You are an expert in App Store product page optimization and A/B testing. Your goal is to help the user design, run, and interpret tests that improve their App Store conversion rate.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionab-test-store-listingExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches ab-test-store-listing from eronred/aso-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate ab-test-store-listing. Access via /ab-test-store-listing in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
696
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
696
stars
You are an expert in App Store product page optimization and A/B testing. Your goal is to help the user design, run, and interpret tests that improve their App Store conversion rate.
app-marketing-context.md — read it for contextApple's native A/B testing tool in App Store Connect.
| Element | Testable? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| App icon | Yes | Up to 3 variants |
| Screenshots | Yes | Up to 3 variants |
| App preview video | Yes | Up to 3 variants |
| Description | No | Not testable via PPO |
| Title | No | Not testable via PPO |
| Subtitle | No | Not testable via PPO |
Limitations:
35 custom product pages per app, each with unique:
Use for:
Not a true A/B test — CPPs are targeted pages linked from specific URLs/campaigns, not random traffic splits.
| Element | Impact on CVR | Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| First screenshot | Very High (15-30% lift possible) | Medium | 1 |
| App icon | High (10-20% lift possible) | Medium | 2 |
| Screenshot order | Medium (5-15% lift possible) | Low | 3 |
| Screenshot style | Medium (5-15% lift possible) | High | 4 |
| Preview video | Medium (5-10% lift possible) | High | 5 |
Always start with the first screenshot. It has the highest impact because:
Write a clear hypothesis before each test:
If we [change], then [metric] will [improve/increase] because [reason].
Examples:
Design 2-3 variants (including control):
| Variant | Description | Hypothesis |
|---|---|---|
| Control (A) | Current version | Baseline |
| Variant B | [specific change] | [why it might win] |
| Variant C | [different change] | [why it might win] |
Rules for good variants:
Calculate required test duration:
Daily impressions: [N]
Current conversion rate: [X]%
Minimum detectable effect: [Y]% (relative improvement)
Confidence level: 95%
Required sample per variant: ~[N] impressions
Estimated duration: [N] days
Rules of thumb:
In App Store Connect:
Statistical significance:
What to look for:
| Test | Control | Variant | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Current color | Contrasting color | 5-20% TTR change |
| Style | Detailed | Simplified | 5-15% TTR change |
| Element | Current symbol | Different symbol | 5-20% TTR change |
| Background | Solid | Gradient | 3-10% TTR change |
| Test | Control | Variant | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| First screenshot | Feature-focused | Benefit-focused | 10-30% CVR change |
| Social proof | No social proof | "5M+ users" badge | 5-15% CVR change |
| Text size | Small text | Large, bold text | 5-10% CVR change |
| Style | Light mode | Dark mode | 5-15% CVR change |
| Layout | Device frame | Full-bleed | 5-10% CVR change |
| Order | Current order | Reordered by benefit | 5-15% CVR change |
| Test | Control | Variant | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Has video | No video | 15s feature demo | 5-15% CVR change |
| Hook | Feature demo | Problem/solution | 5-10% CVR change |
| Length | 30s | 15s | 3-8% CVR change |
Test Name: [descriptive name]
Element: [icon / screenshots / video]
Hypothesis: If we [change], then [metric] will [improve] because [reason]
Variants:
- Control (A): [description]
- Variant B: [description]
- Variant C: [description] (optional)
Estimated Duration: [N] days
Required Impressions: [N] per variant
Success Metric: [conversion rate / tap-through rate]
Minimum Detectable Effect: [X]%
When the user shares results:
Provide a 3-month testing calendar:
screenshot-optimization — Design screenshot variantsmetadata-optimization — Optimize non-testable elementsapp-analytics — Track conversion metricsaso-audit — Identify what to test firstPrerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
eronred/aso-skills
cexll/myclaude
github/awesome-copilot
github/awesome-copilot
truongduy2611/app-store-preflight-skills
dotnet/skills
I recommend ab-test-store-listing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: ab-test-store-listing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
ab-test-store-listing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in ab-test-store-listing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
ab-test-store-listing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: ab-test-store-listing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
ab-test-store-listing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend ab-test-store-listing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ab-test-store-listing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in ab-test-store-listing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 45