You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy with access to pricing research data and analysis tools. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionpricing-strategyExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches pricing-strategy from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate pricing-strategy. Access via /pricing-strategy in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
24.2K
stars
You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy with access to pricing research data and analysis tools. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Every pricing decision involves three dimensions:
1. Packaging — What's included at each tier?
2. Pricing Metric — What do you charge for?
3. Price Point — How much do you charge?
Price should be based on value delivered, not cost to serve:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ Customer's perceived value of your solution │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $1000 │
│ │
│ ↑ Value captured (your opportunity) │
│ │
│ Your price │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $500 │
│ │
│ ↑ Consumer surplus (value customer keeps) │
│ │
│ Next best alternative │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $300 │
│ │
│ ↑ Differentiation value │
│ │
│ Your cost to serve │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $50 │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key insight: Price between the next best alternative and perceived value. Cost is a floor, not a basis.
The Van Westendorp survey identifies the acceptable price range for your product.
The Four Questions:
Ask each respondent:
How to Analyze:
The acceptable price range: PMC to PME Optimal pricing zone: Between OPP and IDP
Survey Tips:
Sample Van Westendorp Analysis Output:
Price Sensitivity Analysis Results:
─────────────────────────────────
Point of Marginal Cheapness: $29/mo
Optimal Price Point: $49/mo
Indifference Price Point: $59/mo
Point of Marginal Expensiveness: $79/mo
Recommended range: $49-59/mo
Current price: $39/mo (below optimal)
Opportunity: 25-50% price increase without significant demand impact
MaxDiff identifies which features customers value most, informing packaging decisions.
How It Works:
Example Survey Question:
Which feature is MOST important to you?
Which feature is LEAST important to you?
□ Unlimited projects
□ Custom branding
□ Priority support
□ API access
□ Advanced analytics
Analyzing Results:
Features are ranked by utility score:
Using MaxDiff for Packaging:
| Utility Score | Packaging Decision |
|---|---|
| Top 20% | Include in all tiers (table stakes) |
| 20-50% | Use to differentiate tiers |
| 50-80% | Higher tiers only |
| Bottom 20% | Consider cutting or premium add-on |
Direct method (simple but biased): "How much would you pay for [product]?"
Better: Gabor-Granger method: "Would you buy [product] at [$X]?" (Yes/No) Vary price across respondents to build demand curve.
Even better: Conjoint analysis: Show product bundles at different prices Respondents choose preferred option Statistical analysis reveals price sensitivity per feature
The value metric is what you charge for—it should scale with the value customers receive.
Good value metrics:
| Metric | Best For | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Per user/seat | Collaboration tools | Slack, Notion |
| Per usage | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Per feature | Modular products | HubSpot add-ons |
| Per contact/record | CRM, email tools | Mailchimp, HubSpot |
| Per transaction | Payments, marketplaces | Stripe, Shopify |
| Flat fee | Simple products | Basecamp |
| Revenue share | High-value outcomes | Affiliate platforms |
Step 1: Identify how customers get value
Step 2: Map usage to value
| Usage Pattern | Value Delivered | Potential Metric |
|---|---|---|
| More team members use it | More collaboration value | Per user |
| More data processed | More insights | Per record/event |
| More revenue generated | Direct ROI | Revenue share |
| More projects managed | More organization | Per project |
Step 3: Test for alignment
Ask: "As a customer uses more of [metric], do they get more value?"
1. Instrument usage data Track how customers use your product:
2. Correlate with customer success
3. Identify value thresholds
Example Analysis:
Usage-Value Correlation Analysis:
─────────────────────────────────
Segment: High-LTV customers (>$10k ARR)
Average monthly active users: 15
Average projects: 8
Average integrations: 4
Segment: Churned customers
Average monthly active users: 3
Average projects: 2
Average integrations: 0
Insight: Value correlates with team adoption (users)
and depth of use (integrations)
Recommendation: Price per user, gate integrations to higher tiers
2 tiers: Simple, clear choice
3 tiers: Industry standard
4+ tiers: More granularity
Good tier (Entry):
Better tier (Recommended):
Best tier (Premium):
Feature gating:
Usage limits:
Support level:
Access and customization:
┌────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│ │ Starter │ Pro │ Business │
│ │ $29/mo │ $79/mo │ $199/mo │
├────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ Users │ Up to 5 │ Up to 20 │ Unlimited │
│ Projects │ 10 │ Unlimited │ Unlimited │
│ Storage │ 5 GB │ 50 GB │ 500 GB │
│ Integrations │ 3 │ 10 │ Unlimited │
│ Analytics │ Basic │ Advanced │ Custom │
│ Support │ Email │ Priority │ Dedicated │
│ API Access │ ✗ │ ✓ │ ✓ │
│ SSO │ ✗ │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ Audit logs │ ✗ │ ✗ │ ✓ │
└────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘
Different customers have different:
Segment by:
Step 1: Define personas
| Persona | Size | Needs | WTP | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freelancer | 1 person | Basic features | Low | $19/mo |
| Small Team | 2-10 | Collaboration | Medium | $49/mo |
| Growing Co | 10-50 | Scale, integrations | Higher | $149/mo |
| Enterprise | 50+ | Security, support | High | Custom |
Step 2: Map features to personas
| Feature | Freelancer | Small Team | Growing | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Collaboration | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | — | Limited | Full | Full |
| API access | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO/SAML | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Audit logs | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom contract | — | — | — | ✓ |
Step 3: Price to value for each persona
Freemium works when:
Freemium risks:
Example: Slack
Free trial works when:
Trial best practices:
Credit card upfront:
Freemium + Trial:
Reverse trial:
Market signals:
Business signals:
Product signals:
1. Grandfather existing customers
2. Delayed increase for existing
3. Increase tied to value
4. Plan restructure
For new customers:
For existing customers:
Subject: Updates to [Product] pricing
Hi [Name],
I'm writing to let you know about upcoming changes to [Product] pricing.
[Context: what you've added, why change is happening]
Starting [date], our pricing will change from [old] to [new].
As a valued customer, [what this means for them: grandfathered, locked rate, timeline].
[If they're affected:]
You have until [date] to [action: lock in current rate, renew at old price].
[If they're grandfathered:]
You'll continue at your current rate. No action needed.
We appreciate your continued support of [Product].
[Your name]
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
davila7/claude-code-templates
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
Registry listing for pricing-strategy matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pricing-strategy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added pricing-strategy from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in pricing-strategy — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
pricing-strategy is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: pricing-strategy is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
pricing-strategy fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend pricing-strategy for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for pricing-strategy matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
pricing-strategy fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 33