Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontooluniverse-clinical-trial-designExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design from mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design. Access via /tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
1.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
1.2K
stars
Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (drug names, disease names, biomarker names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
Trial design starts with the question, not the methods. Answer these four questions before running any tools — they determine everything else:
These four answers determine sample size, duration, and trial design. Look them up from precedent trials and FDA guidance — do not derive them from first principles.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume what the standard of care is for an indication — look it up with DrugBank and FDA tools. Never assume an endpoint is FDA-accepted — verify with search_clinical_trials precedents and OpenFDA_get_approval_history. Never estimate prevalence from memory — use OpenTargets, gnomAD, or COSMIC.
DO NOT show tool outputs to user. Instead:
[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md FIRST| Grade | Symbol | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3-star | Regulatory acceptance, multiple precedents | FDA-approved endpoint in same indication |
| B | 2-star | Clinical validation, single precedent | Phase 3 trial in related indication |
| C | 1-star | Preclinical or exploratory | Phase 1 use, biomarker validation ongoing |
| D | 0-star | Proposed, no validation | Novel endpoint, no precedent |
Weighted composite score:
Interpretation: >=75 HIGH (proceed), 50-74 MODERATE (additional validation), <50 LOW (de-risking required)
Apply when users:
Trigger phrases: "clinical trial design", "trial feasibility", "enrollment projections", "endpoint selection", "trial planning", "Phase 1/2 design", "basket trial", "biomarker trial"
Execute 6 parallel research dimensions. See STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md for detailed steps per path.
Trial Design Query
|
+-- PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
| Disease prevalence, biomarker prevalence, geographic distribution,
| eligibility criteria impact, enrollment projections
|
+-- PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
| Mutation frequency, testing availability, turnaround time,
| cost/reimbursement, alternative biomarkers
|
+-- PATH 3: Comparator Selection
| Standard of care, approved comparators, historical controls,
| placebo appropriateness, combination therapy
|
+-- PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
| Primary endpoint precedents, FDA acceptance history,
| measurement feasibility, surrogate vs clinical endpoints
|
+-- PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
| Mechanism-based toxicity, class effects, organ-specific monitoring,
| DLT history, safety monitoring plan
|
+-- PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
Regulatory precedents (505(b)(1), 505(b)(2)), breakthrough therapy,
orphan drug, fast track, FDA guidance
Create [INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md with all 14 sections. See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for full templates with fillable fields.
OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name - Disease lookupOpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl - Prevalence dataClinVar_search_variants - Biomarker mutation frequencygnomad_search_variants - Population allele frequenciesPubMed_search_articles - Epidemiology literaturesearch_clinical_trials - Enrollment feasibility from past trialsClinVar_get_variant_details - Variant pathogenicityCOSMIC_search_mutations - Cancer-specific mutation frequenciesgnomad_get_variant - Population geneticsPubMed_search_articles - CDx test performance, guidelinesdrugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id - Drug infodrugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Approved indicationsdrugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - MechanismFDA_OrangeBook_search_drug - Generic availabilityOpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approval detailssearch_clinical_trials - Historical control datasearch_clinical_trials - Precedent trials, endpoints usedPubMed_search_articles - FDA acceptance history, endpoint validationOpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approved endpoints by indicationdrugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Mechanism toxicityFDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name - FDA black box warningsFAERS_search_reports_by_drug_and_reaction - Real-world adverse eventsFAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event - AE frequencyFAERS_count_death_related_by_drug - Serious outcomesPubMed_search_articles - DLT definitions, monitoring strategiesOpenFDA_get_approval_history - Precedent approvalsPubMed_search_articles - Breakthrough designations, FDA guidancesearch_clinical_trials - Regulatory precedents (accelerated approval)from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse(use_cache=True)
tu.load_tools()
# Example: EGFR+ NSCLC trial feasibility
# Step 1: Disease prevalence
disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(
diseaseName="non-small cell lung cancer"
)
prevalence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes(
efoId=disease_info['data']['id']
)
# Step 2: Biomarker prevalence
variants = tu.tools.ClinVar_search_variants(gene="EGFR", significance="pathogenic")
# Step 3: Precedent trials
trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
condition="EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer",
status="completed", phase="2"
)
# Step 4: Standard of care comparator
soc = tu.tools.FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug(ingredient="osimertinib")
# Compile into feasibility report...
See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md for the complete 6-path Python workflow and use case examples.
When ToolUniverse tools return limited trial metadata, use the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API directly:
import requests, pandas as pd
# Search with pagination (all lung cancer immunotherapy trials with results)
all_studies = []
token = None
while True:
params = {"query.cond": "lung cancer", "query.intr": "immunotherapy",
"filter.overallStatus": "COMPLETED", "filter.results": "WITH_RESULTS", "pageSize": 100}
if token: params["pageToken"] = token
resp = requests.get("https://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies", params=params).json()
all_studies.extend(resp.get("studies", []))
token = resp.get("nextPageToken")
if not token: break
# Extract structured data
rows = []
for s in all_studies:
proto = s.get("protocolSection", {})
rows.append({
"nctId": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("nctId"),
"title": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("briefTitle"),
"enrollment": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("enrollmentInfo", {}).get("count"),
"phase": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases", [None])[0] if proto<Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
anthropics/claude-code
leonxlnx/taste-skill
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
erichowens/some_claude_skills
hyperb1iss/hyperskills
omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 60