Systematic visualization and analysis of attack paths with difficulty, cost, and detection metrics.
Works with
Provides Python data models for building attack trees with OR/AND logic, leaf attacks, and attributes (difficulty, cost, detection risk, time required)
Includes fluent builder API for constructing trees programmatically and methods to find easiest, cheapest, and stealthiest attack paths
Exports to Mermaid and PlantUML diagram formats for stakeholder communication and threat visualizati
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionattack-tree-constructionExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches attack-tree-construction from wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate attack-tree-construction. Access via /attack-tree-construction in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
33.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
33.1K
stars
Systematic attack path visualization and analysis.
[Root Goal]
|
┌────────────┴────────────┐
│ │
[Sub-goal 1] [Sub-goal 2]
(OR node) (AND node)
│ │
┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐
│ │ │ │
[Attack] [Attack] [Attack] [Attack]
(leaf) (leaf) (leaf) (leaf)
| Type | Symbol | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OR | Oval | Any child achieves goal |
| AND | Rectangle | All children required |
| Leaf | Box | Atomic attack step |
| Attribute | Description | Values |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Resources needed | $, $$, $$$ |
| Time | Duration to execute | Hours, Days, Weeks |
| Skill | Expertise required | Low, Medium, High |
| Detection | Likelihood of detection | Low, Medium, High |
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Union
import json
class NodeType(Enum):
OR = "or"
AND = "and"
LEAF = "leaf"
class Difficulty(Enum):
TRIVIAL = 1
LOW = 2
MEDIUM = 3
HIGH = 4
EXPERT = 5
class Cost(Enum):
FREE = 0
LOW = 1
MEDIUM = 2
HIGH = 3
VERY_HIGH = 4
class DetectionRisk(Enum):
NONE = 0
LOW = 1
MEDIUM = 2
HIGH = 3
CERTAIN = 4
@dataclass
class AttackAttributes:
difficulty: Difficulty = Difficulty.MEDIUM
cost: Cost = Cost.MEDIUM
detection_risk: DetectionRisk = DetectionRisk.MEDIUM
time_hours: float = 8.0
requires_insider: bool = False
requires_physical: bool = False
@dataclass
class AttackNode:
id: str
name: str
description: str
node_type: NodeType
attributes: AttackAttributes = field(default_factory=AttackAttributes)
children: List['AttackNode'] = field(default_factory=list)
mitigations: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
cve_refs: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
def add_child(self, child: 'AttackNode') -> None:
self.children.append(child)
def calculate_path_difficulty(self) -> float:
"""Calculate aggregate difficulty for this path."""
if self.node_type == NodeType.LEAF:
return self.attributes.difficulty.value
if not self.children:
return 0
child_difficulties = [c.calculate_path_difficulty() for c in self.children]
if self.node_type == NodeType.OR:
return min(child_difficulties)
else: # AND
return max(child_difficulties)
def calculate_path_cost(self) -> float:
"""Calculate aggregate cost for this path."""
if self.node_type == NodeType.LEAF:
return self.attributes.cost.value
if not self.children:
return 0
child_costs = [c.calculate_path_cost() for c in self.children]
if self.node_type == NodeType.OR:
return min(child_costs)
else: # AND
return sum(child_costs)
def to_dict(self) -> Dict:
"""Convert to dictionary for serialization."""
return {
"id": self.id,
"name": self.name,
"description": self.description,
"type": self.node_type.value,
"attributes": {
"difficulty": self.attributes.difficulty.name,
"cost": self.attributes.cost.name,
"detection_risk": self.attributes.detection_risk.name,
"time_hours": self.attributes.time_hours,
},
"mitigations": self.mitigations,
"children": [c.to_dict() for c in self.children]
}
@dataclass
class AttackTree:
name: str
description: str
root: AttackNode
version: str = "1.0"
def find_easiest_path(self) -> List[AttackNode]:
"""Find the path with lowest difficulty."""
return self._find_path(self.root, minimize="difficulty")
def find_cheapest_path(self) -> List[AttackNode]:
"""Find the path with lowest cost."""
return self._find_path(self.root, minimize="cost")
def find_stealthiest_path(self) -> List[AttackNode]:
"""Find the path with lowest detection risk."""
return self._find_path✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
648mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorywrite-a-prd
128mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.7★★★★★58 reviews- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for attack-tree-construction matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- IIsabella Yang★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
I recommend attack-tree-construction for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AAlexander Tandon★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: attack-tree-construction is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLucas Kim★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in attack-tree-construction — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AAlexander Srinivasan★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
attack-tree-construction has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- LLucas Zhang★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for attack-tree-construction matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: attack-tree-construction is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLi Patel★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
We added attack-tree-construction from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- AAmelia Desai★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
attack-tree-construction fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- MMei Khanna★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
Keeps context tight: attack-tree-construction is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 58
1 / 6Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.