Purpose

Guide agents through selecting, running, and triaging static analysis tools for C/C++ — clang-tidy, cppcheck, and scan-build — including suppression strategies and CI integration.

Triggers

  • "How do I run clang-tidy on my project?"
  • "What clang-tidy checks should I enable?"
  • "cppcheck is reporting false positives — how do I suppress them?"
  • "How do I set up scan-build for deeper analysis?"
  • "My build is noisy with static analysis warnings"
  • "How do I generate compile_commands.json for clang-tidy?"

Workflow

1. Generate compile_commands.json

clang-tidy requires a compilation database:

# CMake (preferred)
cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON
ln -s build/compile_commands.json .

# Bear (for Make-based projects)
bear -- make

# compiledb (alternative for Make)
pip install compiledb
compiledb make

2. Run clang-tidy

# Single file
clang-tidy src/foo.c -- -std=c11 -I include/

# Whole project via compile_commands.json
run-clang-tidy -p build/ -j$(nproc)

# With specific checks enabled
clang-tidy -checks='bugprone-*,modernize-*,performance-*' src/foo.cpp

# Apply auto-fixes
clang-tidy -checks='modernize-use-nullptr' -fix src/foo.cpp

3. Check category decision tree

Goal?
├── Find real bugs            → bugprone-*, clang-analyzer-*
├── Modernise C++ code        → modernize-*
├── Follow core guidelines    → cppcoreguidelines-*
├── Catch performance issues  → performance-*
├── Security hardening        → cert-*, hicpp-*
└── Readability / style       → readability-*, llvm-*
Category Key checks What it catches
bugprone-* use-after-move, integer-division, suspicious-memset-usage Likely bugs
modernize-* use-nullptr, use-override, use-auto C++11/14/17 idioms
cppcoreguidelines-* avoid-goto, pro-bounds-*, no-malloc C++ Core Guidelines
performance-* unnecessary-copy-initialization, avoid-endl Performance regressions
clang-analyzer-* core.*, unix.*, security.* Path-sensitive bugs
cert-* err34-c, str51-cpp CERT coding standard

4. .clang-tidy configuration file

# .clang-tidy — place at project root
Checks: >
  bugprone-*,
  modernize-*,
  performance-*,
  -modernize-use-trailing-return-type,
  -bugprone-easily-swappable-parameters
WarningsAsErrors: 'bugprone-*,clang-analyzer-*'
HeaderFilterRegex: '^(src|include)/.*'
CheckOptions:
  - key: modernize-loop-convert.MinConfidence
    value: reasonable
  - key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase
    value: camelCase

5. Suppress false positives

// Suppress a single line
int result = riskyOp(); // NOLINT(bugprone-signed-char-misuse)

// Suppress a block
// NOLINTNEXTLINE(cppcoreguidelines-avoid-magic-numbers)
constexpr int BUFFER_SIZE = 4096;

// Suppress whole function
[[clang::suppress("bugprone-*")]]
void legacy_code() { /* ... */ }

Or in .clang-tidy:

# Exclude third-party directories
HeaderFilterRegex: '^(src|include)/.*'
# Disable specific checks
Checks: '-bugprone-easily-swappable-parameters'

6. Run cppcheck

# Basic run
cppcheck --enable=all --std=c11 src/

# With compile_commands.json
cppcheck --project=build/compile_commands.json

# Include specific checks and suppress noise
cppcheck --enable=warning,performance,portability \
         --suppress=missingIncludeSystem \
         --suppress=unmatchedSuppression \
         --error-exitcode=1 \
         src/

# Generate XML report for CI
cppcheck --xml --xml-version=2 src/ 2> cppcheck-report.xml
--enable= value What it checks
warning Undefined behaviour, bad practices
performance Redundant operations, inefficient patterns
portability Non-portable constructs
information Configuration and usage notes
all Everything above

7. Path-sensitive analysis with scan-build

# Intercept a Make build
scan-build make

# Intercept CMake build
scan-build cmake --build build/

# Show HTML report
scan-view /tmp/scan-build-*/

# With specific checkers
scan-build -enable-checker security.insecureAPI.gets \
           -enable-checker alpha.unix.cstring.BufferOverlap \
           make

scan-build finds deeper bugs than clang-tidy: use-after-free across functions, dead stores from logic errors, null dereferences on complex paths.

8. CI integration

# GitHub Actions
- name: Static analysis
  run: |
    cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON
    run-clang-tidy -p build -j$(nproc) -warnings-as-errors '*'

- name: cppcheck
  run: |
    cppcheck --enable=warning,performance \
             --suppress=missingIncludeSystem \
             --error-exitcode=1 \
             src/

For clang-tidy check details, see references/clang-tidy-checks.md.

Related skills

  • Use skills/compilers/clang for Clang toolchain and diagnostic flags
  • Use skills/compilers/gcc for GCC warnings as complementary analysis
  • Use skills/runtimes/sanitizers for runtime bug detection alongside static analysis
  • Use skills/build-systems/cmake for CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS setup
how to use static-analysis

How to use static-analysis on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add static-analysis
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills --skill static-analysis

The skills CLI fetches static-analysis from GitHub repository mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/static-analysis

Reload or restart Cursor to activate static-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /static-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.755 reviews
  • Ren Garcia· Dec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: static-analysis is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Noah Flores· Dec 16, 2024

    static-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sofia Menon· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for static-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Dev Menon· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend static-analysis for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Sofia Zhang· Nov 7, 2024

    static-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dev Rao· Oct 26, 2024

    Keeps context tight: static-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Sofia Mehta· Oct 26, 2024

    static-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Hana Jain· Oct 2, 2024

    static-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 21, 2024

    static-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Valentina Yang· Sep 21, 2024

    static-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 55

1 / 6