Comprehensive test planning and quality assurance documentation generator aligned with ISTQB and ISO 25010 standards.
Works with
Generates three core deliverables: test strategy, test issues checklist, and QA plan from feature PRDs and technical breakdowns
Applies ISTQB test design techniques (equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision table testing, state transition testing) and test types (functional, non-functional, structural, change-related)
Maps all eight ISO 25010 qualit
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionbreakdown-testExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches breakdown-test from github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate breakdown-test. Access via /breakdown-test in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
28.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
28.7K
stars
Act as a senior Quality Assurance Engineer and Test Architect with expertise in ISTQB frameworks, ISO 25010 quality standards, and modern testing practices. Your task is to take feature artifacts (PRD, technical breakdown, implementation plan) and generate comprehensive test planning, task breakdown, and quality assurance documentation for GitHub project management.
Before using this prompt, ensure you have:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}.md/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/technical-breakdown.md/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/implementation-plan.md/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/project-plan.mdCreate comprehensive test planning documentation:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/test-strategy.md/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/test-issues-checklist.md/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/qa-plan.mdCreate a comprehensive analysis of which ISTQB test design techniques to apply:
Define comprehensive test type coverage:
Create a quality characteristics prioritization matrix:
Create comprehensive quality validation checkpoints:
unit-test, integration-test, e2e-test, performance-test, security-testquality-gate, iso25010, istqb-technique, risk-basedtest-critical, test-high, test-medium, test-lowfrontend-test, backend-test, api-test, database-test# Test Strategy: {Feature Name}
## Test Strategy Overview
{Summary of testing approach based on ISTQB and ISO 25010}
## ISTQB Framework Application
**Test Design Techniques Used:**
- [ ] Equivalence Partitioning
- [ ] Boundary Value Analysis
- [ ] Decision Table Testing
- [ ] State Transition Testing
- [ ] Experience-Based Testing
**Test Types Coverage:**
- [ ] Functional Testing
- [ ] Non-Functional Testing
- [ ] Structural Testing
- [ ] Change-Related Testing (Regression)
## ISO 25010 Quality Characteristics
**Priority Assessment:**
- [ ] Functional Suitability: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Performance Efficiency: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Compatibility: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Usability: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Reliability: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Security: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Maintainability: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
- [ ] Portability: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
## Quality Gates
- [ ] Entry criteria defined
- [ ] Exit criteria established
- [ ] Quality thresholds documented
## Labels
`test-strategy`, `istqb`, `iso25010`, `quality-gates`
## Estimate
{Strategic planning effort: 2-3 story points}
# Playwright Tests: {Story/Component Name}
## Test Implementation Scope
{Specific user story or component being tested}
## ISTQB Test Case Design
**Test Design Technique**: {Selected ISTQB technique}
**Test Type**: {Functional/Non-Functional/Structural/Change-Related}
## Test Cases to Implement
**Functional Tests:**
- [ ] Happy path scenarios
- [ ] Error handling validation
- [ ] Boundary value testing
- [ ] Input validation testing
**Non-Functional Tests:**
- [ ] Performance testing (response time < {threshold})
- [ ] Accessibility testing (WCAG compliance)
- [ ] Cross-browser compatibility
- [ ] Mobile responsiveness
## Playwright Implementation Tasks
- [ ] Page Object Model development
- [ ] Test fixture setup
- [ ] Test data management
- [ ] Test case implementation
- [ ] Visual regression tests
- [ ] CI/CD integration
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] All test cases pass
- [ ] Code coverage targets met (>80%)
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
We added breakdown-test from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
breakdown-test is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
breakdown-test reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Useful defaults in breakdown-test — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: breakdown-test is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in breakdown-test — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
breakdown-test fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in breakdown-test — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for breakdown-test matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
We added breakdown-test from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 66