Audit and strengthen entity recognition across search engines and AI systems.
Works with
Evaluates entity presence across Google Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, Wikipedia, and AI systems with a 47-signal checklist covering structured data, knowledge bases, consistency, content authority, third-party mentions, and AI-specific signals
Identifies gaps in entity identity and creates prioritized action plans with specific, timeframed steps for establishing or fixing brand, person, product, or organization e
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionentity-optimizerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches entity-optimizer from aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate entity-optimizer. Access via /entity-optimizer in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
873
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
873
stars
SEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · ClawHub · skills.sh System Mode: This cross-cutting skill is part of the protocol layer and follows the shared Skill Contract and State Model.
Audits, builds, and maintains entity identity across search engines and AI systems. Entities — the people, organizations, products, and concepts that search engines and AI systems recognize as distinct things — are the foundation of how both Google and LLMs decide what a brand is and whether to cite it.
Why entities matter for SEO + GEO:
System role: Canonical Entity Profile. It acts as the source of truth for entity identity, associations, and disambiguation across the library.
Use this when brand or entity identity needs to be established or verified — even if the user doesn't use entity terminology:
memory/entities/candidates.md accumulates 3 or more uncanonized entity candidates from other skillsStart with one of these prompts. Finish with a canonical entity profile and a handoff summary using the repository format in Skill Contract.
Audit entity presence for [brand/person/organization]
How well do search engines and AI systems recognize [entity name]?
Build entity presence for [new brand] in the [industry] space
Establish [person name] as a recognized expert in [topic]
My Knowledge Panel shows incorrect information — fix entity signals for [entity]
AI systems confuse [my entity] with [other entity] — help me disambiguate
Expected output: an entity audit, a canonical entity profile, and a short handoff summary ready for memory/entities/.
memory/entities/.CLAUDE.md, memory/entities/, and memory/open-loops.md.This skill is the sole writer of canonical entity profiles at memory/entities/<name>.md. Other skills write entity candidates to memory/entities/candidates.md only. When 3+ candidates accumulate, this skill should be recommended.
Next Best Skill below once the entity truth is clear.See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.
With ~~knowledge graph + ~~SEO tool + ~~AI monitor + ~~brand monitor connected: Query Knowledge Graph API for entity status, pull branded search data from ~~SEO tool, test AI citation with ~~AI monitor, track brand mentions with ~~brand monitor.
With manual data only: Ask the user to provide:
Without tools, Claude provides entity optimization strategy and recommendations based on information the user provides. The user must run search queries, check Knowledge Panels, and test AI responses to supply the raw data for analysis.
Proceed with the audit using public search results, AI query testing, and SERP analysis. Note which items require tool access for full evaluation.
When a user requests entity optimization:
Establish the entity's current state across all systems.
### Entity Profile
**Entity Name**: [name]
**Entity Type**: [Person / Organization / Brand / Product / Creative Work / Event]
**Primary Domain**: [URL]
**Target Topics**: [topic 1, topic 2, topic 3]
#### Current Entity Presence
| Platform | Status | Details |
|----------|--------|---------|
| Google Knowledge Panel | ✅ Present / ❌ Absent / ⚠️ Incorrect | [details] |
| Wikidata | ✅ Listed / ❌ Not listed | [QID if exists] |
| Wikipedia | ✅ Article / ⚠️ Mentioned only / ❌ Absent | [notability assessment] |
| Google Knowledge Graph API | ✅ Entity found / ❌ Not found | [entity ID, types, score] |
| Schema.org on site | ✅ Complete / ⚠️ Partial / ❌ Missing | [Organization/Person/Product schema] |
#### AI Entity Resolution Test
**Note**: Claude cannot directly query other AI systems or perform real-time web searches without tool access. When running without ~~AI monitor or ~~knowledge graph tools, ask the user to run these test queries and report the results, or use the user-provided information to assess entity presence.
Test how AI systems identify this entity by querying:
- "What is [entity name]?"
- "Who founded [entity name]?" (for organizations)
- "What does [entity name] do?"
- "[entity name] vs [competitor]"
| AI System | Recognizes Entity? | Description Accuracy | Cites Entity's Content? |
|-----------|-------------------|---------------------|------------------------|
| ChatGPT | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Claude | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Perplexity | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Google AI Overview | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
Evaluate entity signals across 6 categories. For the detailed 47-signal checklist with verification methods, see references/entity-signal-checklist.md.
Evaluate each signal as Pass / Fail / Partial with a specific action for each gap. The 6 categories are:
Reference: Use the audit template in references/entity-signal-checklist.md for the full 47-signal checklist with verification methods for each category.
## Entity Optimization Report
### Overview
- **Entity**: [name]
- **Entity Type**: [type]
- **Audit Date**: [date]
### Signal Category Summary
| Category | Status | Key Findings |
|----------|--------|-------------|
| Structured Data | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
| Knowledge Base | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
| Consistency (NAP+E) | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
| Content-Based | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
| Third-Party | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
| AI-Specific | ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Gaps / ❌ Missing | [key findings] |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: entity-optimizer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: entity-optimizer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added entity-optimizer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added entity-optimizer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
entity-optimizer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
entity-optimizer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: entity-optimizer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend entity-optimizer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend entity-optimizer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
entity-optimizer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 28