type-design-performance▌
aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Use this skill when:
Type Design for Performance
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Designing new types and APIs
- Reviewing code for performance issues
- Choosing between class, struct, and record
- Working with collections and enumerables
Core Principles
- Seal your types - Unless explicitly designed for inheritance
- Prefer readonly structs - For small, immutable value types
- Prefer static pure functions - Better performance and testability
- Defer enumeration - Don't materialize until you need to
- Return immutable collections - From API boundaries
Seal Classes by Default
Sealing classes enables JIT devirtualization and communicates API intent.
// DO: Seal classes not designed for inheritance
public sealed class OrderProcessor
{
public void Process(Order order) { }
}
// DO: Seal records (they're classes)
public sealed record OrderCreated(OrderId Id, CustomerId CustomerId);
// DON'T: Leave unsealed without reason
public class OrderProcessor // Can be subclassed - intentional?
{
public virtual void Process(Order order) { } // Virtual = slower
}
Benefits:
- JIT can devirtualize method calls
- Communicates "this is not an extension point"
- Prevents accidental breaking changes
Readonly Structs for Value Types
Structs should be readonly when immutable. This prevents defensive copies.
// DO: Readonly struct for immutable value types
public readonly record struct OrderId(Guid Value)
{
public static OrderId New() => new(Guid.NewGuid());
public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}
// DO: Readonly struct for small, short-lived data
public readonly struct Money
{
public decimal Amount { get; }
public string Currency { get; }
public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
{
Amount = amount;
Currency = currency;
}
}
// DON'T: Mutable struct (causes defensive copies)
public struct Point // Not readonly!
{
public int X { get; set; } // Mutable!
public int Y { get; set; }
}
When to Use Structs
| Use Struct When | Use Class When |
|---|---|
| Small (≤16 bytes typically) | Larger objects |
| Short-lived | Long-lived |
| Frequently allocated | Shared references needed |
| Value semantics required | Identity semantics required |
| Immutable | Mutable state |
Prefer Static Pure Functions
Static methods with no side effects are faster and more testable.
// DO: Static pure function
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
var total = items.Sum(i => i.Price * i.Quantity);
return new Money(total, "USD");
}
}
// Usage - predictable, testable
var total = OrderCalculator.CalculateTotal(items);
Benefits:
- No vtable lookup (faster)
- No hidden state
- Easier to test (pure input → output)
- Thread-safe by design
- Forces explicit dependencies
// DON'T: Instance method hiding dependencies
public class OrderCalculator
{
private readonly ITaxService _taxService; // Hidden dependency
private readonly IDiscountService _discountService; // Hidden dependency
public Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
// What does this actually depend on?
}
}
// BETTER: Explicit dependencies via parameters
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(
IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items,
decimal taxRate,
decimal discountPercent)
{
// All inputs visible
}
}
Don't go overboard - Use instance methods when you genuinely need state or polymorphism.
Defer Enumeration
Don't materialize enumerables until necessary. Avoid excessive LINQ chains.
// BAD: Premature materialization
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.ToList() // Materialized!
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt) // Another iteration
.ToList(); // Materialized again!
}
// GOOD: Defer until the end
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt)
.ToList(); // Single materialization
}
// GOOD: Return IEnumerable if caller might not need all items
public IEnumerable<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt);
// Caller decides when to materialize
}
Async Enumeration
Be careful with async and IEnumerable:
// BAD: Async in LINQ - hidden allocations
var results = orders
.Select(async o => await ProcessOrderAsync(o)) // Task per item!
.ToList();
await Task.WhenAll(results);
// GOOD: Use IAsyncEnumerable for streaming
public async IAsyncEnumerable<OrderResult> ProcessOrdersAsync(
IEnumerable<Order> orders,
[EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken ct = default)
{
how to use type-design-performanceHow to use type-design-performance on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add type-design-performance
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill type-design-performanceThe skills CLI fetches type-design-performance from GitHub repository aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/type-design-performanceReload or restart Cursor to activate type-design-performance. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /type-design-performance) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
✓Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
✓Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
✓Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.6★★★★★46 reviews- ★★★★★Kabir Choi· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for type-design-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ishan Lopez· Dec 16, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Aanya Martin· Dec 12, 2024
type-design-performance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Ndlovu· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: type-design-performance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Fatima Iyer· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in type-design-performance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Farah· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend type-design-performance for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Advait Kapoor· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in type-design-performance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Sakura Ramirez· Oct 14, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ishan Flores· Oct 2, 2024
I recommend type-design-performance for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yuki Li· Sep 13, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 46
1 / 5