tauri
Tauri lets you build desktop (and mobile) apps with a Rust Core process and a frontend running in the OS WebView. Use these skills when scaffolding projects, wiring commands and events, configuring capabilities and permissions, or authoring plugins.
Works with
1
total installs
1
this week
10
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
10
stars
Installation Guide
How to use tauri on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
tauri
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tauri from hairyf/skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tauri. Access via /tauri in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Tauri lets you build desktop (and mobile) apps with a Rust Core process and a frontend running in the OS WebView. Use these skills when scaffolding projects, wiring commands and events, configuring capabilities and permissions, or authoring plugins.
The skill is based on Tauri v2, generated at 2026-01-30.
Core References
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Core crates, WRY/TAO, tooling, plugins | core-architecture |
| IPC | Events (fire-and-forget) vs Commands (invoke/response), when to use each | core-ipc |
| Process Model | Core process vs WebView processes, security implications | core-process-model |
| Project Structure | src-tauri layout, tauri.conf.json, capabilities, build flow | core-project-structure |
| App Size | Why small, Cargo release profile (LTO, strip, opt-level) | concept-size |
| IPC Patterns | Brownfield (default) vs Isolation (sandbox, encrypt) | concept-ipc-patterns |
Start
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Create Project | create-tauri-app vs tauri init, dev server URL | start-create-project |
| Prerequisites | System deps, Rust, Node, WebView2, mobile (Android/iOS) | start-prerequisites |
| Frontend | Static host model, Vite/Next/Nuxt/SvelteKit/Leptos/Trunk | start-frontend |
| Migrate | Upgrading from Tauri 1.x or 2 beta, migrate command | start-migrate |
Develop
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration Files | tauri.conf.json, platform overrides, Cargo.toml, package.json | develop-configuration-files |
| Commands | #[tauri::command], invoke, args, errors, async, State, channels | develop-commands |
| Events and Channels | Emit/listen, global vs webview-specific, streaming with Channel | develop-events-and-channels |
| State Management | app.manage(), State<T> in commands, Mutex | develop-state-management |
| Windows | Creating windows (config vs WebviewWindowBuilder), label, url, visible | develop-windows |
| Icons | tauri icon command, bundle.icon, platform formats | develop-icons |
| Resources | Bundled resources, resolve path, $RESOURCE, fs permissions | develop-resources |
| Sidecar | externalBin, shell plugin, spawn from Rust/JS, permissions | develop-sidecar |
| Debug | dev vs build, Rust console, WebView devtools, RUST_BACKTRACE | develop-debug |
| Tests | Mock runtime, WebDriver E2E, CI | develop-tests |
| Tests Mocking | mockIPC, mockWindows, clearMocks (frontend tests) | develop-tests-mocking |
| Tests WebDriver | tauri-driver, platform drivers, Selenium/WebdriverIO, CI | develop-tests-webdriver |
| Updating Dependencies | npm/Cargo version sync, tauri and plugins | develop-updating-dependencies |
| Plugins Mobile | Android (Kotlin), iOS (Swift), desktop vs mobile impl | develop-plugins-mobile |
Security
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Which permissions apply to which windows; capability files, remote, platforms | security-capabilities |
| Permissions | Allow/deny commands, scopes, permission sets; plugin vs app permissions | security-permissions |
| Scopes | allow/deny per command or global, path/URL patterns | security-scope |
| CSP | Content Security Policy config, script-src, style-src | security-csp |
| HTTP Headers | CORS, COOP, Permissions-Policy for webview responses | security-http-headers |
| Runtime Authority | Core enforces permissions on every invoke; denied = never run | security-runtime-authority |
Best Practices
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Security Lifecycle | Upstream, development, build, runtime; deps, audit, dev server | best-practices-security-lifecycle |
| Writing Plugin Permissions | Autogenerated allow/deny, permission files, default set, scope schema | best-practices-writing-plugin-permissions |
Features
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Plugins | Plugin development, lifecycle hooks, commands, permissions, state | features-plugins |
| Official Plugins Overview | dialog, fs, shell, store, updater, and others; when to use which | features-official-plugins-overview |
| Deep Linking | Custom URL scheme, App/Universal Links, single-instance + argv | features-deep-linking |
| Updater | In-app updates — check, download, install, signing, static/dynamic endpoints | features-updater |
Distribute
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Packaging | build, bundle, installers (DMG, MSI, AppImage, etc.), signing overview | distribute-packaging |
| Signing | Code signing per platform (macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS) | distribute-signing |
| Pipelines | GitHub Actions (tauri-action), CI signing, CrabNebula Cloud | distribute-pipelines |
Learn
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Menus and Tray | Window menu, system tray, Menu/TrayIcon, predefined items | learn-windows-menus-tray |
| Window Customization | Custom titlebar, decorations, data-tauri-drag-region, transparent (macOS) | learn-window-customization |
| Splashscreen | Extra window, visible/hidden main, setup tasks, close when ready | learn-splashscreen |
| Sidecar Node.js | Node app as binary (pkg), externalBin, shell plugin | learn-sidecar-nodejs |
| Using Plugin Permissions | Add plugin, capability, allow commands, default permissions | learn-using-plugin-permissions |
| Capabilities per Window/Platform | Different capabilities per window; platforms array | learn-capabilities-windows-platforms |
Reference
| Topic | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| CLI | dev, build, icon, init, migrate, bundle | reference-cli |
| Environment Variables | CI, config depth, signing, Apple/Windows/Linux, hook env | reference-environment-variables |
| WebView Versions | WebView2 (Windows), WKWebView (macOS/iOS), WebKitGTK (Linux) | reference-webview-versions |
| Core Permissions (ACL) | core:default, app, event, window, path, menu, tray, resources | reference-acl-core-permissions |
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
384mattpocock/skills
premortem
197parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
deslop
118cursor/plugins
framer-motion
98pproenca/dot-skills
write-a-prd
91mattpocock/skills
travel-planner
89ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Reviews
- IIra Khan★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for tauri matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- AAma Smith★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: tauri is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- SSakura Kapoor★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
tauri reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
I recommend tauri for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in tauri — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AAisha Agarwal★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
We added tauri from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ZZaid Okafor★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
tauri fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAva Brown★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
tauri has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- AAva Thompson★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in tauri — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
tauri has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 43
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.