If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperformance-reportExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performance-report from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performance-report. Access via /performance-report in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a marketing performance report with key metrics, trend analysis, insights, and optimization recommendations.
User runs /performance-report or asks for a marketing report, performance analysis, campaign results, or metrics summary.
Report type — determine which type of report the user needs:
Time period — the reporting window (last week, last month, last quarter, custom date range)
Data source:
Comparison period (optional) — prior period or year-over-year for trend context
Stakeholder audience (optional) — who will read this report (executive summary style vs. detailed analyst view)
Present core metrics in a summary table:
| Metric | This Period | Prior Period | Change | Target | Status |
|---|
Status indicators:
Campaign Report:
Channel Report (Email):
Channel Report (Social):
Channel Report (Paid):
Channel Report (SEO/Organic):
Content Performance:
Overall Marketing Report:
For each recommendation:
Prioritize recommendations in a 2x2 matrix format:
| Low Effort | High Effort | |
|---|---|---|
| High Impact | Do first | Plan for next sprint |
| Low Impact | Do if time allows | Deprioritize |
| Metric | Definition | Benchmark Range | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery rate | Emails delivered / emails sent | 95-99% | List health and sender reputation |
| Open rate | Unique opens / emails delivered | 15-30% | Subject line and sender effectiveness |
| Click-through rate (CTR) | Unique clicks / emails delivered | 2-5% | Content relevance and CTA effectiveness |
| Click-to-open rate (CTOR) | Unique clicks / unique opens | 10-20% | Email content quality (for those who opened) |
| Unsubscribe rate | Unsubscribes / emails delivered | <0.5% | Content-audience fit and frequency tolerance |
| Bounce rate | Bounces / emails sent | <2% | List quality and data hygiene |
| Conversion rate | Conversions / emails delivered | 1-5% | End-to-end email effectiveness |
| Revenue per email | Total revenue / emails sent | Varies | Direct revenue attribution |
| List growth rate | (New subscribers - unsubscribes) / total list | 2-5% monthly | Audience building health |
| Metric | Definition | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
| Impressions | Number of times content was displayed | Content distribution and reach |
| Reach | Number of unique users who saw content | Audience breadth |
| Engagement rate | (Likes + comments + shares) / reach | Content resonance |
| Click-through rate | Link clicks / impressions | Traffic driving effectiveness |
| Follower growth rate | Net new followers / total followers per period | Audience building |
| Share/Repost rate | Shares / reach | Content virality and advocacy |
| Video view rate | Views / impressions | Video content hook effectiveness |
| Video completion rate | Completed views / total views | Video content quality and length fit |
| Social share of voice | Your mentions / total category mentions | Brand visibility vs. competitors |
| Metric | Definition | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
| Impressions | Times ad was shown | Budget utilization and targeting breadth |
| Click-through rate (CTR) | Clicks / impressions | Ad creative and targeting relevance |
| Cost per click (CPC) | Total spend / clicks | Cost efficiency of traffic generation |
| Cost per mille (CPM) | Cost per 1,000 impressions | Awareness cost efficiency |
| Conversion rate | Conversions / clicks | Landing page and offer effectiveness |
| Cost per acquisition (CPA) | Total spend / conversions | Full-funnel cost efficiency |
| Return on ad spend (ROAS) | Revenue / ad spend | Revenue generation efficiency |
| Quality Score (search) | Google's relevance rating (1-10) | Ad-keyword-landing page alignment |
| Frequency | Average times a user sees the ad | Ad fatigue risk |
| View-through conversions | Conversions from users who saw but did not click | Display/awareness campaign influence |
| Metric | Definition | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
| Organic sessions | Visits from organic search | SEO effectiveness and content reach |
| Keyword rankings | Position for target keywords | Search visibility |
| Organic CTR | Clicks / impressions in search results | Title and meta description effectiveness |
| Pages indexed | Number of pages in search index | Crawlability and site health |
| Domain authority | Third-party authority score | Overall site strength |
| Backlinks | Number of external sites linking to you | Content authority and off-page SEO |
| Page load speed | Time to interactive | User experience and ranking factor |
| Organic conversion rate | Organic conversions / organic sessions | Content quality and intent alignment |
| Top entry pages | Most-visited pages from organic search | Content driving the most organic traffic |
| Metric | Definition | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
| Pageviews | Total views of content pages | Content reach and distribution |
| Unique visitors | Distinct users viewing content | Audience size |
| Average time on page | Time spent on content pages | Content engagement and depth |
| Bounce rate | Single-page sessions / total sessions | Content-audience fit and UX |
| Scroll depth | How far users scroll on a page | Content engagement through the piece |
| Social shares | Times content was shared on social | Content resonance and virality |
| Backlinks earned | External links to content | Content authority and SEO value |
| Lead generation | Leads attributed to content | Content conversion effectiveness |
| Content ROI | Revenue attributed / content production cost | Overall content investment return |
| Metric | Definition | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing qualified leads (MQLs) | Leads meeting marketing qualification criteria | Top-of-funnel effectiveness |
| Sales qualified leads (SQLs) | MQLs accepted by sales | Lead quality |
| MQL to SQL conversion rate | SQLs / MQLs | Marketing-sales alignment and lead quality |
| Pipeline generated | Dollar value of opportunities created | Marketing impact on revenue |
| Pipeline velocity | How fast deals move through pipeline | Campaign urgency and quality |
| Customer acquisition cost (CAC) | Total marketing + sales cost / new customers | Efficiency of customer acquisition |
| CAC payback period | Months to recover CAC from revenue | Unit economics health |
| Marketing-sourced revenue | Revenue from marketing-originated deals | Direct marketing contribution |
| Marketing-influenced revenue | Revenue from deals where marketing touched | Broader marketing impact |
Quick-scan format for team standups:
Standard stakeholder report:
Strategic review for leadership:
When analyzing performance data, look for:
Attribution determines which marketing touchpoints get credit for a conversion. This matters because buyers typically interact with multiple channels before converting.
| Model | How It Works | Best For | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last touch | 100% credit to last interaction before conversion | Understanding final conversion triggers | Ignores awareness and nurture |
| First touch | 100% credit to first interaction | Understanding top-of-funnel effectiveness | Ignores nurture and conversion drivers |
| Linear | Equal credit to all touchpoints | Fair representation of all channels | Does not reflect relative impact |
| Time decay | More credit to touchpoints closer to conversion | Balanced view favoring recent interactions | May undervalue awareness |
| Position-based (U-shaped) | 40% first, 40% last, 20% split among middle | Valuing both discovery and conversion | Somewhat arbitrary weighting |
| Data-driven | Algorithmic credit based on conversion patterns | Most accurate representation | Requires significant data volume |
| Funnel Stage | Problem Signal | Optimization Levers |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness | Low impressions, low reach | Budget, targeting, channel mix, creative format |
| Interest | Low CTR, low engagement | Ad creative, headlines, content hooks, audience targeting |
| Consideration | High bounce rate, low time on page | Landing page content, page speed, content relevance, UX |
| Conversion | Low conversion rate | Offer, CTA, form length, trust signals, page layout |
| Retention | High churn, low repeat engagement | Onboarding, email nurture, product experience, support |
Ask: "Would you like me to:
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Useful defaults in performance-report — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
performance-report is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: performance-report is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
performance-report reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
performance-report has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performance-report is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added performance-report from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performance-report is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in performance-report — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for performance-report matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 61