compliance-check▌
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
/compliance-check -- Compliance Review
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, marketing campaign, or business initiative.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Compliance assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.
Usage
/compliance-check $ARGUMENTS
What I Need From You
Describe what you're planning to do. Examples:
- "We want to launch a referral program with cash rewards"
- "We're adding biometric authentication to our mobile app"
- "We need to process EU customer data in our US data center"
- "Marketing wants to use customer testimonials in ads"
Output
## Compliance Check: [Initiative]
### Summary
[Quick assessment: Proceed / Proceed with conditions / Requires further review]
### Applicable Regulations and Policies
| Regulation/Policy | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|-------------------|-----------|-----------------|
| [GDPR / CCPA / HIPAA / etc.] | [How it applies] | [What you need to do] |
### Requirements
| # | Requirement | Status | Action Needed |
|---|-------------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | [Requirement] | [Met / Not Met / Unknown] | [What to do] |
### Risk Areas
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation |
|------|----------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Most important action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Approvals Needed
| Approver | Why | Status |
|----------|-----|--------|
| [Person/Team] | [Reason] | [Pending] |
### Further Review Recommended
[Areas where outside counsel or specialist review is advised]
Privacy Regulation Overview
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.
Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:
- Lawful basis: Identify and document lawful basis for each processing activity (consent, contract, legitimate interest, legal obligation, vital interest, public task)
- Data subject rights: Respond to access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction, and objection requests within 30 days (extendable by 60 days for complex requests)
- Data protection impact assessments (DPIAs): Required for processing likely to result in high risk to individuals
- Breach notification: Notify supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach; notify affected individuals without undue delay if high risk
- Records of processing: Maintain Article 30 records of processing activities
- International transfers: Ensure appropriate safeguards for transfers outside EEA (SCCs, adequacy decisions, BCRs)
- DPO requirement: Appoint a Data Protection Officer if required (public authority, large-scale processing of special categories, large-scale systematic monitoring)
Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:
- Reviewing vendor DPAs for GDPR compliance
- Advising product teams on privacy by design requirements
- Responding to supervisory authority inquiries
- Managing cross-border data transfer mechanisms
- Reviewing consent mechanisms and privacy notices
CCPA / CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)
Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.
Key Obligations:
- Right to know: Consumers can request disclosure of personal information collected, used, and shared
- Right to delete: Consumers can request deletion of their personal information
- Right to opt-out: Consumers can opt out of the sale or sharing of personal information
- Right to correct: Consumers can request correction of inaccurate personal information (CPRA addition)
- Right to limit use of sensitive personal information: Consumers can limit use of sensitive PI to specific purposes (CPRA addition)
- Non-discrimination: Cannot discriminate against consumers who exercise their rights
- Privacy notice: Must provide a privacy notice at or before collection describing categories of PI collected and purposes
- Service provider agreements: Contracts with service providers must restrict use of PI to the specified business purpose
Response Timelines:
- Acknowledge receipt within 10 business days
- Respond substantively within 45 calendar days (extendable by 45 days with notice)
Other Key Regulations to Monitor
| Regulation | Jurisdiction | Key Differentiators |
|---|---|---|
| LGPD (Brazil) | Brazil | Similar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement |
| POPIA (South Africa) | South Africa | Information Regulator oversight; required registration of processing |
| PIPEDA (Canada) | Canada (federal) | Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized |
| PDPA (Singapore) | Singapore | Do Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement |
| Privacy Act (Australia) | Australia | Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme |
| PIPL (China) | China | Strict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight |
| UK GDPR | United Kingdom | Post-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy |
DPA Review Checklist
When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:
Required Elements (GDPR Article 28)
- Subject matter and duration: Clearly defined scope and term of processing
- Nature and purpose: Specific description of what processing will occur and why
- Type of personal data: Categories of personal data being processed
- Categories of data subjects: Whose personal data is being processed
- Controller obligations and rights: Controller's instructions and oversight rights
Processor Obligations
- Process only on documented instructions: Processor commits to process only per controller's instructions (with exception for legal requirements)
- Confidentiality: Personnel authorized to process have committed to confidentiality
- Security measures: Appropriate technical and organizational measures described (Article 32 reference)
- Sub-processor requirements:
- Written authorization requirement (general or specific)
- If general authorization: notification of changes with opportunity to object
- Sub-processors bound by same obligations via written agreement
- Processor remains liable for sub-processor performance
- Data subject rights assistance: Processor will assist controller in responding to data subject requests
- Security and breach assistance: Processor will assist with security obligations, breach notification, DPIAs, and prior consultation
- Deletion or return: On termination, delete or return all personal data (at controller's choice) and delete existing copies unless legal retention required
- Audit rights: Controller has right to conduct audits and inspections (or accept third-party audit reports)
- Breach notification: Processor will notify controller of personal data breaches without undue delay (ideally within 24-48 hours; must enable controller to meet 72-hour regulatory deadline)
International Transfers
- Transfer mechanism identified: SCCs, adequacy decision, BCRs, or other valid mechanism
- SCCs version: Using current EU SCCs (June 2021 version) if applicable
- Correct module: Appropriate SCC module selected (C2P, C2C, P2P, P2C)
- Transfer impact assessment: Completed if transferring to countries without adequacy decisions
- Supplementary measures: Technical, organizational, or contractual measures to address gaps identified in transfer impact assessment
- UK addendum: If UK personal data is in scope, UK International Data Transfer Addendum included
Practical Considerations
- Liability: DPA liability provisions align with (or don't conflict with) the main services agreement
- Termination alignment: DPA term aligns with the services agreement
- Data locations: Processing locations specified and acceptable
- Security standards: Specific security standards or certifications required (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)
- Insurance: Adequate insurance coverage for data processing activities
Common DPA Issues
| Issue | Risk | Standard Position |
|---|---|---|
| Blanket sub-processor authorization without notification | Loss of control over processing chain | Require notification with right to object |
| Breach notification timeline > 72 hours | May prevent timely regulatory notification | Require notification within 24-48 hours |
| No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports) | Cannot verify compliance | Accept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause |
| Data deletion timeline not specified | Data retained indefinitely | Require deletion within 30-90 days of termination |
| No data processing locations specified | Data could be processed anywhere | Require disclosure of processing locations |
| Outdated SCCs | Invalid transfer mechanism | Require current EU SCCs (2021 version) |
Data Subject Request Handling
Request Intake
When a data subject request is received:
-
Identify the request type:
- Access (copy of personal data)
- Rectification (correction of inaccurate data)
- Erasure / deletion ("right to be forgotten")
- Restriction of processing
- Data portability (structured, machine-readable format)
- Objection to processing
- Opt-out of sale/sharing (CCPA/CPRA)
- Limit use of sensitive personal information (CPRA)
-
Identify applicable regulation(s):
- Where is the data subject located?
- Which laws apply based on your organization's presence and activities?
- What are the specific requirements and timelines?
-
Verify identity:
- Confirm the requester is who they claim to be
- Use reasonable verification measures proportionate to the sensitivity of the data
- Do not require excessive documentation
-
Log the request:
- Date received
- Request type
- Requester identity
- Applicable regulation
- Response deadline
- Assigned handler
Response Timelines
| Regulation | Initial Acknowledgment | Substantive Response | Extension |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| CCPA/CPRA | 10 business days | 45 calendar days | +45 days (with notice) |
| UK GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| LGPD | Not specified | 15 days | Limited extensions |
Exemptions and Exceptions
Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:
Common exemptions across regulations:
- Legal claims defense or establishment
- Legal obligations requiring retention
- Public interest or official authority
- Freedom of expression and information (for erasure requests)
- Archiving in the public interest or scientific/historical research
Organization-specific considerations:
- Litigation hold: Data subject to a legal hold cannot be deleted
- Regulatory retention: Financial records, employment records, and other categories may have mandatory retention periods
- Third-party rights: Fulfilling the request might adversely affect the rights of others
Response Process
- Gather all personal data of the requester across systems
- Apply any exemptions and document the basis
- Prepare response: fulfill the request or explain why (in whole or part) it cannot be fulfilled
- If denying (in whole or part): cite the specific legal basis for denial
- Inform the requester of their right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority
- Document the response and retain records of the request and response
Regulatory Monitoring Basics
What to Monitor
Maintain awareness of developments in:
- Regulatory guidance: New or updated guidance from
How to use compliance-check on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add compliance-check
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches compliance-check from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate compliance-check. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /compliance-check) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★43 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend compliance-check for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Daniel Perez· Dec 24, 2024
compliance-check has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Kofi Verma· Dec 12, 2024
compliance-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024
We added compliance-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024
compliance-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Li· Nov 15, 2024
Useful defaults in compliance-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Anika Haddad· Nov 3, 2024
We added compliance-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Taylor· Oct 22, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: compliance-check is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for compliance-check matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Valentina Singh· Oct 6, 2024
compliance-check is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 43