Comprehensive technical SEO audits covering crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals, and site health.
Works with
Analyzes eight core areas: robots.txt and sitemaps, index status and blockers, Core Web Vitals (LCP/CLS/INP/TTFB), mobile-friendliness, HTTPS/security headers, URL structure and redirects, structured data validation, and hreflang implementation
Produces a scored technical health report (0–100) with critical/high/medium issue triage, affected page counts, and specific data points for
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontechnical-seo-checkerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches technical-seo-checker from aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate technical-seo-checker. Access via /technical-seo-checker in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
873
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
873
stars
SEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · ClawHub · skills.sh System Mode: This optimization skill follows the shared Skill Contract and State Model.
This skill performs comprehensive technical SEO audits to identify issues that may prevent search engines from properly crawling, indexing, and ranking your site.
System role: Optimization layer skill. It turns weak pages, structures, and technical issues into prioritized repair work.
Use this when the conversation involves any of these situations — even if the user does not use SEO terminology:
Use this whenever the task needs a diagnosis or repair plan that should feed directly into remediation work, not just a one-time opinion.
Start with one of these prompts. Finish with a short handoff summary using the repository format in Skill Contract.
Perform a technical SEO audit for [URL/domain]
Check Core Web Vitals for [URL]
Audit crawlability and indexability for [domain]
Technical SEO checklist for migrating [old domain] to [new domain]
Expected output: a scored diagnosis, prioritized repair plan, and a short handoff summary ready for memory/audits/.
memory/audits/.memory/open-loops.md and memory/decisions.md.Next Best Skill below when the repair path is clear.See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.
With ~~web crawler + ~~page speed tool + ~~CDN connected: Claude can automatically crawl the entire site structure via ~~web crawler, pull Core Web Vitals and performance metrics from ~~page speed tool, analyze caching headers from ~~CDN, and fetch mobile-friendliness data. This enables comprehensive automated technical audits.
With manual data only: Ask the user to provide:
Proceed with the full audit using provided data. Note in the output which findings are from automated crawl vs. manual review.
When a user requests a technical SEO audit:
Audit Crawlability
## Crawlability Analysis
### Robots.txt Review
**URL**: [domain]/robots.txt
**Status**: [Found/Not Found/Error]
**Current Content**:
[robots.txt content]
| Check | Status | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| File exists | ✅/❌ | [notes] |
| Valid syntax | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [errors found] |
| Sitemap declared | ✅/❌ | [sitemap URL] |
| Important pages blocked | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [blocked paths] |
| Assets blocked | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [CSS/JS blocked?] |
| Correct user-agents | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
**Issues Found**:
- [Issue 1]
- [Issue 2]
**Recommended robots.txt**:
User-agent: * Allow: / Disallow: /admin/ Disallow: /private/
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml
---
### XML Sitemap Review
**Sitemap URL**: [URL]
**Status**: [Found/Not Found/Error]
| Check | Status | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| Sitemap exists | ✅/❌ | [notes] |
| Valid XML format | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [errors] |
| In robots.txt | ✅/❌ | [notes] |
| Submitted to ~~search console | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
| URLs count | [X] | [appropriate?] |
| Only indexable URLs | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
| Includes priority | ✅/⚠️ | [notes] |
| Includes lastmod | ✅/⚠️ | [accurate?] |
**Issues Found**:
- [Issue 1]
---
### Crawl Budget Analysis
| Factor | Status | Impact |
|--------|--------|--------|
| Crawl errors | [X] errors | [Low/Med/High] |
| Duplicate content | [X] pages | [Low/Med/High] |
| Thin content | [X] pages | [Low/Med/High] |
| Redirect chains | [X] found | [Low/Med/High] |
| Orphan pages | [X] found | [Low/Med/High] |
**Crawlability Score**: [X]/10
Audit Indexability
## Indexability Analysis
### Index Status Overview
| Metric | Count | Notes |
|--------|-------|-------|
| Pages in sitemap | [X] | |
| Pages indexed | [X] | [source: site: search] |
| Index coverage ratio | [X]% | [good if >90%] |
### Index Blockers Check
| Blocker Type | Found | Pages Affected |
|--------------|-------|----------------|
| noindex meta tag | [X] | [list or "none"] |
| noindex X-Robots | [X] | [list or "none"] |
| Robots.txt blocked | [X] | [list or "none"] |
| Canonical to other | [X] | [list or "none"] |
| 4xx/5xx errors | [X] | [list or "none"] |
| Redirect loops | [X] | [list or "none"] |
### Canonical Tags Audit
| Check | Status | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| Canonicals present | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [X]% of pages |
| Self-referencing | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
| Consistent (HTTP/HTTPS) | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
| Consistent (www/non-www) | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
| No conflicting signals | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] |
### Duplicate Content Issues
| Issue Type | Count | Examples |
|------------|-------|----------|
| Exact duplicates | [X] | [URLs] |
| Near duplicates | [X] | [URLs] |
| Parameter duplicates | [X] | [URLs] |
| WWW/non-WWW | [X] | [notes] |
| HTTP/HTTPS | [X] | [notes] |
**Indexability Score**: [X]/10
Audit Site Speed & Core Web Vitals — CWV metrics (LCP/FID/CLS/INP), additional performance metrics (TTFB/FCP/Speed Index/TBT), resource loading breakdown, optimization recommendations
Reference: See references/technical-audit-templates.md for the performance analysis template (Step 3).
Audit Mobile-Friendliness — Mobile-friendly test, responsive design check, mobile-first indexing verification
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills
kostja94/marketing-skills
kostja94/marketing-skills
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
mindrally/skills
resciencelab/opc-skills
Registry listing for technical-seo-checker matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
technical-seo-checker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: technical-seo-checker is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for technical-seo-checker matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
technical-seo-checker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
technical-seo-checker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
technical-seo-checker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend technical-seo-checker for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in technical-seo-checker — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend technical-seo-checker for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 67