Provide a comprehensive checklist for planning, executing, and following up on penetration tests. Ensure thorough preparation, proper scoping, and effective remediation of discovered vulnerabilities.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionpentest-checklistExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches pentest-checklist from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate pentest-checklist. Access via /pentest-checklist in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
24.2K
stars
Provide a comprehensive checklist for planning, executing, and following up on penetration tests. Ensure thorough preparation, proper scoping, and effective remediation of discovered vulnerabilities.
Reference Questions:
| Type | Purpose | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| External Pentest | Assess external attack surface | Public-facing systems |
| Internal Pentest | Assess insider threat risk | Internal network |
| Web Application | Find application vulnerabilities | Specific applications |
| Social Engineering | Test human security | Employees, processes |
| Red Team | Full adversary simulation | Entire organization |
| Factor | Consideration |
|---|---|
| Asset Value | Higher value = higher investment |
| Complexity | More systems = more time |
| Depth Required | Thorough testing costs more |
| Reputation Value | Brand-name firms cost more |
Budget Reality Check:
Environment Options:
Production - Realistic but risky
Staging - Safer but may differ from production
Clone - Ideal but resource-intensive
Common Pre-Scan Tools:
# Network vulnerability scan
nmap -sV --script vuln TARGET
# Web vulnerability scan
nikto -h http://TARGET
Cloud Provider Policies:
Evaluation Criteria:
| Factor | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Experience | Years in field, similar projects |
| Methodology | OWASP, PTES, custom approach |
| Reporting | Sample reports, detail level |
| Communication | Availability, update frequency |
Testing Approaches:
| Type | Access Level | Simulates |
|---|---|---|
| Black Box | No information | External attacker |
| Gray Box | Partial access | Insider with limited access |
| White Box | Full access | Insider/detailed audit |
Report Should Include:
Monitoring Tools:
# Check security logs
tail -f /var/log/auth.log
tail -f /var/log/apache2/access.log
# Monitor network
tcpdump -i eth0 -w capture.pcap
Key Logs to Monitor:
Testing Frequency Factors:
□ Scope defined and documented
□ Authorization obtained
□ Environment prepared
□ Hosting provider notified
□ Team briefed
□ Monitoring enabled
□ Backups verified
□ Report received and reviewed
□ Findings prioritized
□ Remediation assigned
□ Fixes implemented
□ Verification testing scheduled
□ Environment cleaned up
□ Next test scheduled
**Target:** Corporate web application (app.company.com)
**Type:** Gray box web application pentest
**Duration:** 5 business days
**Excluded:** DoS testing, production database access
**Access:** Standard user account provided
# Enable comprehensive logging
sudo systemctl restart rsyslog
sudo systemctl restart auditd
# Start packet capture
tcpdump -i eth0 -w /tmp/pentest_capture.pcap &
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Scope creep | Document and require change approval |
| Testing impacts production | Schedule off-hours, use staging |
| Findings disputed | Provide detailed evidence, retest |
| Remediation delayed | Prioritize by risk, set deadlines |
| Budget exceeded | Define clear scope, fixed-price contracts |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
davila7/claude-code-templates
davila7/claude-code-templates
davila7/claude-code-templates
davila7/claude-code-templates
davila7/claude-code-templates
davila7/claude-code-templates
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pentest-checklist is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend pentest-checklist for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
pentest-checklist has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in pentest-checklist — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
pentest-checklist is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Registry listing for pentest-checklist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
pentest-checklist has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for pentest-checklist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
pentest-checklist fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pentest-checklist is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 56