Load with: base.md + web-content.md + site-architecture.md
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionaeo-optimizationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches aeo-optimization from alinaqi/claude-bootstrap and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate aeo-optimization. Access via /aeo-optimization in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
570
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
570
stars
Load with: base.md + web-content.md + site-architecture.md
Purpose: Optimize content for AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) so your brand gets cited in AI-generated answers.
Source: Based on HubSpot's AEO Guide and industry best practices.
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE GREAT DECOUPLING │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Impressions ≠ Clicks anymore. │
│ AI engines compile answers from multiple sources. │
│ More buyer journey happens inside chat experiences. │
│ 58% of Google searches = zero clicks (AI overviews). │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ THE OPPORTUNITY │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Shape what AI engines say about your category and product. │
│ Get cited as the authoritative source. │
│ Best answer > Best page ranking. │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key Stats:
AI engines use three main signals to select content for answers:
Facts that appear across multiple credible sources get trusted and reused.
How to build consensus:
Net-new insight beats generic advice. AI engines prefer content that adds value.
How to add information gain:
Clear entities and tidy structure reduce ambiguity and boost quotability.
How to optimize structure:
What they are: Compact facts that AI engines (and humans) can't misread.
Pattern: [Subject] [verb] [object].
✅ GOOD (clear triples):
- HubSpot CRM syncs contact and company data.
- Lead Scoring assigns priority based on engagement.
- Workflows trigger email sequences from events.
❌ BAD (vague, no clear entity):
- The system helps with various tasks.
- It can do many things for users.
- This improves overall performance.
For every key claim, ask:
Every substantive paragraph should follow this structure:
[Feature] helps [User/Role] with [Job].
It [mechanism/inputs] to [process].
Teams see [metric/result] in [timeframe/context].
Triples:
- [Subject] [verb] [object].
- [Subject] [verb] [object].
Lead Scoring helps sales teams prioritize prospects. It combines
page views, email engagement, and firmographic data to assign a
numeric score, then auto-enrolls high scorers into follow-up
sequences. Reps focus on qualified accounts and book 40% more
meetings.
- Lead Scoring assigns scores from engagement data.
- High scorers trigger automated follow-up sequences.
Goal: Define the category, tie it to your product, earn citations.
# What is [Category]? — [1-2 line value promise]
## What is [Category]? (~80 words)
[Plain definition in everyday language. Name adjacent entities.]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
## Why it matters now (~60 words)
[One paragraph. Mention shift to answers over links; tie to buyer outcomes.]
## How to apply it (3-5 bullets)
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
- [Action 3]
## FAQ
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence answer]
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence answer]
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence answer]
---
**Links:** [Category hub] | [Product/Feature] | [Credible source 1] | [Credible source 2]
**CTA:** [Demo / Template / Signup]
**Schema:** Article + FAQ. Author + last updated.
Goal: Clarify capability, fit, and next step; reinforce category linkage.
# [Product/Feature] — [Outcome in 3-5 words]
**[Product/Feature] enables [Outcome] for [User/Role].**
## [Feature Area 1]
[2-4 sentences using Feature → How → Outcome]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
## [Feature Area 2]
[2-4 sentences using Feature → How → Outcome]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
## [Feature Area 3]
[2-4 sentences using Feature → How → Outcome]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
## FAQ
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence]
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence]
**Q: [Question]?**
A: [~1 sentence]
---
**Links:** Back to [Category Explainer] | Forward to [Demo/Trial]
**Proof:** [Benchmark/Analyst/Customer proof]
**Notes:** Requirements/limits (pricing tier, integrations)
**Schema:** Article + FAQ. Author + last updated.
Goal: Help readers decide with clear criteria; earn fair citations.
# [Product] vs. [Alternative] — Which fits [Use case]?
## Comparison Table
| Criterion | [Product] | [Alt A] | [Alt B] | Source |
|-----------|-----------|---------|---------|--------|
| [Feature/Limit] | [value] | [value] | [value] | [link] |
| [Requirement] | [value] | [value] | [value] | [link] |
| [Best for] | [value] | [value] | [value] | [link] |
*Source-back all claims in the table or footnotes.*
## Fit Statements
1. **[Product]** suits [Team/Use case] when [Condition].
2. **[Alt A]** fits [Team/Use case] when [Condition].
3. **[Alt B]** works for [Team/Use case] when [Condition].
---
**Links:** [Category Explainer] | [Feature pages]
**CTA:** [Try / Demo / Talk to Sales]
**Schema:** Article. Author + last updated.
Goal: Connect product to outcomes in a context readers recognize.
# [Industry/Use Case] — [Outcome KPI]
**Teams reduce [Metric] by [Y%] in [Timeframe].**
## Mini Case Study
[Company/Role] used [Product/Feature] to [Action], resulting in
[Metric improvement] within [Timeframe].
## How It Works
### [Feature 1]
[Feature → How → Outcome paragraph]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
### [Feature 2]
[Feature → How → Outcome paragraph]
Triples:
1. [Subject] [verb] [object].
2. [Subject] [verb] [object].
## Who Uses This
**Roles:** [Role 1], [Role 2], [Role 3]
**Workflows:** [Workflow 1], [Workflow 2]
**Integrations:** [Integration 1], [Integration 2]
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
646mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
213parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorywrite-a-prd
128mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★39 reviews- LLi Brown★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in aeo-optimization — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- NNikhil Anderson★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
We added aeo-optimization from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for aeo-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- AAma Patel★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: aeo-optimization is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- PPiyush G★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: aeo-optimization is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- NNeel Flores★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
aeo-optimization has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
aeo-optimization reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- EEmma White★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
I recommend aeo-optimization for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- NNikhil Huang★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
aeo-optimization fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
I recommend aeo-optimization for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 39
1 / 4Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.