review▌

This skill provides comprehensive architecture review capabilities for Python backend applications, covering all aspects of system design from infrastructure to code organization.

Simple, pragmatic, opinionated. Only what matters for writing production-grade PostgreSQL queries.

Simple, pragmatic, opinionated. Only what matters for writing production-grade Rust code.

Perform comprehensive code reviews of GitLab merge requests, providing actionable feedback on code quality, security, performance, and best practices.

Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. \n \n Detects SOLID violations (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP), architecture smells, and proposes incremental refactors with clear rationale \n Scans for security risks including injection, XSS, AuthZ gaps, race conditions, and unsafe deserialization with exploitability assessment \n Identifies removal candidates and unused code with safe deletion vs. deferred plans and concrete follow-up checkpoints \n Flags code quality issues: e

Comprehensive security checklist covering secrets, input validation, authentication, and deployment readiness. \n \n Covers 10 critical security domains: secrets management, input validation, SQL injection prevention, authentication/authorization, XSS prevention, CSRF protection, rate limiting, sensitive data exposure, blockchain wallet verification, and dependency security \n Includes code examples for both unsafe and secure patterns across TypeScript, SQL, and configuration files \n Provides p

Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound. \n \n Integrates with subagent-driven development workflows, triggering review after each task or before merging to main \n Provides code-reviewer subagent with precise git SHAs, implementation details, and requirements, keeping reviewer focused on work product rather than session history \n Categorizes feedback into Critical (fix immediately), Important (fix before proceeding), and Minor (note for later) s

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.

Systematic Go code review against community style standards and best practices. \n \n Covers 15+ review categories: formatting, documentation, error handling, naming, concurrency, interfaces, data structures, security, declarations, functions, style, logging, imports, generics, and testing \n Includes automated pre-review checks via gofmt , go vet , and golangci-lint to catch mechanical issues before manual review \n Organizes findings by severity (must-fix, should-fix, nit) using a consistent t