ultraqa

yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode · updated May 23, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill ultraqa
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

[ULTRAQA ACTIVATED - AUTONOMOUS QA CYCLING]

skill.md

UltraQA Skill

[ULTRAQA ACTIVATED - AUTONOMOUS QA CYCLING]

Overview

You are now in ULTRAQA mode - an autonomous QA cycling workflow that runs until your quality goal is met.

Cycle: qa-tester → architect verification → fix → repeat

Goal Parsing

Parse the goal from arguments. Supported formats:

Invocation Goal Type What to Check
/oh-my-claudecode:ultraqa --tests tests All test suites pass
/oh-my-claudecode:ultraqa --build build Build succeeds with exit 0
/oh-my-claudecode:ultraqa --lint lint No lint errors
/oh-my-claudecode:ultraqa --typecheck typecheck No TypeScript errors
/oh-my-claudecode:ultraqa --custom "pattern" custom Custom success pattern in output

If no structured goal provided, interpret the argument as a custom goal.

Cycle Workflow

Cycle N (Max 5)

  1. RUN QA: Execute verification based on goal type

    • --tests: Run the project's test command
    • --build: Run the project's build command
    • --lint: Run the project's lint command
    • --typecheck: Run the project's type check command
    • --custom: Run appropriate command and check for pattern
    • --interactive: Use qa-tester for interactive CLI/service testing:
      Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:qa-tester", model="sonnet", prompt="TEST:
      Goal: [describe what to verify]
      Service: [how to start]
      Test cases: [specific scenarios to verify]")
      
  2. CHECK RESULT: Did the goal pass?

    • YES → Exit with success message
    • NO → Continue to step 3
  3. ARCHITECT DIAGNOSIS: Spawn architect to analyze failure

    Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:architect", model="opus", prompt="DIAGNOSE FAILURE:
    Goal: [goal type]
    Output: [test/build output]
    Provide root cause and specific fix recommendations.")
    
  4. FIX ISSUES: Apply architect's recommendations

    Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:executor", model="sonnet", prompt="FIX:
    Issue: [architect diagnosis]
    Files: [affected files]
    Apply the fix precisely as recommended.")
    
  5. REPEAT: Go back to step 1

Exit Conditions

Condition Action
Goal Met Exit with success: "ULTRAQA COMPLETE: Goal met after N cycles"
Cycle 5 Reached Exit with diagnosis: "ULTRAQA STOPPED: Max cycles. Diagnosis: ..."
Same Failure 3x Exit early: "ULTRAQA STOPPED: Same failure detected 3 times. Root cause: ..."
Environment Error Exit: "ULTRAQA ERROR: [tmux/port/dependency issue]"

Observability

Output progress each cycle:

[ULTRAQA Cycle 1/5] Running tests...
[ULTRAQA Cycle 1/5] FAILED - 3 tests failing
[ULTRAQA Cycle 1/5] Architect diagnosing...
[ULTRAQA Cycle 1/5] Fixing: auth.test.ts - missing mock
[ULTRAQA Cycle 2/5] Running tests...
[ULTRAQA Cycle 2/5] PASSED - All 47 tests pass
[ULTRAQA COMPLETE] Goal met after 2 cycles

State Tracking

Track state in .omc/ultraqa-state.json:

{
  "active": true,
  "goal_type": "tests",
  "goal_pattern": null,
  "cycle": 1,
  "max_cycles": 5,
  "failures": ["3 tests failing: auth.test.ts"],
  "started_at": "2024-01-18T12:00:00Z",
  "session_id": "uuid"
}

Cancellation

User can cancel with /oh-my-claudecode:cancel which clears the state file.

Important Rules

  1. PARALLEL when possible - Run diagnosis while preparing potential fixes
  2. TRACK failures - Record each failure to detect patterns
  3. EARLY EXIT on pattern - 3x same failure = stop and surface
  4. CLEAR OUTPUT - User should always know current cycle and status
  5. CLEAN UP - Clear state file on completion or cancellation

STATE CLEANUP ON COMPLETION

IMPORTANT: Delete state files on completion - do NOT just set active: false

When goal is met OR max cycles reached OR exiting early:

# Delete ultraqa state file
rm -f .omc/state/ultraqa-state.json

This ensures clean state for future sessions. Stale state files with active: false should not be left behind.


Begin ULTRAQA cycling now. Parse the goal and start cycle 1.

how to use ultraqa

How to use ultraqa on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ultraqa
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill ultraqa

The skills CLI fetches ultraqa from GitHub repository yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/ultraqa

Reload or restart Cursor to activate ultraqa. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ultraqa) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.668 reviews
  • William Farah· Dec 16, 2024

    ultraqa is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ava Rao· Dec 12, 2024

    Useful defaults in ultraqa — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Evelyn Agarwal· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend ultraqa for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for ultraqa matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Sakura Srinivasan· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ultraqa is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Camila Chen· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in ultraqa — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Daniel Farah· Nov 23, 2024

    ultraqa has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ava Perez· Nov 7, 2024

    ultraqa reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • William Abbas· Nov 3, 2024

    I recommend ultraqa for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ava Choi· Oct 26, 2024

    I recommend ultraqa for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 68

1 / 7