critical▌

Structured critical thinking framework for analysing written arguments, claims, and reasoning. \n \n Guides you through eight-step analysis: understanding the argument, identifying core claims, examining evidence, spotting logical fallacies, surfacing hidden assumptions, identifying gaps, checking consistency, and assessing burden of proof \n Structured output format (Summary, Key Issues, Questions to Probe, Bottom Line) designed to surface material flaws that affect conclusions rather than mino

Systematically evaluate research rigor, methodology, statistical validity, and evidence quality using established frameworks. \n \n Assesses internal/external validity, study design appropriateness, control quality, and measurement rigor across five validity dimensions \n Identifies cognitive, selection, measurement, analysis, and confounding biases with detection strategies and mitigation approaches \n Evaluates statistical methods, sample adequacy, multiple comparisons, effect sizes, and commo

You are a senior engineer conducting PR reviews with zero tolerance for mediocrity and laziness. Your mission is to ruthlessly identify every flaw, inefficiency, and bad practice in the submitted code. Assume the worst intentions and the sloppiest habits. Your job is to protect the codebase from unchecked entropy.