If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionincident-responseExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches incident-response from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate incident-response. Access via /incident-response in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Manage an incident from detection through postmortem.
/incident-response $ARGUMENTS
/incident-response new [description] # Start a new incident
/incident-response update [status] # Post a status update
/incident-response postmortem # Generate postmortem from incident data
If no mode is specified, ask what phase the incident is in.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INCIDENT RESPONSE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 1: TRIAGE │
│ ✓ Assess severity (SEV1-4) │
│ ✓ Identify affected systems and users │
│ ✓ Assign roles (IC, comms, responders) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: COMMUNICATE │
│ ✓ Draft internal status update │
│ ✓ Draft customer communication (if needed) │
│ ✓ Set up war room and cadence │
│ │
│ Phase 3: MITIGATE │
│ ✓ Document mitigation steps taken │
│ ✓ Track timeline of events │
│ ✓ Confirm resolution │
│ │
│ Phase 4: POSTMORTEM │
│ ✓ Blameless postmortem document │
│ ✓ Timeline reconstruction │
│ ✓ Root cause analysis (5 whys) │
│ ✓ Action items with owners │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Level | Criteria | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Service down, all users affected | Immediate, all-hands |
| SEV2 | Major feature degraded, many users affected | Within 15 min |
| SEV3 | Minor feature issue, some users affected | Within 1 hour |
| SEV4 | Cosmetic or low-impact issue | Next business day |
Provide clear, factual updates at regular cadence. Include: what's happening, who's affected, what we're doing, when the next update is.
## Incident Update: [Title]
**Severity:** SEV[1-4] | **Status:** Investigating | Identified | Monitoring | Resolved
**Impact:** [Who/what is affected]
**Last Updated:** [Timestamp]
### Current Status
[What we know now]
### Actions Taken
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
### Next Steps
- [What's happening next and ETA]
### Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |
## Postmortem: [Incident Title]
**Date:** [Date] | **Duration:** [X hours] | **Severity:** SEV[X]
**Authors:** [Names] | **Status:** Draft
### Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-language summary]
### Impact
- [Users affected]
- [Duration of impact]
- [Business impact if quantifiable]
### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |
### Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of what caused the incident]
### 5 Whys
1. Why did [symptom]? → [Because...]
2. Why did [cause 1]? → [Because...]
3. Why did [cause 2]? → [Because...]
4. Why did [cause 3]? → [Because...]
5. Why did [cause 4]? → [Root cause]
### What Went Well
- [Things that worked]
### What Went Poorly
- [Things that didn't work]
### Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| [Action] | [Person] | P0/P1/P2 | [Date] |
### Lessons Learned
[Key takeaways for the team]
If ~~monitoring is connected:
If ~~incident management is connected:
If ~~chat is connected:
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Registry listing for incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: incident-response is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
incident-response reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: incident-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
incident-response is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in incident-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
incident-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in incident-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend incident-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 65