If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionlegal-responseExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches legal-response from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate legal-response. Access via /legal-response in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a response to a common legal inquiry using configured templates. Customizes the response with specific details and includes escalation triggers for situations that should not use a templated response.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Generated responses should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being sent, especially for regulated communications.
/legal-response [inquiry-type]
Common inquiry types:
dsr or data-subject-request -- Data subject access/deletion/correction requestshold or discovery-hold -- Litigation hold noticesvendor or vendor-question -- Vendor legal questionsnda or nda-request -- NDA requests from business teamsprivacy or privacy-inquiry -- Privacy-related questionssubpoena -- Subpoena or legal process responsesinsurance -- Insurance claim notificationscustom -- Use a custom templateIf no inquiry type is provided, ask the user what type of response they need and show available categories.
Accept the inquiry type from the user. If the type is ambiguous, show available categories and ask for clarification.
Look for templates in local settings (e.g., legal.local.md or a templates directory).
If templates are configured:
If no templates are configured:
Before generating any response, evaluate whether this situation has characteristics that should NOT use a templated response.
When an escalation trigger is detected:
Prompt the user for the details needed to customize the response:
Data Subject Request:
Discovery Hold:
Vendor Question:
NDA Request:
Populate the template with the gathered details. Ensure the response:
Present the draft response to the user for review before sending.
Required customization — Every templated response MUST be customized with:
Tone adjustment — Adjust tone based on:
Jurisdiction-specific adjustments:
If the user wants to create a new template, walk through the Template Creation Guide (see below) and present the finished template for review. Suggest the user save the approved template to their local settings for future use.
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Example template structure:
Subject: Your Data [Access/Deletion/Correction] Request - Reference {{request_id}}
Dear {{requester_name}},
We have received your request dated {{request_date}} to [access/delete/correct] your personal data under [applicable regulation].
[Acknowledgment / verification request / fulfillment details / denial basis]
We will respond substantively by {{response_deadline}}.
[Contact information]
[Rights information]
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Example template structure:
Subject: LEGAL HOLD NOTICE - {{matter_name}} - Action Required
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Dear {{custodian_name}},
You are receiving this notice because you may possess documents, communications, or data relevant to the matter referenced above.
PRESERVATION OBLIGATION:
Effective immediately, you must preserve all documents and electronically stored information (ESI) related to:
- Subject matter: {{hold_scope}}
- Date range: {{start_date}} to present
- Document types: {{document_types}}
DO NOT delete, destroy, modify, or discard any potentially relevant materials.
[Specific instructions for systems, email, chat, local files]
Please acknowledge receipt of this notice by {{acknowledgment_deadline}}.
Contact {{legal_contact}} with any questions.
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Critical note: Subpoena responses almost always require individualized counsel review. Templates serve as starting frameworks, not final responses.
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Templates should be organized by category and maintained in the team's local settings. Each template should include:
When helping users create new templates:
{{requester_name}}, {{response_deadline}}, {{matter_reference}}## Template: {{template_name}}
**Category**: {{category}}
**Version**: {{version}} | **Last Reviewed**: {{date}}
**Approved By**: {{approver}}
### Use When
- [Condition 1]
- [Condition 2]
### Do NOT Use When (Escalation Triggers)
- [Trigger 1]
- [Trigger 2]
### Variables
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| {{var1}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
| {{var2}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
### Subject Line
[Subject template with {{variables}}]
### Body
[Response body with {{variables}}]
### Follow-Up Actions
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
### Notes
[Any special instructions for users of this template]
## Generated Response: [Inquiry Type]
**To**: [recipient]
**Subject**: [subject line]
---
[Response body]
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
legal-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
legal-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added legal-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: legal-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
legal-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
legal-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
We added legal-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: legal-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
legal-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
legal-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 62