seo-audit▌
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
/seo-audit
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.
Trigger
User runs /seo-audit or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.
Inputs
Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:
-
URL or domain — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
-
Audit type — one of:
- Full site audit — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
- Keyword research — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
- Content gap analysis — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
- Technical SEO check — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
- Competitor SEO comparison — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors
If not specified, default to full site audit.
-
Target keywords or topics (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
-
Competitors (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.
Process
1. Keyword Research
Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.
If ~~SEO tools are connected:
- Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
- Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground
If ~~product analytics are connected:
- Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions
If tools are not connected:
- Use web search to research the keyword landscape
- Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."
For each keyword opportunity, assess:
- Primary keywords — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
- Secondary keywords — supporting terms and variations
- Search volume signals — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
- Keyword difficulty — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
- Long-tail opportunities — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
- Question-based keywords — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
- Intent classification — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional
2. On-Page SEO Audit
For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:
- Title tags — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
- Meta descriptions — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
- H1 tags — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
- H2/H3 structure — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
- Keyword usage — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
- Internal linking — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
- Image alt text — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
- URL structure — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth
3. Content Gap Analysis
Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:
- Competitor topic coverage — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
- Content freshness — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
- Thin content — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
- Missing content types — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
- Funnel gaps — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
- Topic clusters — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content
4. Technical SEO Checklist
Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:
- Page speed — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
- Mobile-friendliness — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
- Structured data — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
- Crawlability — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
- Broken links — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
- HTTPS — secure connection, mixed content issues
- Core Web Vitals signals — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
- Indexation — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks
5. Competitor SEO Comparison
For each competitor, compare:
- Keyword overlap — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
- Keyword gaps — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
- Domain authority signals — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
- Content depth — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
- Backlink profile observations — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
- SERP feature ownership — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
- Technical advantages — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage
Output
Executive Summary
Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:
- The site's biggest strength
- The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
- An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues
Keyword Opportunity Table
| Keyword | Est. Difficulty | Opportunity Score | Current Ranking | Intent | Recommended Content Type |
|---|
Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.
Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.
On-Page Issues Table
| Page | Issue | Severity | Recommended Fix |
|---|
Severity levels:
- Critical — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
- High — significant impact on SEO performance
- Medium — best practice violation, moderate impact
- Low — minor optimization opportunity
Content Gap Recommendations
For each content gap identified, provide:
- Topic or keyword to target
- Why it matters — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
- Recommended format — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
- Priority — high, medium, or low
- Estimated effort — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)
Technical SEO Checklist
| Check | Status | Details |
|---|
Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.
Competitor Comparison Summary
| Dimension | Your Site | Competitor A | Competitor B | Winner |
|---|
Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.
Prioritized Action Plan
Split recommendations into two categories:
Quick Wins (do this week):
- Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
- Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text
Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):
- Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
- Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure
For each action item, include:
- What to do (specific and concrete)
- Expected impact (high, medium, low)
- Effort estimate
- Dependencies (if any)
Follow-Up
After presenting the audit, ask:
"Would you like me to:
- Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
- Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
- Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
- Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
- Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"
How to use seo-audit on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add seo-audit
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches seo-audit from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate seo-audit. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /seo-audit) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★68 reviews- ★★★★★Amelia Wang· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: seo-audit is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Arjun Reddy· Dec 20, 2024
seo-audit reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024
seo-audit is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sofia Rahman· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend seo-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Xiao Verma· Dec 16, 2024
seo-audit has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for seo-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Arjun White· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in seo-audit — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Xiao Wang· Dec 4, 2024
We added seo-audit from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Amelia Chawla· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: seo-audit is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sofia Martin· Nov 11, 2024
seo-audit has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 68