Organize and manage Conductor tracks—logical work units for features, bugs, and refactors.
Works with
Provides track lifecycle management from creation through completion, including specification (spec.md), planning (plan.md), and status tracking via tracks.md registry
Supports four track types: feature, bug, chore, and refactor, each with distinct use cases and conventions
Includes structured templates for specifications with functional/non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, scope b
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontrack-managementExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches track-management from wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate track-management. Access via /track-management in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
33.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
33.1K
stars
Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases.
A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has:
Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling:
New functionality or capabilities. Use for:
Defect fixes. Use for:
Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for:
Code improvement without behavior change. Use for:
Track IDs follow the pattern: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
user-auth, api-rate-limit)Examples:
user-auth_20250115fix-login-error_20250115upgrade-deps_20250115refactor-api-client_20250115Define Requirements
Generate Specification
spec.md with structured requirementsGenerate Plan
plan.md with phased task breakdownRegister Track
tracks.md registrymetadata.jsonindex.mdExecute Tasks
Update Status
Verify Progress
Sync Documentation
Archive or Delete
# {Track Title}
## Overview
Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why.
## Functional Requirements
### FR-1: {Requirement Name}
Description of the functional requirement.
- Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met
### FR-2: {Requirement Name}
...
## Non-Functional Requirements
### NFR-1: {Requirement Name}
Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.)
- Target: Specific measurable target
- Verification: How to test
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition
- [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition
- [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition
## Scope
### In Scope
- Explicitly included items
- Features to implement
- Components to modify
### Out of Scope
- Explicitly excluded items
- Future considerations
- Related but separate work
## Dependencies
### Internal
- Other tracks or components this depends on
- Required context artifacts
### External
- Third-party services or APIs
- External dependencies
## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
| ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- |
| Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy |
## Open Questions
- [ ] Question that needs resolution
- [x] Resolved question - Answer
# Implementation Plan: {Track Title}
Track ID: `{track-id}`
Created: YYYY-MM-DD
Status: pending | in-progress | completed
## Overview
Brief description of implementation approach.
## Phase 1: {Phase Name}
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description
- Sub-task or detail
- Sub-task or detail
- [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description
- [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase
## Phase 2: {Phase Name}
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description
- [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase
## Phase 3: Finalization
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation
- [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met
## Checkpoints
| Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status |
| ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- |
| Phase 1 | | | pending |
| Phase 2 | | | pending |
| Phase 3 | | | pending |
Use consistent markers in plan.md:
| Marker | Meaning | Usage |
|---|---|---|
[ ] |
Pending | Task not started |
[~] |
In Progress | Currently being worked |
[x] |
Complete | Task finished (include SHA) |
[-] |
Skipped | Intentionally not done |
[!] |
Blocked | Waiting on dependency |
Example:
- [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234`
- [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model
- [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic
- [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key)
- [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed)
# Track Registry
## Active Tracks
| Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- |
| [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_202Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
We added track-management from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in track-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
track-management fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
track-management is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
track-management reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend track-management for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: track-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for track-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
track-management reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Useful defaults in track-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 51