explainx.ainewsletter3.5k
TrendingNewsPathwaysSkills
Pricing
explainx.ai

Upskill in AI — 16 free pathways, live workshops & bootcamps, and 50+ courses from practitioners. Plus the skills, tools, and MCP servers to practice on.

follow us

corporate training

support@explainx.ai

get started

Find your pathTake Free Evaluation

learn

pathways — start freeworkshopsbootcampscoursescertificationsmock testsexplainx universitycorporate traininglearn skills & mcp

discover

skillsmcp serversexplainx mcptoolsagentsllmsdesignsdictionaryagi trackerranks

company

aboutvisionmissionteaminstructorscommunityhackathonscareers

content

daily AI newsstate of AI — live resultsblogreleasespromptsgeneratorsresource libraryfor LLMsexplainx.ai kids

solutions

all solutionsdeveloper upskillingmarketing upskillingproduct manager upskillingleadership upskilling

newsletter · weekly

Get AI news, tools, and insights in your inbox.

supportcontactprivacytermsdata rightshow we create contentsubmission guidelines

© 2026 AISOLO Technologies Pvt Ltd

On this page

  • TL;DR — what people are asking
  • How the attack chain works
  • What this means for what you build or pay
  • Mitigation checklist (do today)
  • NemoClaw vs generic Ollama risk
  • Honest limitations
  • Related on explainx.ai
← Back to blog

explainx / blog

NVIDIA NemoClaw CVE-2026-65105: One Webpage Can Poison Local Ollama

Cyera/Oasis disclosed CVE-2026-65105 Aug 25, 2026 — NemoClaw binds Ollama to 0.0.0.0, enabling DNS rebinding drive-by hijacks that persistently poison chat templates. Fix in NemoClaw v0.0.35 (macOS/Linux); Windows still exposed.

Aug 26, 2026·4 min read·Yash Thakker
NVIDIA NemoClawOpenClawCybersecurityLocal AIOllama
go deep
NVIDIA NemoClaw CVE-2026-65105: One Webpage Can Poison Local Ollama

August 25, 2026 — Cyera's Oasis Security research disclosed CVE-2026-65105 in NVIDIA NemoClaw: a local AI deployment choice that turns your Ollama backend into a drive-by hijack surface. One visit to a malicious webpage can enumerate models, rewrite chat templates, and leave persistent hidden instructions that survive the agent's own system prompt — no traditional malware download required.

NemoClaw exists so developers can run OpenClaw-class agents on DGX Station and OpenShell sandboxes with local Nemotron weights. The vulnerability is not "LLMs are insecure." It is 0.0.0.0 binding meeting browser DNS rebinding.

TL;DR — what people are asking

table · 2 cols
QuestionAnswer
CVE?CVE-2026-65105
Disclosed?Aug 25, 2026 — Cyera / Oasis → NVIDIA PSIRT
Root cause?Ollama on 0.0.0.0:11434, no auth, Host checks weakened
Attack?DNS rebinding from malicious page → full Ollama API
Impact?Model template poisoning; LAN neighbors can also hit API
Fixed?NemoClaw v0.0.35 (macOS/Linux); Windows gap reported
Malware needed?No — browser visit while agent running
Weekly digest3.5k readers

Catch up on AI

Curated AI updates on agents, skills, and MCP — delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

How the attack chain works

Cyera's write-up walks a four-step PoC:

  1. Developer runs NemoClaw + OpenClaw — agent answers normally.
  2. Same machine opens an attacker page performing DNS rebinding to 127.0.0.1.
  3. Page calls Ollama API — lists models, pulls version, injects template text.
  4. Developer returns to agent — responses include attacker marker; injection persists across prompts.

Because NemoClaw binds Ollama for container reachability, the API is also exposed to any device on the LAN without rebinding — port 11434 becomes a shared unauthenticated endpoint.

Dark Reading and The Hacker News confirmed Firefox on macOS PoC success pre-patch; Linux matched until v0.0.35.

What this means for what you build or pay

Local-first agent stacks trade cloud API risk for host networking risk. If you ship NemoClaw blueprints to customers, you are shipping inference surface area — audit binds before praising "data never leaves the laptop."

Template poisoning is worse than prompt injection in one session: poisoned templates sit below the harness system prompt in the demonstrated chain, so your CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md guardrails may not see the compromised layer.

Compliance teams evaluating Siggraph NemoClaw demos should add network hardening to pilot requirements — not optional for production pilots.

Mitigation checklist (do today)

bash
# Verify Ollama bind — should NOT be 0.0.0.0 in production dev machines
lsof -i :11434

# Prefer loopback-only (example systemd override or launch flag)
OLLAMA_HOST=127.0.0.1:11434 ollama serve
  1. Upgrade NemoClaw to v0.0.35+ on macOS/Linux.
  2. Windows/WSL — assume exposed until NVIDIA confirms patch; do not expose 11434.
  3. Put auth in front — reverse proxy with token even on localhost multi-user machines.
  4. Firewall LAN — block inbound 11434 on office Wi-Fi for developer laptops.
  5. Re-pull models if you suspect compromise — attacker PoC included model manipulation APIs.

NemoClaw vs generic Ollama risk

table · 3 cols
SetupDefault bindCVE-2026-65105 class
NemoClaw + OpenShell0.0.0.0 (pre-patch)Yes — documented
Manual OllamaOften 127.0.0.1Only if you chose 0.0.0.0
DGX Spark local stackVaries by scriptAudit DGX Spark guide

Honest limitations

  • Windows patch status was unclear at disclosure — re-check NVIDIA release notes before declaring green.
  • No widespread exploitation reported yet — risk is configuration prevalence among early NemoClaw adopters.
  • Other backends (non-Ollama) were not in scope for this CVE — still audit any local OpenAI-compatible port.
  • Browser-dependent — rebinding PoCs vary by browser DNS cache behavior; LAN access does not.

Related on explainx.ai

  • NVIDIA Siggraph 2026 — NemoClaw and DGX Station
  • What is OpenClaw?
  • OpenClaw foundation 501(c)(3)
  • NVIDIA DGX Spark local LLM setup
  • MCP security guide
  • AGENTS.md code quality and hooks
  • Four AI agent security incidents
  • Fake Codex Google Ads AMOS campaign

CVE status and NemoClaw version numbers accurate as of August 26, 2026 — confirm against NVIDIA security advisories before compliance sign-off.

Spotted something out of date? Let us know.
Yash Thakker

Written by

Yash Thakker

Yash is an AI expert with over 300K learners. Join his workshops →

Related posts

Jul 26, 2026

Top 10 Open-Weight Models You Can Actually Run on a Laptop

A model being downloadable does not make it laptop-friendly. This ranked guide starts with memory math, then recommends ten models that remain useful after weights, context cache, and operating-system overhead are counted.

Jun 27, 2026

What it takes to go open source with AI as an individual: budget, hardware, and honest limits (2026)

Open-weight models closed the gap with cloud AI for most daily work—but going open source as an individual still means picking hardware, accepting latency, and knowing when to burst to a paid API. A realistic first-person checklist.

Aug 26, 2026

Fake Codex Installer: Google Ads ClickFix Delivers AMOS on macOS

Threat actors bought Google Ads above OpenAI's real Codex listing, hosted convincing download pages on Google Sites, and used ClickFix social engineering to make macOS developers paste a malicious install command into Terminal. explainx.ai breaks down the AMOS delivery overlap, why AI-tool search terms are high-value lures, and the Terminal telemetry defenders can monitor.