Intelligent model routing, budget tracking, and retry logic to optimize LLM API costs without sacrificing quality.
Works with
Routes requests to cheaper models (Haiku) for simple tasks and expensive models (Sonnet, Opus) only when complexity thresholds are met, reducing spend by 3–19x on routine work
Tracks cumulative API costs with immutable dataclasses, enforces budget limits, and fails early to prevent overspend
Implements narrow retry logic that retries only on transient errors (network, ra
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncost-aware-llm-pipelineExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches cost-aware-llm-pipeline from affaan-m/everything-claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate cost-aware-llm-pipeline. Access via /cost-aware-llm-pipeline in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
142.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
142.9K
stars
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-4-6"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000 # chars
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30 # items
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET # Complex task
return MODEL_HAIKU # Simple task (3-4x cheaper)
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
Retry only on transient errors. Fail fast on authentication or bad request errors.
from anthropic import (
APIConnectionError,
InternalServerError,
RateLimitError,
)
_RETRYABLE_ERRORS = (APIConnectionError, RateLimitError, InternalServerError)
_MAX_RETRIES = 3
def call_with_retry(func, *, max_retries: int = _MAX_RETRIES):
"""Retry only on transient errors, fail fast on others."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return func()
except _RETRYABLE_ERRORS:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
# AuthenticationError, BadRequestError etc. → raise immediately
Cache long system prompts to avoid resending them on every request.
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}, # Cache this
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": user_input, # Variable part
},
],
}
]
Combine all four techniques in a single pipeline function:
def process(text: str, config: Config, tracker: CostTracker) -> tuple[Result, CostTracker]:
# 1. Route model
model = select_model(len(text), estimated_items, config.force_model)
# 2. Check budget
if tracker.over_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(tracker.total_cost, tracker.budget_limit)
# 3. Call with retry + caching
response = call_with_retry(lambda: client.messages.create(
model=model,
messages=build_cached_messages(system_prompt, text),
))
# 4. Track cost (immutable)
record = CostRecord(model=model, input_tokens=..., output_tokens=..., cost_usd=...)
tracker = tracker.add(record)
return parse_result(response), tracker
| Model | Input ($/1M tokens) | Output ($/1M tokens) | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.80 | $4.00 | 1x |
| Sonnet 4.6 | $3.00 | $15.00 | ~4x |
| Opus 4.5 | $15.00 | $75.00 | ~19x |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
am-will/codex-skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: cost-aware-llm-pipeline is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added cost-aware-llm-pipeline from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: cost-aware-llm-pipeline is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
cost-aware-llm-pipeline fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend cost-aware-llm-pipeline for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
cost-aware-llm-pipeline has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
cost-aware-llm-pipeline fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added cost-aware-llm-pipeline from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in cost-aware-llm-pipeline — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for cost-aware-llm-pipeline matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 28