为了执行本项技能，请严格按照以下步骤操作：
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionljg-roundtableExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches ljg-roundtable from lijigang/ljg-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate ljg-roundtable. Access via /ljg-roundtable in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
3
total installs
3
this week
2.8K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
3
installs
3
this week
2.8K
stars
为了执行本项技能，请严格按照以下步骤操作：
读取参考资料
读取 ~/.claude/skills/ljg-roundtable/references/original-prompt.org 了解原始框架设计意图。
解析议题 从用户输入中提取核心议题。如果用户只说"圆桌讨论"未给议题，询问议题。
选人：提议代表人物 根据议题，选择 3-5 位真实历史/当代人物作为代表，覆盖尽可能多的立场维度。每位人物需要：
选人原则：
开场：统一定义 以主持人身份开场，展示参会人物列表，然后提出定义性问题：
「在深入探讨之前，我们应当如何定义 [议题核心概念]？它的核心要素是什么？」
每位参会者依次发言，格式为：
【人物名】【行动标签】：发言内容
**简言之**：一句话总结
行动标签包括：陈述、质疑、补充、反驳、修正、综合
对话循环 每轮执行以下流程：
5a. 动态发言轮
**简言之**： 一句话压缩5b. 主持人综述 发言结束后，主持人做三件事：
ASCII 图的设计原则：
5c. 用户指令 综述后展示指令菜单：
【主持】：(指令: 可 / 止 / 深入此节 / 引入新人物)
指令含义：
可：接受下一层问题，继续推进止：结束讨论，进入总结深入此节：不推进新问题，继续围绕当前争议点深挖引入新人物：用户指定一位新人物加入（主持人介绍并请其就当前话题表态）结束：生成知识网络
用户发出 止 指令后：
写入 org 文件（完整保存，一字不差） 将讨论全部原文写入 org-mode 文件，不压缩、不删减、不改写任何发言内容：
date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S 获取时间戳~/Documents/notes/{timestamp}--圆桌-{议题关键词}__roundtable.org#+title: 圆桌：{议题}
#+date: [{日期}]
#+filetags: :roundtable:
* 议题与参会者
[完整的参会者介绍，包括姓名、MBTI、立场、选择理由]
* 开场：定义
[主持人开场词 + 每位参会者的完整定义性发言，原文照录]
* 各轮讨论记录
** 第 N 轮：{引导问题}
*** 发言记录
[本轮所有发言的完整原文，包括行动标签、全部论述、简言之]
*** 主持人综述
[核心争议点 + ASCII 框架图 + 下一层引导问题，原文照录]
* 知识网络（全局）
[完整的全局总结 + ASCII 知识网络图]
* 开放问题
[所有未解决的开放问题]
**简言之** 一句话压到极致Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
We added ljg-roundtable from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
ljg-roundtable has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for ljg-roundtable matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend ljg-roundtable for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ljg-roundtable is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
ljg-roundtable is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
ljg-roundtable reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Useful defaults in ljg-roundtable — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for ljg-roundtable matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: ljg-roundtable is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 70