stride-analysis-patterns

wshobson/agents · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill stride-analysis-patterns
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Systematic threat identification using the STRIDE methodology for security analysis and documentation.

  • Covers six threat categories (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) with specific questions and control families for each
  • Includes ready-to-use templates for threat model documents, data flow diagram analysis, and risk assessment matrices with prioritization
  • Provides Python utilities for automated threat enumeration, que
skill.md

STRIDE Analysis Patterns

Systematic threat identification using the STRIDE methodology.

When to Use This Skill

  • Starting new threat modeling sessions
  • Analyzing existing system architecture
  • Reviewing security design decisions
  • Creating threat documentation
  • Training teams on threat identification
  • Compliance and audit preparation

Core Concepts

1. STRIDE Categories

S - Spoofing       → Authentication threats
T - Tampering      → Integrity threats
R - Repudiation    → Non-repudiation threats
I - Information    → Confidentiality threats
    Disclosure
D - Denial of      → Availability threats
    Service
E - Elevation of   → Authorization threats
    Privilege

2. Threat Analysis Matrix

Category Question Control Family
Spoofing Can attacker pretend to be someone else? Authentication
Tampering Can attacker modify data in transit/rest? Integrity
Repudiation Can attacker deny actions? Logging/Audit
Info Disclosure Can attacker access unauthorized data? Encryption
DoS Can attacker disrupt availability? Rate limiting
Elevation Can attacker gain higher privileges? Authorization

Templates

Template 1: STRIDE Threat Model Document

# Threat Model: [System Name]

## 1. System Overview

### 1.1 Description

[Brief description of the system and its purpose]

### 1.2 Data Flow Diagram

[User] --> [Web App] --> [API Gateway] --> [Backend Services] | v [Database]


### 1.3 Trust Boundaries
- **External Boundary**: Internet to DMZ
- **Internal Boundary**: DMZ to Internal Network
- **Data Boundary**: Application to Database

## 2. Assets

| Asset | Sensitivity | Description |
|-------|-------------|-------------|
| User Credentials | High | Authentication tokens, passwords |
| Personal Data | High | PII, financial information |
| Session Data | Medium | Active user sessions |
| Application Logs | Medium | System activity records |
| Configuration | High | System settings, secrets |

## 3. STRIDE Analysis

### 3.1 Spoofing Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| S1 | Session hijacking | User sessions | High | Medium |
| S2 | Token forgery | JWT tokens | High | Low |
| S3 | Credential stuffing | Login endpoint | High | High |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Implement MFA
- [ ] Use secure session management
- [ ] Implement account lockout policies

### 3.2 Tampering Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| T1 | SQL injection | Database queries | Critical | Medium |
| T2 | Parameter manipulation | API requests | High | High |
| T3 | File upload abuse | File storage | High | Medium |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Input validation on all endpoints
- [ ] Parameterized queries
- [ ] File type validation

### 3.3 Repudiation Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| R1 | Transaction denial | Financial ops | High | Medium |
| R2 | Access log tampering | Audit logs | Medium | Low |
| R3 | Action attribution | User actions | Medium | Medium |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Comprehensive audit logging
- [ ] Log integrity protection
- [ ] Digital signatures for critical actions

### 3.4 Information Disclosure Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| I1 | Data breach | User PII | Critical | Medium |
| I2 | Error message leakage | System info | Low | High |
| I3 | Insecure transmission | Network traffic | High | Medium |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Encryption at rest and in transit
- [ ] Sanitize error messages
- [ ] Implement TLS 1.3

### 3.5 Denial of Service Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| D1 | Resource exhaustion | API servers | High | High |
| D2 | Database overload | Database | Critical | Medium |
| D3 | Bandwidth saturation | Network | High | Medium |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Rate limiting
- [ ] Auto-scaling
- [ ] DDoS protection

### 3.6 Elevation of Privilege Threats

| ID | Threat | Target | Impact | Likelihood |
|----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| E1 | IDOR vulnerabilities | User resources | High | High |
| E2 | Role manipulation | Admin access | Critical | Low |
| E3 | JWT claim tampering | Authorization | High | Medium |

**Mitigations:**
- [ ] Proper authorization checks
- [ ] Principle of least privilege
- [ ] Server-side role validation

## 4. Risk Assessment

### 4.1 Risk Matrix

          IMPACT
     Low  Med  High Crit
Low   1    2    3    4

L Med 2 4 6 8 I High 3 6 9 12 K Crit 4 8 12 16


### 4.2 Prioritized Risks

| Rank | Threat | Risk Score | Priority |
|------|--------|------------|----------|
| 1 | SQL Injection (T1) | 12 | Critical |
| 2 | IDOR (E1) | 9 | High |
| 3 | Credential Stuffing (S3) | 9 | High |
| 4 | Data Breach (I1) | 8 | High |

## 5. Recommendations

### Immediate Actions
1. Implement input validation framework
2. Add rate limiting to authentication endpoints
3. Enable comprehensive audit logging

### Short-term (30 days)
1. Deploy WAF with OWASP ruleset
2. Implement MFA for sensitive operations
3. Encrypt all PII at rest

### Long-term (90 days)
1. Security awareness training
2. Penetration testing
3. Bug bounty program

Template 2: STRIDE Analysis Code

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
import json

class StrideCategory(Enum):
    SPOOFING = "S"
    TAMPERING = "T"
    REPUDIATION = "R"
    INFORMATION_DISCLOSURE = "I"
    DENIAL_OF_SERVICE = "D"
    ELEVATION_OF_PRIVILEGE = "E"


class Impact(Enum):
    LOW = 1
    MEDIUM = 2
    HIGH = 3
    CRITICAL = 4


class Likelihood(Enum):
    LOW = 1
    MEDIUM = 2
    HIGH = 3
    CRITICAL = 4


@dataclass
class Threat:
    id: str
    category: StrideCategory
    title: str
    description: str
    target: str
    impact: Impact
    likelihood: Likelihood
    mitigations: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
    status: str = "open"

    @property
    def risk_score(self) -> int:
        return self.impact.value * self.likelihood.value

    @property
    def risk_level(self) -> str:
        score = self.risk_score
        if score >= 12:
            return "Critical"
        elif score >= 6:
            return "High"
        elif score >= 3:
            return "Medium"
        return "Low"


@dataclass
class Asset:
    name: str
    sensitivity: str
    description: str
    data_classification: str


@dataclass
class TrustBoundary:
    name: str
    description: str
    from_zone: str
    to_zone: str


@dataclass
class ThreatModel:
    name: str
    version: str
    description: str
    assets: List[Asset] = field(default_factory=list)
    boundaries: List[TrustBoundary] = field(default_factory=list)
    threats: List[Threat] = field(default_factory=list)

    def add_threat(self, threat: Threat) -> None:
        self.threats.append(threat)

    def get_threats_by_category(self, category: StrideCategory) -> List[Threat]:
        return [t for t in self.threats if t.category == category]

    
how to use stride-analysis-patterns

How to use stride-analysis-patterns on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add stride-analysis-patterns
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill stride-analysis-patterns

The skills CLI fetches stride-analysis-patterns from GitHub repository wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/stride-analysis-patterns

Reload or restart Cursor to activate stride-analysis-patterns. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /stride-analysis-patterns) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.531 reviews
  • Li Sanchez· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in stride-analysis-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Sofia Park· Nov 27, 2024

    stride-analysis-patterns is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Harper Reddy· Nov 11, 2024

    stride-analysis-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Carlos Sanchez· Oct 18, 2024

    Keeps context tight: stride-analysis-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Noah Tandon· Oct 2, 2024

    Registry listing for stride-analysis-patterns matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 13, 2024

    I recommend stride-analysis-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Chen Sharma· Sep 13, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: stride-analysis-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Noah Sanchez· Sep 9, 2024

    stride-analysis-patterns has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sofia Agarwal· Aug 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: stride-analysis-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Aug 4, 2024

    Useful defaults in stride-analysis-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 31

1 / 4