Security review for TypeScript/Node.js applications. Evaluates code against OWASP Top 10, framework-specific patterns, and production-readiness criteria. Findings are classified by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with remediation examples. Delegates to the typescript-security-expert agent for deep analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontypescript-security-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches typescript-security-review from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate typescript-security-review. Access via /typescript-security-review in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
1
total installs
1
this week
194
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
194
stars
Security review for TypeScript/Node.js applications. Evaluates code against OWASP Top 10, framework-specific patterns, and production-readiness criteria. Findings are classified by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with remediation examples. Delegates to the typescript-security-expert agent for deep analysis.
Identify Scope: Determine which files and modules are under review. Prioritize authentication, authorization, data handling, API endpoints, and configuration files. Use grep to find security-sensitive patterns (eval, exec, innerHTML, password handling, JWT operations).
Checkpoint: Verify at least 3 security-sensitive files/modules identified before proceeding.
Check Authentication & Authorization: Review JWT implementation (signing algorithm, expiration, refresh tokens), OAuth2/OIDC integration, session management, password hashing (bcrypt/argon2), and multi-factor authentication. Verify protected routes enforce authentication.
Checkpoint: Use grep to confirm all route handlers have auth guards or middleware applied.
Scan for Injection Vulnerabilities: Check for SQL/NoSQL injection in database queries, command injection in exec/spawn, template injection, and LDAP injection. Verify parameterized queries and input validation.
Checkpoint: Use grep to confirm all database queries use parameterization — no string concatenation with user input.
Review Input Validation: Check API inputs validated with Zod, Joi, or class-validator. Verify schema completeness — proper type constraints, length limits, format validation. Check for validation bypass paths.
Checkpoint: Verify all public API endpoints have corresponding validation schemas.
Assess XSS Prevention: Review React components for dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage, check Content Security Policy headers, verify HTML sanitization for user-generated content. See references/xss-prevention.md for detailed patterns.
Checkpoint: Use grep to confirm any dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage has sanitization via DOMPurify or equivalent.
Check Secrets Management: Scan for hardcoded credentials, API keys, secrets in source code. Verify .env files are gitignored, secrets accessed through proper management services.
Checkpoint: Run grep -r "password\|secret\|api.*key\|token" --include="*.ts" to identify potential secrets in code.
Review Dependency Security: Run npm audit or check package-lock.json for known vulnerabilities. Identify outdated dependencies with CVEs. Check for unnecessary dependencies.
Checkpoint: Verify npm audit results are reviewed and critical vulnerabilities addressed.
Evaluate Security Headers & Configuration: Check helmet.js or manual security header configuration. Review CORS policy, rate limiting, HTTPS enforcement, cookie security flags (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite), and CSP. See references/security-headers.md for configuration examples.
Checkpoint: Use grep to confirm helmet or equivalent security headers are applied globally.
Produce Security Report: Generate structured report with severity-classified findings, remediation guidance with code examples, and security posture summary.
Feedback Loop: If Critical or High vulnerabilities found, re-scan related modules for similar patterns before finalizing. Use grep to identify if the same vulnerability pattern exists elsewhere.
// ❌ Critical: Weak JWT configuration
import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken';
const SECRET = 'mysecret123'; // Hardcoded weak secret
function generateToken(user: User) {
return jwt.sign({ id: user.id, role: user.role }, SECRET);
// Missing expiration, weak secret, no algorithm specification
}
// ✅ Secure: Proper JWT configuration
import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken';
const JWT_SECRET = process.env.JWT_SECRET;
if (!JWT_SECRET || JWT_SECRET.length < 32) {
throw new Error('JWT_SECRET must be set and at least 32 characters');
}
function generateToken(user: User): string {
return jwt.sign(
{ sub: user.id }, // Minimal claims, no sensitive data
JWT_SECRET,
{
algorithm: 'HS256',
expiresIn: '15m',
issuer: 'my-app',
audience: 'my-app-client',
}
);
}
function verifyToken(token: string): JwtPayload {
return jwt.verify(token, JWT_SECRET, {
algorithms: ['HS256'], // Restrict accepted algorithms
issuer: 'my-app',
audience: 'my-app-client',
}) as JwtPayload;
}
// ❌ Critical: SQL injection vulnerability
async function findUser(email: string) {
const result = await db.query(
`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`
);
return result.rows[0];
}
// ✅ Secure: Parameterized query
async function findUser(email: string) {
const result = await db.query(
'SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE email = $1',
[email]
);
return result.rows[0];
}
// ✅ Secure: ORM with type-safe queries (Drizzle example)
async function findUser(email: string) {
return db.select({
id: users.id,
name: users.name,
email: users.email,
})
.from(users)
.where(eq(users.email, email))
.limit(1);
}
See references/xss-prevention.md for XSS patterns and references/security-headers.md for security headers configuration.
Structure all security review findings as follows:
Overall security assessment score (1-10) with key observations and risk level.
Issues that can be exploited to compromise the system, steal data, or cause unauthorized access.
Security misconfigurations, missing protections, or vulnerabilities requiring near-term remediation.
Issues that reduce security posture but have mitigating factors or limited exploitability.
Security improvements, hardening recommendations, and defense-in-depth enhancements.
Well-implemented security patterns and practices to acknowledge.
Prioritized action items with code examples for the most critical fixes.
HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strictnpm audit in CI pipelines to catch dependency vulnerabilitiesSee the references/ directory for detailed security documentation:
references/owasp-typescript.md — OWASP Top 10 mapped to TypeScript/Node.js patternsreferences/common-vulnerabilities.md — Common vulnerability patterns and remediationreferences/dependency-security.md — Dependency scanning and supply chain securityreferences/xss-prevention.md — XSS prevention patterns for React and server-sidereferences/security-headers.md — Security headers and CORS configuration examplesreferences/input-validation.md — Input validation patterns with Zod and class-validatorPrerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit
jwynia/agent-skills
wispbit-ai/skills
shadcn/improve
schalkneethling/webdev-agent-skills
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Useful defaults in typescript-security-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: typescript-security-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for typescript-security-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Registry listing for typescript-security-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
typescript-security-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
typescript-security-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
typescript-security-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added typescript-security-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 63