Visual inspection and source-level fixing of website design issues across responsive, accessibility, and layout concerns.
Works with
Detects layout overflow, alignment problems, responsive breakpoints, accessibility contrast issues, and visual inconsistencies across mobile (375px), tablet (768px), desktop (1280px), and wide (1920px) viewports
Supports static sites, SPAs (React/Vue/Angular/Svelte), full-stack frameworks (Next.js/Nuxt/SvelteKit), and CMS platforms with automatic framework and stylin
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionweb-design-reviewerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches web-design-reviewer from github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate web-design-reviewer. Access via /web-design-reviewer in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
1
total installs
1
this week
28.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
28.7K
stars
This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.
Target website must be running
http://localhost:3000)Browser automation must be available
Access to source code (when making fixes)
flowchart TD
A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
E -->|Yes| B
E -->|No| F[Completion Report]
If the URL is not provided, ask the user:
Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000)
When making fixes, gather the following information:
| Item | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Framework | Are you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.? |
| Styling Method | CSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc. |
| Source Location | Where are style files and components located? |
| Review Scope | Specific pages only or entire site? |
Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:
Detection targets:
├── package.json → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config → Next.js
├── vite.config → Vite
├── nuxt.config → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/ → Source directory
| Method | Detection | Edit Target |
|---|---|---|
| Pure CSS | *.css files |
Global CSS or component CSS |
| SCSS/Sass | *.scss, *.sass |
SCSS files |
| CSS Modules | *.module.css |
Module CSS files |
| Tailwind CSS | tailwind.config.* |
className in components |
| styled-components | styled. in code |
JS/TS files |
| Emotion | @emotion/ imports |
JS/TS files |
| CSS-in-JS (other) | Inline styles | JS/TS files |
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Element Overflow | Content overflows from parent element or viewport | High |
| Element Overlap | Unintended overlapping of elements | High |
| Alignment Issues | Grid or flex alignment problems | Medium |
| Inconsistent Spacing | Padding/margin inconsistencies | Medium |
| Text Clipping | Long text not handled properly | Medium |
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Non-mobile Friendly | Layout breaks on small screens | High |
| Breakpoint Issues | Unnatural transitions when screen size changes | Medium |
| Touch Targets | Buttons too small on mobile | Medium |
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient Contrast | Low contrast ratio between text and background | High |
| No Focus State | Cannot determine state during keyboard navigation | High |
| Missing alt Text | No alternative text for images | Medium |
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Font Inconsistency | Mixed font families | Medium |
| Color Inconsistency | Non-unified brand colors | Medium |
| Spacing Inconsistency | Non-uniform spacing between similar elements | Low |
Test at the following viewports:
| Name | Width | Representative Device |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE/12 mini |
| Tablet | 768px | iPad |
| Desktop | 1280px | Standard PC |
| Wide | 1920px | Large display |
block-beta
columns 1
block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
end
Identify source files from problematic elements:
Selector-based Search
grep_searchComponent-based Search
semantic_searchFile Pattern Filtering
Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/*
Components: src/components/**/*
Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
See references/framework-fixes.md for details.
flowchart TD
A{Issues Remaining?}
A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]
Iteration Limit: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user
# Web Design Review Results
## Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |
## Detected Issues
### [P1] {Issue Title}
- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After
### [P2] {Issue Title}
...
## Unfixed Issues (if any)
### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}
## Recommendations
- {Suggestions for future improvements}
| Capability | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Web Page Navigation | Access URLs, page transitions | ✅ |
| Screenshot Capture | Page image capture | ✅ |
| Image Analysis | Visual issue detection | ✅ |
| DOM Retrieval | Page structure retrieval | Recommended |
| File Read/Write | Source code reading and editing | Required for fixes |
| Code Search | Code search within project | Required for fixes |
Playwright MCP is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.
| Capability | Playwright MCP Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation | browser_navigate |
Access URLs |
| Snapshot | browser_snapshot |
Retrieve DOM structure |
| Screenshot | browser_take_screenshot |
Images for visual inspection |
| Click | browser_click |
Interact with interactive elements |
| Resize | browser_resize |
Responsive testing |
| Console | browser_console_messages |
Detect JS errors |
{
"mcpServers": {
"playwright": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
}
}
}
| Tool | Features |
|---|---|
| Selenium | Broad browser support, multi-language support |
| Puppeteer | Chrome/Chromium focused, Node.js |
| Cypress | Easy integration with E2E testing |
| WebDriver BiDi | Standardized next-generation protocol |
The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.
package.jsonPrerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
anthropics/claude-code
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
leonxlnx/taste-skill
erichowens/some_claude_skills
web-design-reviewer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
web-design-reviewer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
web-design-reviewer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
I recommend web-design-reviewer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: web-design-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Useful defaults in web-design-reviewer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
web-design-reviewer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added web-design-reviewer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: web-design-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
web-design-reviewer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 26