Development platform for debugging, evaluating, and monitoring language models and AI applications.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionlangsmith-observabilityExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches langsmith-observability from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate langsmith-observability. Access via /langsmith-observability in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
24.2K
stars
Development platform for debugging, evaluating, and monitoring language models and AI applications.
Use LangSmith when:
Key features:
Use alternatives instead:
pip install langsmith
# Set environment variables
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your-api-key"
export LANGSMITH_TRACING=true
from langsmith import traceable
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
@traceable
def generate_response(prompt: str) -> str:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# Automatically traced to LangSmith
result = generate_response("What is machine learning?")
from langsmith.wrappers import wrap_openai
from openai import OpenAI
# Wrap client for automatic tracing
client = wrap_openai(OpenAI())
# All calls automatically traced
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
A run is a single execution unit (LLM call, chain, tool). Runs form hierarchical traces showing the full execution flow.
from langsmith import traceable
@traceable(run_type="chain")
def process_query(query: str) -> str:
# Parent run
context = retrieve_context(query) # Child run
response = generate_answer(query, context) # Child run
return response
@traceable(run_type="retriever")
def retrieve_context(query: str) -> list:
return vector_store.search(query)
@traceable(run_type="llm")
def generate_answer(query: str, context: list) -> str:
return llm.invoke(f"Context: {context}\n\nQuestion: {query}")
Projects organize related runs. Set via environment or code:
import os
os.environ["LANGSMITH_PROJECT"] = "my-project"
# Or per-function
@traceable(project_name="my-project")
def my_function():
pass
from langsmith import Client
client = Client()
# List runs
runs = list(client.list_runs(
project_name="my-project",
filter='eq(status, "success")',
limit=100
))
# Get run details
run = client.read_run(run_id="...")
# Create feedback
client.create_feedback(
run_id="...",
key="correctness",
score=0.9,
comment="Good answer"
)
from langsmith import Client
client = Client()
# Create dataset
dataset = client.create_dataset("qa-test-set", description="QA evaluation")
# Add examples
client.create_examples(
inputs=[
{"question": "What is Python?"},
{"question": "What is ML?"}
],
outputs=[
{"answer": "A programming language"},
{"answer": "Machine learning"}
],
dataset_id=dataset.id
)
from langsmith import evaluate
def my_model(inputs: dict) -> dict:
# Your model logic
return {"answer": generate_answer(inputs["question"])}
def correctness_evaluator(run, example):
prediction = run.outputs["answer"]
reference = example.outputs["answer"]
score = 1.0 if reference.lower() in prediction.lower() else 0.0
return {"key": "correctness", "score": score}
results = evaluate(
my_model,
data="qa-test-set",
evaluators=[correctness_evaluator],
experiment_prefix="v1"
)
print(f"Average score: {results.aggregate_metrics['correctness']}")
from langsmith.evaluation import LangChainStringEvaluator
# Use LangChain evaluators
results = evaluate(
my_model,
data="qa-test-set",
evaluators=[
LangChainStringEvaluator("qa")✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
ml-paper-writing
75davila7/claude-code-templates
AI/MLsame repogrill-me
648mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★40 reviews- CCharlotte Gupta★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: langsmith-observability is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
We added langsmith-observability from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- DDaniel Bansal★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAmina Okafor★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
langsmith-observability has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- SSakshi Patil★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- KKofi Ramirez★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
langsmith-observability is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 7, 2024
langsmith-observability reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Oct 26, 2024
langsmith-observability is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- LLi Choi★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
langsmith-observability has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 40
1 / 4Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.