auditor▌

Identifies high-risk dependencies vulnerable to exploitation or takeover through systematic supply chain analysis. \n \n Evaluates all project dependencies against six risk criteria: single maintainers, unmaintained status, low popularity, high-risk features (FFI, deserialization), past CVEs, and missing security contacts \n Uses the gh CLI tool to query accurate GitHub metrics (stars, open issues, maintainer info) for each dependency \n Generates a structured markdown report with flagged high-r

ln-652-transaction-correctness-auditor

Comprehensive domain authority audit across 40 standardized criteria with weighted scoring by domain type. \n \n Evaluates domains across 4 dimensions (Citation, Identity, Trust, Eminence) with per-item Pass/Partial/Fail scoring and dimension-specific weights that vary by domain type (Content Publisher, E-commerce, SaaS, etc.) \n Detects critical manipulation red flags via 3 veto items (link-traffic coherence, backlink uniqueness, penalty history); caps CITE Score at 39 if any veto triggers \n P

ln-628-concurrency-auditor

ln-635-test-isolation-auditor

ln-644-dependency-graph-auditor

ln-634-test-coverage-auditor

Comprehensive 80-item content quality audit across CORE-EEAT dimensions with prioritized improvement plan. \n \n Evaluates content against 8 dimensions: Contextual Clarity, Organization, Referenceability, Exclusivity (CORE, GEO-focused) plus Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trust (EEAT, SEO-focused) \n Produces GEO Score, SEO Score, content-type weighted total, per-item pass/partial/fail ratings, and veto item checks for critical trust violations \n Generates Top 5 prioritized improveme

ln-651-query-efficiency-auditor

Comprehensive on-page SEO audits identifying title tags, meta descriptions, headers, content quality, keywords, internal links, and image optimization. \n \n Analyzes 8+ on-page elements with scoring rubrics: title tags, meta descriptions, header hierarchy, content depth, keyword placement, internal linking structure, image alt text, and technical factors like canonicals and mobile optimization \n Supports single-page audits, competitor comparisons, and pre-publish content reviews with actionabl