content-engine▌
affaan-m/everything-claude-code · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Transform one idea into platform-native content across X, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, and newsletters without cross-posting.
- ›Adapts source assets (articles, videos, demos, docs) into distinct platform variants with native hooks, pacing, and CTAs
- ›Covers five platforms with specific guidance: X (fast opens, one idea per post), LinkedIn (strong first lines, explicit lessons), short video (attention-grabbing first 3 seconds), YouTube (early results, visual refresh every 20-30 seconds), and n
Content Engine
Build platform-native content without flattening the author's real voice into platform slop.
When to Activate
- writing X posts or threads
- drafting LinkedIn posts or launch updates
- scripting short-form video or YouTube explainers
- repurposing articles, podcasts, demos, docs, or internal notes into public content
- building a launch sequence or ongoing content system around a product, insight, or narrative
Non-Negotiables
- Start from source material, not generic post formulas.
- Adapt the format for the platform, not the persona.
- One post should carry one actual claim.
- Specificity beats adjectives.
- No engagement bait unless the user explicitly asks for it.
Source-First Workflow
Before drafting, identify the source set:
- published articles
- notes or internal memos
- product demos
- docs or changelogs
- transcripts
- screenshots
- prior posts from the same author
If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing.
Use brand-voice as the canonical workflow when voice consistency matters across more than one output.
Voice Handling
brand-voice is the canonical voice layer.
Run it first when:
- there are multiple downstream outputs
- the user explicitly cares about writing style
- the content is launch, outreach, or reputation-sensitive
Reuse the resulting VOICE PROFILE here instead of rebuilding a second voice model.
If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, still treat brand-voice as the source of truth and feed it the best live or source-derived material available.
Hard Bans
Delete and rewrite any of these:
- "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
- "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
- "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
- ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
- forced casualness on LinkedIn
- fake engagement padding that was not present in the source material
Platform Adaptation Rules
X
- open with the strongest claim, artifact, or tension
- keep the compression if the source voice is compressed
- if writing a thread, each post must advance the argument
- do not pad with context the audience does not need
- expand only enough for people outside the immediate niche to follow
- do not turn it into a fake lesson post unless the source material actually is reflective
- no corporate inspiration cadence
- no praise-stacking, no "journey" filler
Short Video
- script around the visual sequence and proof points
- first seconds should show the result, problem, or punch
- do not write narration that sounds better on paper than on screen
YouTube
- show the result or tension early
- organize by argument or progression, not filler sections
- use chaptering only when it helps clarity
Newsletter
- open with the point, conflict, or artifact
- do not spend the first paragraph warming up
- every section needs to add something new
Repurposing Flow
- Pick the anchor asset.
- Extract 3 to 7 atomic claims or scenes.
- Rank them by sharpness, novelty, and proof.
- Assign one strong idea per output.
- Adapt structure for each platform.
- Strip platform-shaped filler.
- Run the quality gate.
Deliverables
When asked for a campaign, return:
- a short voice profile if voice matching matters
- the core angle
- platform-native drafts
- posting order only if it helps execution
- gaps that must be filled before publishing
Quality Gate
Before delivering:
- every draft sounds like the intended author, not the platform stereotype
- every draft contains a real claim, proof point, or concrete observation
- no generic hype language remains
- no fake engagement bait remains
- no duplicated copy across platforms unless requested
- any CTA is earned and user-approved
Related Skills
brand-voicefor source-derived voice profilescrosspostfor platform-specific distributionx-apifor sourcing recent posts and publishing approved X output
How to use content-engine on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add content-engine
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches content-engine from GitHub repository affaan-m/everything-claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate content-engine. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /content-engine) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★75 reviews- ★★★★★Yuki Robinson· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend content-engine for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Noah Bhatia· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: content-engine is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Layla Sharma· Dec 8, 2024
content-engine reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noah Desai· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: content-engine is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Aditi Rao· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend content-engine for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: content-engine is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Layla Yang· Nov 27, 2024
content-engine has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Olivia Nasser· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for content-engine matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Zara Huang· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in content-engine — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★William Lopez· Nov 23, 2024
content-engine is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 75