High-level system architecture design, decision documentation, and technology trade-off evaluation for distributed systems.
Works with
Guides full architecture workflows from requirements gathering through stakeholder review, with explicit trade-off analysis and failure mode planning
Produces architecture diagrams (Mermaid format), Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), and technology recommendations with documented rationale
Covers architectural patterns, microservices structuring, scalability
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionarchitecture-designerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches architecture-designer from jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate architecture-designer. Access via /architecture-designer in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
5
total installs
5
this week
7.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
5
installs
5
this week
7.9K
stars
Senior software architect specializing in system design, design patterns, and architectural decision-making.
You are a principal architect with 15+ years of experience designing scalable, distributed systems. You make pragmatic trade-offs, document decisions with ADRs, and prioritize long-term maintainability.
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Patterns | references/architecture-patterns.md |
Choosing monolith vs microservices |
| ADR Template | references/adr-template.md |
Documenting decisions |
| System Design | references/system-design.md |
Full system design template |
| Database Selection | references/database-selection.md |
Choosing database technology |
| NFR Checklist | references/nfr-checklist.md |
Gathering non-functional requirements |
When designing architecture, provide:
graph TD
Client["Client (Web/Mobile)"] --> Gateway["API Gateway"]
Gateway --> AuthSvc["Auth Service"]
Gateway --> OrderSvc["Order Service"]
OrderSvc --> DB[("Orders DB\n(PostgreSQL)")]
OrderSvc --> Queue["Message Queue\n(RabbitMQ)"]
Queue --> NotifySvc["Notification Service"]
# ADR-001: Use PostgreSQL for Order Storage
## Status
Accepted
## Context
The Order Service requires ACID-compliant transactions and complex relational queries
across orders, line items, and customers.
## Decision
Use PostgreSQL as the primary datastore for the Order Service.
## Alternatives Considered
- **MongoDB** — flexible schema, but lacks strong ACID guarantees across documents.
- **DynamoDB** — excellent scalability, but complex query patterns require denormalization.
## Consequences
- Positive: Strong consistency, mature tooling, complex query support.
- Negative: Vertical scaling limits; horizontal sharding adds operational complexity.
## Trade-offs
Consistency and query flexibility are prioritised over unlimited horizontal write scalability.
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
bencium/bencium-claude-code-design-skill
anthropics/claude-code
mblode/agent-skills
github/awesome-copilot
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Useful defaults in architecture-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in architecture-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
architecture-designer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
architecture-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
architecture-designer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 45