adk-eval-guide▌
google/adk-docs · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Comprehensive evaluation methodology guide for ADK agents covering metrics, schemas, and iteration workflows.
- ›Provides eight evaluation criteria (tool trajectory, response matching, rubric-based scoring, hallucination detection, safety) with configurable thresholds and judge model options
- ›Includes evalset schema documentation with multi-turn conversation support, tool use trajectory specification, and session state initialization patterns
- ›Outlines the eval-fix loop: start small, run
ADK Evaluation Guide
Scaffolded project? If you used
/adk-scaffold, you already havemake eval,tests/eval/evalsets/, andtests/eval/eval_config.json. Start withmake evaland iterate from there.Non-scaffolded? Use
adk evaldirectly — see Running Evaluations below.
Reference Files
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
references/criteria-guide.md |
Complete metrics reference — all 8 criteria, match types, custom metrics, judge model config |
references/user-simulation.md |
Dynamic conversation testing — ConversationScenario, user simulator config, compatible metrics |
references/builtin-tools-eval.md |
google_search and model-internal tools — trajectory behavior, metric compatibility |
references/multimodal-eval.md |
Multimodal inputs — evalset schema, built-in metric limitations, custom evaluator pattern |
The Eval-Fix Loop
Evaluation is iterative. When a score is below threshold, diagnose the cause, fix it, rerun — don't just report the failure.
How to iterate
- Start small: Begin with 1-2 eval cases, not the full suite
- Run eval:
make eval(oradk evalif no Makefile) - Read the scores — identify what failed and why
- Fix the code — adjust prompts, tool logic, instructions, or the evalset
- Rerun eval — verify the fix worked
- Repeat steps 3-5 until the case passes
- Only then add more eval cases and expand coverage
Expect 5-10+ iterations. This is normal — each iteration makes the agent better.
What to fix when scores fail
| Failure | What to change |
|---|---|
tool_trajectory_avg_score low |
Fix agent instructions (tool ordering), update evalset tool_uses, or switch to IN_ORDER/ANY_ORDER match type |
response_match_score low |
Adjust agent instruction wording, or relax the expected response |
final_response_match_v2 low |
Refine agent instructions, or adjust expected response — this is semantic, not lexical |
rubric_based score low |
Refine agent instructions to address the specific rubric that failed |
hallucinations_v1 low |
Tighten agent instructions to stay grounded in tool output |
| Agent calls wrong tools | Fix tool descriptions, agent instructions, or tool_config |
| Agent calls extra tools | Use IN_ORDER/ANY_ORDER match type, add strict stop instructions, or switch to rubric_based_tool_use_quality_v1 |
Choosing the Right Criteria
| Goal | Recommended Metric |
|---|---|
| Regression testing / CI/CD (fast, deterministic) | tool_trajectory_avg_score + response_match_score |
| Semantic response correctness (flexible phrasing OK) | final_response_match_v2 |
| Response quality without reference answer | rubric_based_final_response_quality_v1 |
| Validate tool usage reasoning | rubric_based_tool_use_quality_v1 |
| Detect hallucinated claims | hallucinations_v1 |
| Safety compliance | safety_v1 |
| Dynamic multi-turn conversations | User simulation + hallucinations_v1 / safety_v1 (see references/user-simulation.md) |
| Multimodal input (image, audio, file) | tool_trajectory_avg_score + custom metric for response quality (see references/multimodal-eval.md) |
For the complete metrics reference with config examples, match types, and custom metrics, see references/criteria-guide.md.
Running Evaluations
# Scaffolded projects:
make eval EVALSET=tests/eval/evalsets/my_evalset.json
# Or directly via ADK CLI:
adk eval ./app <path_to_evalset.json> --config_file_path=<path_to_config.json> --print_detailed_results
# Run specific eval cases from a set:
adk eval ./app my_evalset.json:eval_1,eval_2
# With GCS storage:
adk eval ./app my_evalset.json --eval_storage_uri gs://my-bucket/evals
CLI options: --config_file_path, --print_detailed_results, --eval_storage_uri, --log_level
Eval set management:
adk eval_set create <agent_path> <eval_set_id>
adk eval_set add_eval_case <agent_path> <eval_set_id> --scenarios_file <path> --session_input_file <path>
Configuration Schema (eval_config.json)
Both camelCase and snake_case field names are accepted (Pydantic aliases). The examples below use snake_case, matching the official ADK docs.
Full example
{
"criteria": {
"tool_trajectory_avg_score": {
"threshold": 1.0,
"match_type": "IN_ORDER"
},
"final_response_match_v2": {
"threshold": 0.8,
"judge_model_options": {
"judge_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
"num_samples": 5
}
},
"rubric_based_final_response_quality_v1": {
"threshold": 0.8,
"rubrics": [
{
"rubric_id": "professionalism",
"rubric_content": { "text_property": "The response must be professional and helpful." }
},
{
"rubric_id": "safety",
"rubric_content": { "text_property": "The agent must NEVER book without asking for confirmation." }
}
]
}
}
}
Simple threshold shorthand is also valid: "response_match_score": 0.8
For custom metrics, judge_model_options details, and user_simulator_config, see references/criteria-guide.md.
EvalSet Schema (evalset.json)
{
"eval_set_id": "my_eval_set",
"name": "My Eval Set",
"description": "Tests core capabilities",
"eval_cases": [
{
"eval_id": "search_test",
"conversation": [
{
"invocation_id": "inv_1",
"user_content": { "parts": [{ "text": "Find a flight to NYC" }] },
"final_response": {
"role": "model",
"parts": [{ "text": "I found a flight for $500. Want to book?" }]
},
"intermediate_data": {
"tool_uses": [
{ "name": "search_flights", "args": { "destination": "NYC" } }
],
"intermediate_responses": [
["sub_agent_name", [{ "text": "Found 3 flights to NYC." }]]
]
}
}
],
"session_input": { "app_name": "my_app", "user_id": "user_1", "state": {} }
}
]
}
Key fields:
intermediate_data.tool_uses— expected tool call trajectory (chronological order)intermediate_data.intermediate_responses— expected sub-agent responses (for multi-agent systems)session_input.state— initial session state (overrides Python-level initialization)conversation_scenario— alternative toconversationfor user simulation (seereferences/user-simulation.md)
Common Gotchas
The Proactivity Trajectory Gap
LLMs often perform extra actions not asked for (e.g., google_search after save_preferences). This causes tool_trajectory_avg_score failures with EXACT match. Solutions:
- Use
IN_ORDERorANY_ORDERmatch type — tolerates extra tool calls between expected ones - Include ALL tools the agent might call in your expected trajectory
- Use
rubric_based_tool_use_quality_v1instead of trajectory matching - Add strict stop instructions: "Stop after calling save_preferences. Do NOT search."
Multi-turn conversations require tool_uses for ALL turns
The tool_trajectory_avg_score evaluates each invocation. If you don't specify expected tool calls for intermediate turns, the evaluation will fail even if the agent called the right tools.
{
"conversation": [
{
"invocation_id": "inv_1",
"user_content": { "parts": [{"text": "Find me a flight from NYC to London"}] },
"intermediate_data": {
"tool_uses": [
{ "name": "search_flights", "args": {"origin": "NYC", "destination": "LON"} }
]
}
},
{
"invocation_id": "inv_2",
"user_content": { "parts": [{"text": "Book the first option"}] },
"final_response": { "role": how to use adk-eval-guideHow to use adk-eval-guide on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add adk-eval-guide
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/google/adk-docs --skill adk-eval-guideThe skills CLI fetches adk-eval-guide from GitHub repository google/adk-docs and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/adk-eval-guideReload or restart Cursor to activate adk-eval-guide. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /adk-eval-guide) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
✓Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
✓Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
✓Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.7★★★★★44 reviews- ★★★★★Aarav Smith· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend adk-eval-guide for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Zhang· Dec 16, 2024
adk-eval-guide is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in adk-eval-guide — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Aditi Chen· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: adk-eval-guide is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sofia Liu· Nov 23, 2024
We added adk-eval-guide from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Aanya Smith· Nov 7, 2024
adk-eval-guide reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aanya Reddy· Oct 26, 2024
Registry listing for adk-eval-guide matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★William Sethi· Oct 14, 2024
adk-eval-guide fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Garcia· Sep 25, 2024
I recommend adk-eval-guide for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ama Martinez· Sep 17, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: adk-eval-guide is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 44
1 / 5