Expert in photo content analysis and intelligent curation. Combines classical computer vision with modern deep learning for comprehensive photo analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionphoto-content-recognition-curation-expertExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches photo-content-recognition-curation-expert from erichowens/some_claude_skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate photo-content-recognition-curation-expert. Access via /photo-content-recognition-curation-expert in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
84
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
84
stars
Expert in photo content analysis and intelligent curation. Combines classical computer vision with modern deep learning for comprehensive photo analysis.
✅ Use for:
❌ NOT for:
event-detection-temporal-intelligence-expertcolor-theory-palette-harmony-expertclip-aware-embeddingsWhat do you need to recognize/filter?
│
├─ Duplicate photos? ─────────────────────────────── Perceptual Hashing
│ ├─ Exact duplicates? ──────────────────────────── dHash (fastest)
│ ├─ Brightness/contrast changes? ───────────────── pHash (DCT-based)
│ ├─ Heavy crops/compression? ───────────────────── DINOHash (2025 SOTA)
│ └─ Production system? ─────────────────────────── Hybrid (pHash → DINOHash)
│
├─ People in photos? ─────────────────────────────── Face Clustering
│ ├─ Known thresholds? ──────────────────────────── Apple-style Agglomerative
│ └─ Unknown data distribution? ─────────────────── HDBSCAN
│
├─ Pets/Animals? ─────────────────────────────────── Pet Recognition
│ ├─ Detection? ─────────────────────────────────── YOLOv8
│ └─ Individual clustering? ─────────────────────── CLIP + HDBSCAN
│
├─ Best from burst? ──────────────────────────────── Burst Selection
│ └─ Score: sharpness + face quality + aesthetics
│
└─ Filter junk? ──────────────────────────────────── Content Detection
├─ Screenshots? ───────────────────────────────── Multi-signal classifier
└─ NSFW? ──────────────────────────────────────── Safety classifier
Problem: Camera bursts, re-saved images, and minor edits create near-duplicates.
Solution: Perceptual hashes generate similar values for visually similar images.
Method Comparison:
| Method | Speed | Robustness | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| dHash | Fastest | Low | Exact duplicates |
| pHash | Fast | Medium | Brightness/contrast changes |
| DINOHash | Slower | High | Heavy crops, compression |
| Hybrid | Medium | Very High | Production systems |
Hybrid Pipeline (2025 Best Practice):
Hamming Distance Thresholds:
→ Deep dive: references/perceptual-hashing.md
Goal: Group photos by person without user labeling.
Apple Photos Strategy (2021-2025):
HDBSCAN Alternative:
Parameters:
| Setting | Agglomerative | HDBSCAN |
|---|---|---|
| Pass 1 threshold | 0.4 (cosine) | - |
| Pass 2 threshold | 0.6 (cosine) | - |
| Min cluster size | - | 3 photos |
| Metric | cosine | cosine |
→ Deep dive: references/face-clustering.md
Problem: Burst mode creates 10-50 nearly identical photos.
Multi-Criteria Scoring:
| Criterion | Weight | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpness | 30% | Laplacian variance |
| Face Quality | 35% | Eyes open, smiling, face sharpness |
| Aesthetics | 20% | NIMA score |
| Position | 10% | Middle frames bonus |
| Exposure | 5% | Histogram clipping check |
Burst Detection: Photos within 0.5 seconds of each other.
→ Deep dive: references/content-detection.md
Multi-Signal Approach:
| Signal | Confidence | Description |
|---|---|---|
| UI elements | 0.85 | Status bars, buttons detected |
| Perfect rectangles | 0.75 | >5 UI buttons (90° angles) |
| High text | 0.70 | >25% text coverage (OCR) |
| No camera EXIF | 0.60 | Missing Make/Model/Lens |
| Device aspect | 0.60 | Exact phone screen ratio |
| Perfect sharpness | 0.50 | >2000 Laplacian variance |
Decision: Confidence >0.6 = screenshot
→ Deep dive: references/content-detection.md
Goal: Index 10K+ photos efficiently with caching.
Features Extracted:
Performance (10K photos, M1 MacBook Pro):
| Operation | Time |
|---|---|
| Perceptual hashing | 2 min |
| CLIP embeddings | 3 min (GPU) |
| Face detection | 4 min |
| Color palettes | 1 min |
| Aesthetic scoring | 2 min (GPU) |
| Clustering + dedup | 1 min |
| Total (first run) | ~13 min |
| Incremental | <1 min |
→ Deep dive: references/photo-indexing.md
What it looks like:
distance = np.linalg.norm(embedding1 - embedding2) # WRONG
Why it's wrong: Face embeddings are normalized; cosine similarity is the correct metric.
What to do instead:
from scipy.spatial.distance import cosine
distance = cosine(embedding1, embedding2) # Correct
What it looks like: Using same distance threshold for all face clusters.
Why it's wrong: Different people have varying intra-class variance (twins vs. diverse ages).
What to do instead: Use HDBSCAN for automatic threshold discovery, or two-pass clustering with conservative + relaxed passes.
What it looks like:
is_duplicate = np.allclose(img1, img2) # WRONG
Why it's wrong: Re-saved JPEGs, crops, brightness changes create pixel differences.
What to do instead: Perceptual hashing (pHash or DINOHash) with Hamming distance.
What it looks like: Processing faces one photo at a time without batching.
Why it's wrong: GPU underutilization, 10x slower than batched.
What to do instead: Batch process images (batch_size=32) with GPU acceleration.
What it looks like:
for face in all_detected_faces:
cluster(face) # No filtering
Why it's wrong: Low-confidence detections create noise clusters (hands, objects).
What to do instead: Filter by confidence (threshold 0.9 for faces).
What it looks like: Assigning noise points to nearest cluster.
Why it's wrong: Solo appearances shouldn't pollute person clusters.
What to do instead: HDBSCAN/DBSCAN naturally identifies noise (label=-1). Keep noise separate.
from photo_curation import PhotoCurationPipeline
pipeline = PhotoCurationPipeline()
# Index photo library
index = pipeline.index_library('/path/to/photos')
# De-duplicate
duplicates = index.find_duplicates()
print(f"Found {len(duplicates)} duplicate groups")
# Cluster faces
face_clusters = index.cluster_faces()
print(f"Found {len(face_clusters)} people")
# Select best from bursts
best_photos = pipeline.select_best_from_bursts(index)
# Filter screenshots
real_photos = pipeline.filter_screenshots(index)
# Curate for collage
collage_photos = pipeline.curate_for_collage(index, target_count=100)
torch transformers facenet-pytorch ultralytics hdbscan opencv-python scipy numpy scikit-learn pillow pytesseract
Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: November 2025
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
erichowens/some_claude_skills
erichowens/some_claude_skills
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
wispbit-ai/skills
hvpandya/stop-slop
jeffallan/claude-skills
photo-content-recognition-curation-expert is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: photo-content-recognition-curation-expert is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
photo-content-recognition-curation-expert has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in photo-content-recognition-curation-expert — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: photo-content-recognition-curation-expert is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
photo-content-recognition-curation-expert has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: photo-content-recognition-curation-expert is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend photo-content-recognition-curation-expert for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend photo-content-recognition-curation-expert for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: photo-content-recognition-curation-expert is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 47