problem▌

Structured problem framing workshop using MITRE's three-phase canvas to challenge assumptions before solutioning. \n \n Guides teams through Look Inward (examine biases and assumptions), Look Outward (understand who experiences the problem and who's been left out), and Reframe (synthesize into actionable problem statement and \"How Might We\" question) \n Surfaces overlooked stakeholders, marginalized voices, and who benefits from the problem existing, ensuring equity-driven framing \n Produces

A conversational framework for systematic scientific problem selection based on Fischbach & Walsh's "Problem choice and decision trees in science and engineering" (Cell, 2024).

Apply A3 problem-solving format for comprehensive, single-page problem documentation and resolution planning.

A collection of techniques for breaking through stuck points and finding elegant solutions.

User-centered problem framing that captures who is blocked, what they're trying to do, why it matters, and how it feels. \n \n Structures problems around five dimensions: persona, desired outcomes, barriers, root causes, and emotional impact—ensuring you solve problems worth solving, not feature requests \n Includes a fill-in template, quality checks, and anti-patterns to avoid solution smuggling, generic personas, and symptom-level diagnosis \n Designed for discovery alignment, stakeholder buy-

Help users articulate problems clearly before pursuing solutions, using frameworks from 91 product leaders. \n \n Guides users through understanding current framing, identifying struggling moments, separating problems from solutions, and validating problem urgency \n Covers eight core principles including avoiding the shiny object trap, prototyping to define problems, and spending more time on problem understanding than solution design \n Includes diagnostic questions to uncover user context, wo