Security review for TypeScript/Node.js applications. Evaluates code against OWASP Top 10, framework-specific patterns, and production-readiness criteria. Findings are classified by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with remediation examples. Delegates to the typescript-security-expert agent for deep analysis.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill typescript-security-reviewCompatible with
Supported agents
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontypescript-security-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill typescript-security-reviewFetches typescript-security-review from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/typescript-security-review
Restart Cursor to activate typescript-security-review. Access via /typescript-security-reviewin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
tailwind-css-patterns
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · Frontend · same repo
typescript-best-practices
jwynia/agent-skills · Backend · tag: typescript
python-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Backend · tag: review
improve
shadcn/improve · code · tag: security
systematic-literature-review
huangwb8/chineseresearchlatex · Productivity · tag: review
security-best-practices
supercent-io/skills-template · Productivity · tag: security
Useful defaults in typescript-security-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: typescript-security-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for typescript-security-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Registry listing for typescript-security-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
typescript-security-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
typescript-security-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added typescript-security-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 63