Test-driven development for Laravel applications using PHPUnit and Pest with 80%+ coverage (unit + feature).
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionlaravel-tddExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches laravel-tdd from affaan-m/everything-claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate laravel-tdd. Access via /laravel-tdd in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
142.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
142.9K
stars
Test-driven development for Laravel applications using PHPUnit and Pest with 80%+ coverage (unit + feature).
Choose layers based on scope:
RefreshDatabase for most feature/integration tests (runs migrations once per test run, then wraps each test in a transaction when supported; in-memory databases may re-migrate per test)DatabaseTransactions when the schema is already migrated and you only need per-test rollbackDatabaseMigrations when you need a full migrate/fresh for every test and can afford the costUse RefreshDatabase as the default for tests that touch the database: for databases with transaction support, it runs migrations once per test run (via a static flag) and wraps each test in a transaction; for :memory: SQLite or connections without transactions, it migrates before each test. Use DatabaseTransactions when the schema is already migrated and you only need per-test rollbacks.
use App\Models\User;
use Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\RefreshDatabase;
use Tests\TestCase;
final class ProjectControllerTest extends TestCase
{
use RefreshDatabase;
public function test_owner_can_create_project(): void
{
$user = User::factory()->create();
$response = $this->actingAs($user)->postJson('/api/projects', [
'name' => 'New Project',
]);
$response->assertCreated();
$this->assertDatabaseHas('projects', ['name' => 'New Project']);
}
}
use App\Models\Project;
use App\Models\User;
use Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\RefreshDatabase;
use Tests\TestCase;
final class ProjectIndexTest extends TestCase
{
use RefreshDatabase;
public function test_projects_index_returns_paginated_results(): void
{
$user = User::factory()->create();
Project::factory()->count(3)->for($user)->create();
$response = $this->actingAs($user)->getJson('/api/projects');
$response->assertOk();
$response->assertJsonStructure(['success', 'data', 'error', 'meta']);
}
}
use App\Models\User;
use Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\RefreshDatabase;
use function Pest\Laravel\actingAs;
use function Pest\Laravel\assertDatabaseHas;
uses(RefreshDatabase::class);
test('owner can create project', function () {
$user = User::factory()->create();
$response = actingAs($user)->postJson('/api/projects', [
'name' => 'New Project',
]);
$response->assertCreated();
assertDatabaseHas('projects', ['name' => 'New Project']);
});
use App\Models\Project;
use App\Models\User;
use Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\RefreshDatabase;
use function Pest\Laravel\actingAs;
uses(RefreshDatabase::class);
test('projects index returns paginated results', function () {
$user = User::factory()->create();
Project::factory()->count(3)->for($user)->create();
$response = actingAs($user)->getJson('/api/projects');
$response->assertOk();
$response->assertJsonStructure(['success', 'data', 'error', 'meta']);
});
$user = User::factory()->state(['role' => 'admin'])->create();
RefreshDatabase for clean stateassertDatabaseHas over manual queriesuse App\Models\Project;
use Illuminate✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
645mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
213parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorywrite-a-prd
128mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.7★★★★★54 reviews- IIsabella Taylor★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
I recommend laravel-tdd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- NNaina Chawla★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: laravel-tdd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- DDev Thomas★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
laravel-tdd has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
laravel-tdd fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- KKwame Reddy★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
laravel-tdd reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
laravel-tdd is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- LLucas Thomas★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: laravel-tdd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- AAnika Johnson★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
I recommend laravel-tdd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AArya Farah★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in laravel-tdd — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
Keeps context tight: laravel-tdd is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 54
1 / 6Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.