Use this skill for ambiguous, causal, evidence-heavy questions where the goal is to explain why an observed result happened, not to jump directly into fixing or rewriting code.
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example: Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example: Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example: Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example: Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill traceCompatible with
Supported agents
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontraceExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill traceFetches trace from yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/trace
Restart Cursor to activate trace. Access via /tracein your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Time estimate: 30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Prerequisites
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
roblox-game-development
greedychipmunk/agent-skills · Productivity · same category
nestjs-best-practices
kadajett/agent-nestjs-skills · Productivity · same category
pagespeed-insights
enderpuentes/ai-agent-skills · Productivity · same category
xauusd-trading
huynguyen03dev/xauusd-trading · Productivity · same category
reverse-engineering-tools
gmh5225/awesome-game-security · Productivity · same category
brand-name-generator
shipshitdev/library · Productivity · same category
trace reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for trace matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
We added trace from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: trace is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
trace fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend trace for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
trace has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend trace for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
trace fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: trace is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 28