Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionautoresearchclaw-autonomous-researchExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research from aradotso/trending-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research. Access via /autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
22
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
22
stars
Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
AutoResearchClaw is a fully autonomous 23-stage research pipeline that takes a natural language topic and produces a complete academic paper: real arXiv/Semantic Scholar citations, sandboxed experiments, statistical analysis, multi-agent peer review, and conference-ready LaTeX (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR). No hallucinated references. No human babysitting.
# Clone and install
git clone https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.git
cd AutoResearchClaw
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e .
# Verify CLI is available
researchclaw --help
Requirements: Python 3.11+
cp config.researchclaw.example.yaml config.arc.yaml
config.arc.yaml)project:
name: "my-research"
research:
topic: "Your research topic here"
llm:
provider: "openai"
base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
api_key_env: "OPENAI_API_KEY"
primary_model: "gpt-4o"
fallback_models: ["gpt-4o-mini"]
experiment:
mode: "sandbox"
sandbox:
python_path: ".venv/bin/python"
export OPENAI_API_KEY="$YOUR_OPENAI_KEY"
llm:
provider: "openrouter"
api_key_env: "OPENROUTER_API_KEY"
primary_model: "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet"
fallback_models:
- "google/gemini-pro-1.5"
- "meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct"
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="$YOUR_OPENROUTER_KEY"
llm:
provider: "acp"
acp:
agent: "claude" # or: codex, gemini, opencode, kimi
cwd: "."
The agent CLI (e.g. claude) handles its own authentication.
openclaw_bridge:
use_cron: true # Scheduled research runs
use_message: true # Progress notifications
use_memory: true # Cross-session knowledge persistence
use_sessions_spawn: true # Parallel sub-sessions
use_web_fetch: true # Live web search in literature review
use_browser: false # Browser-based paper collection
# Basic run — fully autonomous, no prompts
researchclaw run --topic "Your research idea" --auto-approve
# Run with explicit config file
researchclaw run --config config.arc.yaml --topic "Mixture-of-experts routing efficiency" --auto-approve
# Run with topic defined in config (omit --topic flag)
researchclaw run --config config.arc.yaml --auto-approve
# Interactive mode — pauses at gate stages for approval
researchclaw run --config config.arc.yaml --topic "Your topic"
# Check pipeline status / resume a run
researchclaw status --run-id rc-20260315-120000-abc123
# List past runs
researchclaw list
Gate stages (5, 9, 20) pause for human approval in interactive mode. Pass --auto-approve to skip all gates.
from researchclaw.pipeline import Runner
from researchclaw.config import load_config
# Load config and run
config = load_config("config.arc.yaml")
config.research.topic = "Efficient attention mechanisms for long-context LLMs"
config.auto_approve = True
runner = Runner(config)
result = runner.run()
# Access outputs
print(result.artifact_dir) # artifacts/rc-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-<hash>/
print(result.deliverables_dir) # .../deliverables/
print(result.paper_draft_path) # .../deliverables/paper_draft.md
print(result.latex_path) # .../deliverables/paper.tex
print(result.bibtex_path) # .../deliverables/references.bib
print(result.verification_report) # .../deliverables/verification_report.json
# Run specific stages only
from researchclaw.pipeline import Runner, StageRange
runner = Runner(config)
result = runner.run(stages=StageRange(start="LITERATURE_COLLECT", end="KNOWLEDGE_EXTRACT"))
# Access knowledge base after a run
from researchclaw.knowledge import KnowledgeBase
kb = KnowledgeBase.load(result.artifact_dir)
findings = kb.get("findings")
literature = kb.get("literature")
decisions = kb.get("decisions")
After a run, all outputs land in artifacts/rc-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-<hash>/:
artifacts/rc-20260315-120000-abc123/
├── deliverables/
│ ├── paper_draft.md # Full academic paper (Markdown)
│ ├── paper.tex # Conference-ready LaTeX
│ ├── references.bib # Real BibTeX — auto-pruned to inline citations
│ ├── verification_report.json # 4-layer citation integrity report
│ └── reviews.md # Multi-agent peer review
├── experiment_runs/
│ ├── run_001/
│ │ ├── code/ # Generated experiment code
│ │ ├── results.json # Structured metrics
│ │ └── sandbox_output.txt # Execution logs
├── charts/
│ └── *.png # Auto-generated comparison charts
├── evolution/
│ └── lessons.json # Self-learning lessons for future runs
└── knowledge_base/
├── decisions.json
├── experiments.json
├── findings.json
├── literature.json
├── questions.json
└── reviews.json
| Phase | Stage # | Name | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | TOPIC_INIT | Parse and scope research topic |
| A | 2 | PROBLEM_DECOMPOSE | Break into sub-problems |
| B | 3 | SEARCH_STRATEGY | Build search queries |
| B | 4 | LITERATURE_COLLECT | Real API calls to arXiv + Semantic Scholar |
| B | 5 | LITERATURE_SCREEN | Gate — approve/reject literature |
| B | 6 | KNOWLEDGE_EXTRACT | Extract structured knowledge |
| C | 7 | SYNTHESIS | Synthesize findings |
| C | 8 | HYPOTHESIS_GEN | Multi-agent debate to form hypotheses |
| D | 9 | EXPERIMENT_DESIGN | Gate — approve/reject design |
| D | 10 | CODE_GENERATION | Generate experiment code |
| D | 11 | RESOURCE_PLANNING | GPU/MPS/CPU auto-detection |
| E | 12 | EXPERIMENT_RUN | Sandboxed execution |
| E | 13 | ITERATIVE_REFINE | Self-healing on failure |
| F | 14 | RESULT_ANALYSIS | Multi-agent analysis |
| F | 15 | RESEARCH_DECISION | PROCEED / REFINE / PIVOT |
| G | 16 | PAPER_OUTLINE | Structure paper |
| G | 17 | PAPER_DRAFT | Write full paper |
| G | 18 | PEER_REVIEW | Evidence-consistency check |
| G | 19 | PAPER_REVISION | Incorporate review feedback |
| H | 20 | QUALITY_GATE | Gate — final approval |
| H | 21 | KNOWLEDGE_ARCHIVE | Save lessons to KB |
| H | 22 | EXPORT_PUBLISH | Emit LaTeX + BibTeX |
| H | 23 | CITATION_VERIFY | 4-layer anti-hallucination check |
export OPENAI_API_KEY="$OPENAI_API_KEY"
researchclaw run \
--topic "Self-supervised learning for protein structure prediction" \
--auto-approve
# config.arc.yaml
project:
name: "protein-ssl-research"
research:
topic: "Self-supervised learning for protein structure prediction"
llm:
provider: "openai"
api_key_env: "OPENAI_API_KEY"
primary_model: "gpt-4o"
fallback_models: ["gpt-4o-mini"]
experiment:
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
704mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
164cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
141ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
140pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.5★★★★★62 reviews- PPratham Ware★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAnaya Perez★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- AAva Johnson★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- CCarlos Sharma★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- WWilliam Khan★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
I recommend autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AAnika Smith★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AAisha Diallo★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- CCarlos Kapoor★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AAva Smith★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- AAnika Jain★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for autoresearchclaw-autonomous-research matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 62
1 / 7Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.