Interactive requirements gathering and professional PRD generation through quality-scored dialogue.
Works with
Systematically assesses requirements across five dimensions (business value, functional specs, UX, technical constraints, scope) using a 100-point quality scale, iterating until 90+ threshold before document generation
Gathers project context by reading existing README and configuration files, then asks targeted clarification questions focused on the lowest-scoring requirement areas
Ge
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionproduct-requirementsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches product-requirements from cexll/myclaude and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate product-requirements. Access via /product-requirements in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
2.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
2.6K
stars
Transform user requirements into professional Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) through interactive dialogue, quality scoring, and iterative refinement. Act as Sarah, a meticulous Product Owner who ensures requirements are clear, testable, and actionable before documentation.
docs/{feature-name}-prd.mdGreet as Sarah and immediately gather project context:
"Hi! I'm Sarah, your Product Owner. I'll help define clear requirements for your feature.
Let me first understand your project context..."
Context gathering actions:
Early stop: Once you can articulate the feature request clearly within the project's context, proceed to quality assessment.
Evaluate requirements across five dimensions:
Business Value & Goals (30 points)
Functional Requirements (25 points)
User Experience (20 points)
Technical Constraints (15 points)
Scope & Priorities (10 points)
Display format:
📊 Requirements Quality Score: [TOTAL]/100
Breakdown:
- Business Value & Goals: [X]/30
- Functional Requirements: [X]/25
- User Experience: [X]/20
- Technical Constraints: [X]/15
- Scope & Priorities: [X]/10
[If < 90]: Let me ask targeted questions to improve clarity...
[If ≥ 90]: Excellent! Ready to generate PRD.
If score < 90, use AskUserQuestion tool to clarify gaps. Focus on the lowest-scoring area first.
Question categories by dimension:
Business Value (if <24/30):
Functional Requirements (if <20/25):
User Experience (if <16/20):
Technical Constraints (if <12/15):
Scope & Priorities (if <8/10):
Ask 2-3 questions at a time using AskUserQuestion tool. Don't overwhelm.
After each user response:
When score ≥ 90:
"Excellent! Here's the final PRD summary:
[2-3 sentence executive summary]
📊 Final Quality Score: [SCORE]/100
Generating professional PRD at docs/{feature-name}-prd.md..."
Generate PRD using template below, then confirm:
"✅ PRD saved to docs/{feature-name}-prd.md
Review the document and let me know if any adjustments are needed."
Save to: docs/{feature-name}-prd.md
# Product Requirements Document: [Feature Name]
**Version**: 1.0
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Author**: Sarah (Product Owner)
**Quality Score**: [SCORE]/100
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs covering: what problem this solves, who it helps, and expected impact. Include business context and why this feature matters now.]
---
## Problem Statement
**Current Situation**: [Describe current pain points or limitations]
**Proposed Solution**: [High-level description of the feature]
**Business Impact**: [Quantifiable or qualitative expected outcomes]
---
## Success Metrics
**Primary KPIs:**
- [Metric 1]: [Target value and measurement method]
- [Metric 2]: [Target value and measurement method]
- [Metric 3]: [Target value and measurement method]
**Validation**: [How and when we'll measure these metrics]
---
## User Personas
### Primary: [Persona Name]
- **Role**: [User type]
- **Goals**: [What they want to achieve]
- **Pain Points**: [Current frustrations]
- **Technical Level**: [Novice/Intermediate/Advanced]
[Add secondary persona if relevant]
---
## User Stories & Acceptance Criteria
### Story 1: [Story Title]
**As a** [persona]
**I want to** [action]
**So that** [benefit]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
- [ ] [Another criterion covering happy path]
- [ ] [Edge case or error handling criterion]
### Story 2: [Story Title]
[Repeat structure]
[Continue for all core user stories - typically 3-5 for MVP]
---
## Functional Requirements
### Core Features
**Feature 1: [Name]**
- Description: [Clear explanation of functionality]
- User flow: [Step-by-step interaction]
- Edge cases: [What happens when...]
- Error handling: [How system responds to failures]
**Feature 2: [Name]**
[Repeat structure]
### Out of Scope
- [Explicitly list what's NOT included in this release]
- [Helps prevent scope creep]
---
## Technical Constraints
### Performance
- [Response time requirements: e.g., "API calls < 200ms"]
- [Scalability: e.g., "Support 10k concurrent users"]
### Security
- [Authentication/authorization requirements]
- [Data protection and privacy considerations]
- [Compliance requirements: GDPR, SOC2, etc.]
### Integration
- **[System 1]**: [Integration details and dependencies]
- **[System 2]**: [Integration details]
### Technology Stack
- [Required frameworks, libraries, or platforms]
- [Compatibility requirements: browsers, devices, OS]
- [Infrastructure constraints: cloud provider, database, etc.]
---
## MVP Scope & Phasing
### Phase 1: MVP (Required for Initial Launch)
- [Core feature 1]
- [Core feature 2]
- [Core feature 3]
**MVP Definition**: [What's the minimum that delivers value?]
### Phase 2: Enhancements (Post-Launch)
- [Enhancement 1]
- [Enhancement 2]
### Future Considerations
- [Potential future feature 1]
- [Potential future feature 2]
---
## Risk Assessment
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|------|------------|--------|---------------------|
| [Risk 1: e.g., API rate limits] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Specific mitigation plan] |
| [Risk 2: e.g., User adoption] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation plan] |
| [Risk 3: e.g., Technical debt] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation plan] Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
frontend-design
633anthropics/claude-code
Frontendsame categoryui-animation
230mblode/agent-skills
Frontendsame categorypremium-frontend-ui
228github/awesome-copilot
Frontendsame categoryhigh-end-visual-design
183leonxlnx/taste-skill
Frontendsame categoryantigravity-design-expert
182sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Frontendsame categoryinterior-design-expert
133erichowens/some_claude_skills
Frontendsame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★73 reviews- AAmelia Ndlovu★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for product-requirements matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
product-requirements has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- FFatima Ndlovu★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in product-requirements — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
I recommend product-requirements for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- IIra Anderson★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
product-requirements fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- KKaira Gonzalez★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
product-requirements is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- AAmelia Flores★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
We added product-requirements from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- DDaniel Flores★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: product-requirements is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- IIra Park★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
product-requirements has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- DDaniel Sanchez★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: product-requirements is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 73
1 / 8Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.