Fast, Rust-based linter and formatter replacing ESLint and Prettier with 100x speed improvement.
Works with
Single tool combining linting, formatting, and import sorting with zero-config defaults and TypeScript-first design
Supports three core commands: check (lint + format together), format (formatting only), and lint (linting only), all with --write for automatic fixes
Includes VS Code extension with format-on-save, organized rule categories (correctness, style, suspicious, performance, secur
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionbiomeExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches biome from bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate biome. Access via /biome in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
29
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
29
stars
Biome is a fast, all-in-one toolchain for web projects written in Rust. It replaces both ESLint and Prettier with a single tool that's 100x faster and provides zero-config defaults.
Key Features:
Installation:
npm install --save-dev @biomejs/biome
# Create biome.json configuration
npx @biomejs/biome init
# Check your project
npx @biomejs/biome check .
# Fix issues automatically
npx @biomejs/biome check --write .
# Format only
npx @biomejs/biome format --write .
# Lint only
npx @biomejs/biome lint .
{
"scripts": {
"check": "biome check .",
"check:write": "biome check --write .",
"format": "biome format --write .",
"lint": "biome lint .",
"lint:fix": "biome lint --write ."
}
}
{
"$schema": "https://biomejs.dev/schemas/1.9.4/schema.json",
"vcs": {
"enabled": true,
"clientKind": "git",
"useIgnoreFile": true
},
"files": {
"ignoreUnknown": false,
"ignore": ["node_modules", "dist", "build", ".next"]
},
"formatter": {
"enabled": true,
"indentStyle": "space",
"indentWidth": 2,
"lineWidth": 100
},
"linter": {
"enabled": true,
"rules": {
"recommended": true
}
},
"javascript": {
"formatter": {
"quoteStyle": "single",
"semicolons": "asNeeded",
"trailingCommas": "all"
}
}
}
The check command runs both linting and formatting:
# Check all files
biome check .
# Fix issues automatically
biome check --write .
# Unsafe fixes (may change behavior)
biome check --write --unsafe .
# Apply suggested fixes
biome check --write --unsafe --apply-suggested
# Check specific files
biome check src/**/*.ts
# CI mode (exit with error on issues)
biome ci .
Format code without linting:
# Format all files
biome format --write .
# Check formatting without changing files
biome format .
# Format specific files
biome format --write src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}
# Format stdin
echo "const x={a:1}" | biome format --stdin-file-path=file.js
Lint code without formatting:
# Lint all files
biome lint .
# Fix linting issues
biome lint --write .
# Show rule names
biome lint --verbose .
# Apply unsafe fixes
biome lint --write --unsafe .
{
"formatter": {
"enabled": true,
"formatWithErrors": false,
"indentStyle": "space",
"indentWidth": 2,
"lineEnding": "lf",
"lineWidth": 80,
"attributePosition": "auto"
},
"javascript": {
"formatter": {
"quoteStyle": "single",
"jsxQuoteStyle": "double",
"quoteProperties": "asNeeded",
"trailingCommas": "all",
"semicolons": "asNeeded",
"arrowParentheses": "always",
"bracketSpacing": true,
"bracketSameLine": false
}
},
"json": {
"formatter": {
"trailingCommas": "none"
}
}
}
{
"linter": {
"enabled": true,
"rules": {
"recommended": true,
"a11y": {
"recommended": true,
"noAutofocus": "error",
"useKeyWithClickEvents": "warn"
},
"complexity": {
"recommended": true,
"noForEach": "off",
"useLiteralKeys": "error"
},
"correctness": {
"recommended": true,
"noUnusedVariables": "error",
"useExhaustiveDependencies": "warn"
},
"performance": {
"recommended": true,
"noAccumulatingSpread": "warn"
},
"security": {
"recommended": true,
"noDangerouslySetInnerHtml": "error"
},
"style": {
"recommended": true,
"noNonNullAssertion": "warn",
"useConst": "error",
"useTemplate": "warn"
},
"suspicious": {
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
708mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
165cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
141pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
141ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★38 reviews- SSakura Reddy★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
biome is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- DDev Perez★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
biome reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- MMateo Park★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
I recommend biome for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- LLucas Lopez★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: biome is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- KKabir Malhotra★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
biome fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- SSakura Ghosh★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
We added biome from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- VValentina Ndlovu★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
Useful defaults in biome — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- MMia Gill★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
biome has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- IIshan Gonzalez★★★★★Sep 25, 2024
biome fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
Registry listing for biome matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 38
1 / 4Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.