brief▌
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
/brief -- Legal Team Briefing
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate contextual briefings for legal work. Supports three modes: daily brief, topic brief, and incident brief.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Briefings should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.
Invocation
/brief daily # Morning brief of legal-relevant items
/brief topic [query] # Research brief on a specific legal question
/brief incident [topic] # Rapid brief on a developing situation
If no mode is specified, ask the user which type of brief they need.
Modes
Daily Brief
A morning summary of everything a legal team member needs to know to start their day.
Sources to Scan
Check each connected source for legal-relevant items:
Email (if connected):
- New contract requests or review requests
- Compliance questions or reports
- Responses from counterparties on active negotiations
- Flagged or urgent items from the legal team inbox
- External counsel communications
- Regulatory or legal update newsletters
Calendar (if connected):
- Today's meetings that need legal prep (board meetings, deal reviews, vendor calls)
- Upcoming deadlines this week (contract expirations, filing deadlines, response deadlines)
- Recurring legal team syncs
Chat (if connected):
- Overnight messages in legal team channels
- Direct messages requesting legal input
- Mentions of legal-relevant topics (contract, compliance, privacy, NDA, terms)
- Escalations or urgent requests
CLM (if connected):
- Contracts awaiting review or signature
- Approaching expiration dates (next 30 days)
- Newly executed agreements
CRM (if connected):
- Deals moving to stages that require legal involvement
- New opportunities flagged for legal review
Output Format
## Daily Legal Brief -- [Date]
### Urgent / Action Required
[Items needing immediate attention, sorted by urgency]
### Contract Pipeline
- **Awaiting Your Review**: [count and list]
- **Pending Counterparty Response**: [count and list]
- **Approaching Deadlines**: [items due this week]
### New Requests
[Contract review requests, NDA requests, compliance questions received since last brief]
### Calendar Today
[Meetings with legal relevance and what prep is needed]
### Team Activity
[Key messages or updates from legal team channels]
### This Week's Deadlines
[Upcoming deadlines and filing dates]
### Sources Not Available
[Any sources that were not connected or returned errors]
Topic Brief
Research and brief on a specific legal question or topic across available sources.
Workflow
- Accept the topic query from the user
- Search across connected sources:
- Documents: Internal memos, prior analyses, playbooks, precedent
- Email: Prior communications on the topic
- Chat: Team discussions about the topic
- CLM: Related contracts or clauses
- Synthesize findings into a structured brief
Output Format
## Topic Brief: [Topic]
### Summary
[2-3 sentence executive summary of findings]
### Background
[Context and history from internal sources]
### Current State
[What the organization's current position or approach is, based on available documents]
### Key Considerations
[Important factors, risks, or open questions]
### Internal Precedent
[Prior decisions, memos, or positions found in internal sources]
### Gaps
[What information is missing or what sources were not available]
### Recommended Next Steps
[What the user should do with this information]
Important Notes
- Topic briefs synthesize what is available in connected sources; they do not substitute for formal legal research
- If the topic requires current legal authority or case law, recommend the user consult a legal research platform (Westlaw, Lexis, etc.) or outside counsel
- Always note the limitations of the sources searched
Incident Brief
Rapid briefing for developing situations that require immediate legal attention (data breaches, litigation threats, regulatory inquiries, IP disputes, etc.).
Workflow
- Accept the incident topic or description
- Rapidly scan all connected sources for relevant context:
- Email: Communications about the incident
- Chat: Real-time discussions and escalations
- Documents: Relevant policies, response plans, insurance coverage
- Calendar: Scheduled response meetings
- CLM: Affected contracts, indemnification provisions, insurance requirements
- Compile into an actionable incident brief
Output Format
## Incident Brief: [Topic]
**Prepared**: [timestamp]
**Classification**: [severity assessment if determinable]
### Situation Summary
[What is known about the incident]
### Timeline
[Chronological summary of events based on available sources]
### Immediate Legal Considerations
[Regulatory notification requirements, preservation obligations, privilege concerns]
### Relevant Agreements
[Contracts, insurance policies, or other agreements that may be implicated]
### Internal Response
[What response activity has already occurred based on email/chat]
### Key Contacts
[Relevant internal and external contacts identified from sources]
### Recommended Immediate Actions
1. [Most urgent action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [etc.]
### Information Gaps
[What is not yet known and needs to be determined]
### Sources Checked
[What was searched and what was not available]
Important Notes for Incident Briefs
- Speed matters. Produce the brief quickly with available information rather than waiting for complete information
- Flag any litigation hold or preservation obligations immediately
- Note privilege considerations (mark the brief as attorney-client privileged / work product if appropriate)
- If the incident may involve a data breach, flag applicable notification deadlines (e.g., 72 hours for GDPR)
- Recommend outside counsel engagement if the matter is significant
General Notes
- If sources are unavailable, note the gaps prominently so the user knows what was not checked
- For daily briefs, learn the user's preferences over time (what they find useful, what they want filtered out)
- Briefs should be actionable: every item should have a clear next step or reason for inclusion
- Keep briefs concise. Link to source materials rather than reproducing them in full
How to use brief on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add brief
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches brief from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate brief. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /brief) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★35 reviews- ★★★★★Chen Rahman· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: brief is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Zara Mehta· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for brief matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Fatima Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
brief is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Emma Diallo· Nov 23, 2024
brief reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Li Gonzalez· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for brief matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Advait Abbas· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: brief is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Emma Torres· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for brief matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chen Ghosh· Oct 6, 2024
brief reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Chen· Oct 2, 2024
brief is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Anaya Sethi· Sep 25, 2024
I recommend brief for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 35