m07-concurrency

actionbook/rust-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m07-concurrency
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

skill.md

Concurrency

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Is this CPU-bound or I/O-bound, and what's the sharing model?

Before choosing concurrency primitives:

  • What's the workload type?
  • What data needs to be shared?
  • What's the thread safety requirement?

Error → Design Question

Error Don't Just Say Ask Instead
E0277 Send "Add Send bound" Should this type cross threads?
E0277 Sync "Wrap in Mutex" Is shared access really needed?
Future not Send "Use spawn_local" Is async the right choice?
Deadlock "Reorder locks" Is the locking design correct?

Thinking Prompt

Before adding concurrency:

  1. What's the workload?

    • CPU-bound → threads (std::thread, rayon)
    • I/O-bound → async (tokio, async-std)
    • Mixed → hybrid approach
  2. What's the sharing model?

    • No sharing → message passing (channels)
    • Immutable sharing → Arc
    • Mutable sharing → Arc<Mutex> or Arc<RwLock>
  3. What are the Send/Sync requirements?

    • Cross-thread ownership → Send
    • Cross-thread references → Sync
    • Single-thread async → spawn_local

Trace Up ↑ (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Don't just fix the error. Trace UP to find domain constraints.

Domain Detection Table

Context Keywords Load Domain Skill Key Constraint
Web API, HTTP, axum, actix, handler domain-web Handlers run on any thread
交易, 支付, trading, payment domain-fintech Audit + thread safety
gRPC, kubernetes, microservice domain-cloud-native Distributed tracing
CLI, terminal, clap domain-cli Usually single-thread OK

Example: Web API + Rc Error

"Rc cannot be sent between threads" in Web API context
    ↑ DETECT: "Web API" → Load domain-web
    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Shared state must be thread-safe"
    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Rc in state" is Common Mistake
    ↓ DESIGN: Use Arc<T> with State extractor
    ↓ IMPL: axum::extract::State<Arc<AppConfig>>

Generic Trace

"Send not satisfied for my type"
    ↑ Ask: What domain is this? Load domain-* skill
    ↑ Ask: Does this type need to cross thread boundaries?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (is the data model correct?)
Situation Trace To Question
Send/Sync in Web domain-web What's the state management pattern?
Send/Sync in CLI domain-cli Is multi-thread really needed?
Mutex vs channels m09-domain Shared state or message passing?
Async vs threads m10-performance What's the workload profile?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Need parallelism for CPU work"
    ↓ Use: std::thread or rayon

"Need concurrency for I/O"
    ↓ Use: async/await with tokio

"Need to share immutable data across threads"
    ↓ Use: Arc<T>

"Need to share mutable data across threads"
    ↓ Use: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
    ↓ Or: channels for message passing

"Need simple atomic operations"
    ↓ Use: AtomicBool, AtomicUsize, etc.

Send/Sync Markers

Marker Meaning Example
Send Can transfer ownership between threads Most types
Sync Can share references between threads Arc<T>
!Send Must stay on one thread Rc<T>
!Sync No shared refs across threads RefCell<T>

Quick Reference

Pattern Thread-Safe Blocking Use When
std::thread Yes Yes CPU-bound parallelism
async/await Yes No I/O-bound concurrency
Mutex<T> Yes Yes Shared mutable state
RwLock<T> Yes Yes Read-heavy shared state
mpsc::channel Yes Optional Message passing
Arc<Mutex<T>> Yes Yes Shared mutable across threads

Decision Flowchart

What type of work?
├─ CPU-bound → std::thread or rayon
├─ I/O-bound → async/await
└─ Mixed → hybrid (spawn_blocking)

Need to share data?
├─ No → message passing (channels)
├─ Immutable → Arc<T>
└─ Mutable →
   ├─ Read-heavy → Arc<RwLock<T>>
   └─ Write-heavy → Arc<Mutex<T>>
   └─ Simple counter → AtomicUsize

Async context?
├─ Type is Send → tokio::spawn
├─ Type is !Send → spawn_local
└─ Blocking code → spawn_blocking

Common Errors

Error Cause Fix
E0277 Send not satisfied Non-Send in async Use Arc or spawn_local
E0277 Sync not satisfied Non-Sync shared Wrap with Mutex
Deadlock Lock ordering Consistent lock order
future is not Send Non-Send across await Drop before await
MutexGuard across await Guard held during suspend Scope guard properly

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Why Bad Better
Arc<Mutex> everywhere Contention, complexity Message passing
thread::sleep in async Blocks executor tokio::time::sleep
Holding locks across await Blocks other tasks Scope locks tightly
Ignoring deadlock risk Hard to debug Lock ordering, try_lock

Async-Specific Patterns

Avoid MutexGuard Across Await

// Bad: guard held across await
let guard = mutex.lock().await;
do_async().await;  // guard still held!

// Good: scope the lock
{
    let guard = mutex.lock().await;
    // use guard
}  // guard dropped
do_async().await;

Non-Send Types in Async

// Rc is !Send, can't cross await in spawned task
// Option 1: use Arc instead
// Option 2: use spawn_local (single-thread runtime)
// Option 3: ensure Rc is dropped before .await

Related Skills

When See
Smart pointer choice m02-resource
Interior mutability m03-mutability
Performance tuning m10-performance
Domain concurrency needs domain-*
how to use m07-concurrency

How to use m07-concurrency on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add m07-concurrency
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m07-concurrency

The skills CLI fetches m07-concurrency from GitHub repository actionbook/rust-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/m07-concurrency

Reload or restart Cursor to activate m07-concurrency. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /m07-concurrency) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.664 reviews
  • Mei Mehta· Dec 24, 2024

    m07-concurrency is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Tariq Thompson· Dec 24, 2024

    m07-concurrency fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Kabir Sanchez· Dec 16, 2024

    Registry listing for m07-concurrency matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Li Rao· Dec 16, 2024

    m07-concurrency has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024

    m07-concurrency reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Mei Sethi· Dec 12, 2024

    We added m07-concurrency from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: m07-concurrency is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aanya Torres· Dec 8, 2024

    m07-concurrency fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Yusuf Malhotra· Nov 27, 2024

    m07-concurrency is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Sophia Ramirez· Nov 15, 2024

    m07-concurrency fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 64

1 / 7