Analyzes project folder structures across multiple technology stacks and generates comprehensive organization blueprints.
Works with
Auto-detects project types (.NET, Java, React, Angular, Python, Node.js, Flutter) and identifies architectural patterns including monorepos, microservices, and frontend components
Generates detailed blueprints with customizable visualization styles (ASCII tree, markdown lists, or tables) and configurable depth levels
Documents file placement patterns, naming conve
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionfolder-structure-blueprint-generatorExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches folder-structure-blueprint-generator from github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate folder-structure-blueprint-generator. Access via /folder-structure-blueprint-generator in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
28.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
28.7K
stars
${PROJECT_TYPE="Auto-detect|.NET|Java|React|Angular|Python|Node.js|Flutter|Other"}
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES="Auto-detect|true|false"}
${INCLUDES_FRONTEND="Auto-detect|true|false"}
${IS_MONOREPO="Auto-detect|true|false"}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE="ASCII|Markdown List|Table"}
${DEPTH_LEVEL=1-5}
${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS=true|false}
${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS=true|false}
${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS=true|false}
${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES=true|false}
"Analyze the project's folder structure and create a comprehensive 'Project_Folders_Structure_Blueprint.md' document that serves as a definitive guide for maintaining consistent code organization. Use the following approach:
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "Begin by scanning the folder structure for key files that identify the project type:
${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? "Determine if this is a monorepo by looking for:
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? "Check for microservices architecture indicators:
${INCLUDES_FRONTEND == "Auto-detect" ? "Identify frontend components by looking for:
Provide a high-level overview of the ${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "detected project type(s)" : PROJECT_TYPE} project's organization principles and folder structure:
${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? "If detected as a monorepo, explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : IS_MONOREPO ? "Explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : ""}
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? "If microservices are detected, describe how they are structured and organized." : INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES ? "Describe how the microservices are structured and organized." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "ASCII" ? "Create an ASCII tree representation of the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Markdown List" ? "Use nested markdown lists to represent the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Table" ? "Create a table with columns for Path, Purpose, Content Types, and Conventions." : ""}
${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS ? "Include all folders including generated ones." : "Exclude auto-generated folders like bin/, obj/, node_modules/, etc."}
Document each significant directory's purpose, contents, and patterns:
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "For each detected technology, analyze directory structures based on observed usage patterns:" : ""}
${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### .NET Project Structure (if detected)
Solution Organization:
Project Organization:
Domain/Feature Organization:
Layer Organization:
Configuration Management:
Test Project Organization:
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "React" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Angular" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### UI Project Structure (if detected)
Component Organization:
State Management:
Routing Organization:
API Integration:
Asset Management:
Style Organization:
${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS ? "Document the patterns that determine where different types of files should be placed:
Configuration Files:
Model/Entity Definitions:
Business Logic:
Interface Definitions:
Test Files:
Documentation Files:
Document the naming and organizational conventions observed across the project:
File Naming Patterns:
Folder Naming Patterns:
Namespace/Module Patterns:
Organizational Patterns:
Provide guidance for navigating and working with the codebase structure:
Entry Points:
Common Development Tasks:
Dependency Patterns:
${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS ? "- Content Statistics:
Document the build process and output organization:
Build Configuration:
Output Structure:
Environment-Specific Builds:
${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### .NET-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
Project File Organization:
Assembly Organization:
Resource Organization:
Package Management:
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Java" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### Java-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
Package Hierarchy:
Build Tool Organization:
Resource Organization:
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Node.js" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### Node.js-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
Module Organization:
Script Organization:
Configuration Management:
Document how the project structure is designed to be extended:
Extension Points:
Scalability Patterns:
Refactoring Patterns:
${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES ? "### 10. Structure Templates
Provide templates for creating new components that follow project conventions:
New Feature Template:
New Component Template:
New Service Template:
New Test Structure:
Document how the project structure is maintained and enforced:
Structure Validation:
Documentation Practices:
Include a section at the end about maintaining this blueprint and when it was last updated. "
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
folder-structure-blueprint-generator fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for folder-structure-blueprint-generator matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: folder-structure-blueprint-generator is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added folder-structure-blueprint-generator from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
folder-structure-blueprint-generator reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
folder-structure-blueprint-generator has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: folder-structure-blueprint-generator is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
I recommend folder-structure-blueprint-generator for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: folder-structure-blueprint-generator is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
folder-structure-blueprint-generator is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 62