Create institutional-quality equity research initiation reports through a structured 5-task workflow. Each task must be executed separately with verified inputs.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioninitiating-coverageExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches initiating-coverage from anthropics/financial-services-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate initiating-coverage. Access via /initiating-coverage in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
2
total installs
2
this week
7.3K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
2
installs
2
this week
7.3K
stars
Create institutional-quality equity research initiation reports through a structured 5-task workflow. Each task must be executed separately with verified inputs.
This skill produces comprehensive first-time coverage reports following institutional standards (JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley format). Tasks are executed individually, each verifying prerequisites before proceeding.
Default Font: Times New Roman throughout all documents (unless user specifies otherwise).
THIS SKILL OPERATES IN SINGLE-TASK MODE ONLY.
When user requests:
REQUIRED RESPONSE:
Ask which specific task to perform:
I can help you create an equity research initiation report for [Company].
This involves 5 separate tasks that need to be completed individually:
1. Company Research - Research business, management, industry
2. Financial Modeling - Build projection model
3. Valuation Analysis - DCF and comparable companies
4. Chart Generation - Create 25-35 charts
5. Report Assembly - Compile final report
Which task would you like to start with?
When user explicitly requests all tasks together:
I understand you'd like to complete the entire initiation report pipeline.
Currently, this skill supports executing one task at a time, which allows
for better quality control and review at each stage.
We're working on a seamless end-to-end workflow that will make this process
more automated, but for now, we'll need to complete each task separately.
Would you like to start with Task 1 (Company Research)?
Never automatically assume which task to start - always ask user to confirm.
Never execute multiple tasks in sequence - complete one task, deliver outputs, then wait for next user request.
DELIVER ONLY THE SPECIFIED OUTPUTS. DO NOT CREATE EXTRA DOCUMENTS.
Each task specifies exact deliverables. Do NOT create:
Why: These extras waste context and are not part of the professional workflow.
What TO deliver:
If a deliverable is not listed above, DO NOT CREATE IT.
Select which task to execute:
| Task | Name | Prerequisites | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Company Research | Company name/ticker | 6-8K word document |
| 2 | Financial Modeling | 10-K or financials access | Excel model (6 tabs) |
| 3 | Valuation Analysis | Financial model (Task 2) | Valuation + price target |
| 4 | Chart Generation | Tasks 1, 2, 3 + external data | 25-35 PNG/JPG charts |
| 5 | Report Assembly | ALL previous tasks (1-4) | 30-50 page DOCX report |
Pattern 1: User specifies a specific task
User: "Use initiating-coverage, Task 1 for Tesla"
Response: ✅ Execute Task 1 immediately
Pattern 2: User asks for "initiation report" or "full pipeline"
User: "Create a coverage initiation report for Tesla"
Response: ❌ DO NOT start any task automatically
✅ Ask which task to start with (see template above)
Pattern 3: User wants to do "all tasks" or "entire workflow"
User: "I want to complete all 5 tasks for Tesla"
Response: ❌ DO NOT chain tasks together
✅ Explain one-at-a-time limitation (see template above)
✅ Ask if they want to start with Task 1
Executing a single task:
"Use initiating-coverage skill, Task 1 for Tesla"
"Do Task 2 of initiating-coverage for Tesla"
"Run Task 3 for Tesla using the initiating-coverage skill"
Completing full report (requires 5 separate requests):
Request 1: "Do Task 1 for Tesla" → Complete → Deliver outputs
Request 2: "Do Task 2 for Tesla" → Complete → Deliver outputs
Request 3: "Do Task 3 for Tesla" → Complete → Deliver outputs
Request 4: "Do Task 4 for Tesla" → Complete → Deliver outputs
Request 5: "Do Task 5 for Tesla" → Complete → Deliver outputs
For a complete initiation report, tasks must be executed in separate user requests following this order:
Request 1: Task 1 - Company Research (independent)
↓ [User reviews outputs and requests next task]
Request 2: Task 2 - Financial Modeling (independent)
↓ [User reviews outputs and requests next task]
Request 3: Task 3 - Valuation Analysis (requires Task 2 output)
↓ [User reviews outputs and requests next task]
Request 4: Task 4 - Chart Generation (requires Tasks 2 & 3 outputs)
↓ [User reviews outputs and requests next task]
Request 5: Task 5 - Report Assembly (requires ALL previous task outputs)
Note: Tasks 1 and 2 can be run in any order. Tasks 3-5 have strict dependencies and must verify inputs before proceeding.
Purpose: Research company's business, management, competitive position, industry, and risks.
Prerequisites: ✅ None (fully independent)
Process:
Output: Company Research Document (6,000-8,000 words)
File name: [Company]_Research_Document_[Date].md
⚠️ DELIVER ONLY THIS 1 FILE. NO completion summaries, no extra documents.
⚠️ DO NOT TAKE SHORTCUTS:
Verification before proceeding: None required for this task.
Purpose: Extract historical financials and build comprehensive Excel financial model with projections and scenarios.
Prerequisites: ⚠️ Verify before starting
Input Verification:
BEFORE STARTING - Select approach:
Option A: Extract financials (most common)
- [ ] Have access to 10-K or financial statements?
- [ ] Ready to extract 3-5 years of data?
Option B: User provided pre-extracted financials
- [ ] Historical financials file received?
- [ ] Contains income statement, cash flow, balance sheet (3-5 years)?
Optional:
- [ ] Company research (Task 1) complete for context?
Process:
Output: Excel Financial Model (.xlsx)
File name: [Company]_Financial_Model_[Date].xlsx
⚠️ DELIVER ONLY THIS 1 FILE. NO completion summaries, no extra documents.
⚠️ DO NOT TAKE SHORTCUTS:
Verification before proceeding to Task 3:
Purpose: Perform comprehensive valuation using DCF, comparables, and precedent transactions.
Prerequisites: ⚠️ Verify before starting
⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT START THIS TASK UNLESS TASK 2 IS COMPLETE
This task requires the financial model from Task 2. Starting without it will result in incomplete work.
IF TASK 2 IS NOT COMPLETE: Stop immediately and inform the user that Task 2 (Financial Modeling) must be completed first. Do not attempt to proceed or create placeholder valuations.
Input Verification:
BEFORE STARTING:
- [ ] Task 2 complete? (Financial model exists)
- [ ] Model file path/location known?
- [ ] Can access projected financials from model?
Required from model:
- [ ] Projected FCF (5 years)
- [ ] Revenue projections
- [ ] EBITDA projections
- [ ] Terminal year metrics
Process:
Output: Valuation Analysis (4-6 pages + Excel tabs)
Files:
[Company]_Valuation_Analysis_[Date].md (written analysis document)[Company]_Financial_Model_[Date].xlsx (from Task 2)
⚠️ DELIVER ONLY: 1 markdown file + 4 tabs added to existing Excel. NO completion summaries, no extra documents.
⚠️ DO NOT TAKE SHORTCUTS:
Verification before proceeding to Task 4:
Purpose: Generate 25-35 professional financial charts for the report.
Prerequisites: ⚠️ Verify before starting
⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT START THIS TASK UNLESS TASKS 1, 2, AND 3 ARE COMPLETE
This task requires outputs from all three previous tasks. Starting without them will result in incomplete charts.
IF ANY OF TASKS 1, 2, OR 3 ARE NOT COMPLETE: Stop immediately and inform the user which tasks need to be completed first. The specific requirements are:
Do not attempt to create placeholder charts or skip charts due to missing data.
Input Verification:
BEFORE STARTING:
- [ ] Task 1 complete? (Company research exists)
- [ ] Task 2 complete? (Financial model exists)
- [ ] Task 3 complete? (Valuation analysis exists)
- [ ] Can access external market data sources?
Required from Task 1:
- [ ] Company history and milestones (for charts 05, 06)
- [ ] Management team structure (for chart 07)
- [ ] Product portfolio details (for chart 08)
- [ ] Customer segmentation data (for chart 09)
- [ ] Competitive landscape analysis (for charts 16, 17, 18)
- [ ] TAM sizing and market data (for chart 15)
Required from Task 2:
- [ ] Revenue by product (historical + projected) - for chart 03 ⭐
- [ ] Revenue by geography (historical + projected) - for chart 04 ⭐
- [ ] Income statement with margins (for charts 02, 10, 11)
- [ ] Cash flow statement (for chart 12)
- [ ] Scenario comparison data (for chart 14)
Required from Task 3:
- [ ] DCF sensitivity matrix - for chart 28 ⭐
- [ ] DCF components (for chart 29)
- [ ] Comparable companies data (for charts 30, 31)
- [ ] Valuation ranges - for chart 32 ⭐
Required from External Sources:
- [ ] Historical stock price data (for chart 01)
- [ ] Historical valuation multiples (for chart 34)
Process:
Output: 25-35 Professional Chart Files (PNG/JPG, 300 DPI) packaged in zip
4 MANDATORY Charts (must be present) ⭐:
25 REQUIRED Charts (specific list):
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Useful defaults in initiating-coverage — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Keeps context tight: initiating-coverage is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
initiating-coverage is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: initiating-coverage is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for initiating-coverage matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
initiating-coverage fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend initiating-coverage for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
initiating-coverage is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: initiating-coverage is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: initiating-coverage is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 66